Skip to comments.
Abortion Ship Heads for Controversial Polish Visit
Reuters ^
| Fri June 20, 2003
| Paul Gallagh
Posted on 06/20/2003 2:41:27 PM PDT by nickcarraway
AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - A Dutch floating abortion clinic was due to dock in Poland on Friday to offer onboard abortions in a challenge to the overwhelmingly Roman Catholic country's strict laws.
The Women on Waves Foundation, which offers abortions in international waters to women in countries where they are illegal or more restricted than in the Netherlands, said the ship would dock at Wladyslawowo.
It was sure to face protests in a country where the Polish Pope John Paul, head of the world's billion Catholics and staunchly opposed to contraception, abortion and divorce, is a local hero.
"This is pure piracy," Bishop Tadeusz Pieronek, head of the Papal Academy in Krakow, told Reuters. "Even though it's happening in international waters, it's still murder."
Poland allows abortion only when pregnancy poses a threat to a woman's health, when the fetus is damaged or in the case of rape. Doctors face up to three years in jail for performing illegal abortions.
But Polish women's groups say that, despite their country's staunch Catholicism, between 80,000 and 200,000 Polish women still have illegal abortions each year, many by going abroad.
Women on Waves says a woman dies every five minutes somewhere in the world as a result of an illegal or unsafe abortion, and that it sails to countries at the invitation of local groups to provide safe and early abortions.
"NO WISH TO OFFEND"
"We respect Polish law and we don't want to offend the Polish people. It's a really difficult issue here," spokeswoman Jeannette Kruseman said. She said the group had consulted lawyers about the visit.
The Netherlands carried out 34,168 abortions in 2001, according to the latest figure available from the Dutch Health Ministry Web Site.
Women on Waves said the ship's two doctors and a nurse would take women aboard before sailing out to international waters, where Dutch law would apply, to offer counseling and abortions.
Around a fifth of the 34,168 abortions in the Netherlands in 2001 were done for women who traveled there from abroad.
The floating clinic, which set sail on Monday, is licensed by the Dutch Health Ministry and the group says its activities are all in line with Dutch law.
The clinic can provide counseling, health advice, contraceptives and an abortion pill and anaesthetic to women who are up to six-and-a-half weeks pregnant, Women on Waves gynecologist Gunilla Kleiverda said.
In the Netherlands, abortion is available on request up to 24 weeks into a pregnancy.
Women on Waves hit a raw nerve in Ireland in 2001 when its abortion ship docked in the center of Dublin. Ireland has the strictest anti-abortion laws in Europe, prompting thousands of women to travel to Britain every year for an abortion.
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortionship; amsterdam; catholic; dikes; dutch; holland; johnpaul; johnpaulii; marijuana; netherlands; pirogi; poland; polish; popejohnpaul; prolifeeurope; rotterdam; ship; thehague; thenetherlands; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: nickcarraway
Murder is murder. Just prove that the fetus is a person and Roe v. Wade crumbles.
To: nickcarraway
bump
3
posted on
06/20/2003 2:46:06 PM PDT
by
Salman
To: Righter-than-Rush
NOt "prove" that an unborn baby is a "person", rather, get the court to change it's legal definition of a "person" AND reassess the balance of rights of the mother and the child.
For all practical purposes just about all the folks on hte pro-abortion side agree with the folks on the pro-life side about what is going on.
Unfortunately, a whole lot of pro-abortion people ENJOY the killing.
4
posted on
06/20/2003 2:51:09 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
>>balance of rights of the mother and the child.>>
Well, if one gets the court to change its definition of a person, then the law would hold that parent accountable for the safety of the child. That is a step.
How do you think the court's definition of a person would lead to more 'ah ha' from mothers than in proving a fetus is a person?
To: nickcarraway
Torpedo anyone?
6
posted on
06/20/2003 3:01:04 PM PDT
by
virgil
To: Righter-than-Rush
A fetus is clearly a person, but not one protected under our laws (according to the Supreme Court). No "proof" is needed, necessary, or usable in this issue.
I would imagine several of the Justices obtained sexual release when writing the majority opinion in Roe v. Wade.
What you have to understand is that the pro-abortion crowd is not really interested in the rights of mothers - rather their interest is in having as many unborn children killed as is possible. No compromise is possible with that sort of evil.
7
posted on
06/20/2003 3:12:36 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
Compromise is not my plan. Compromise is, however, the basis of the our adversarial system of law. While you are both scientifucally and morally correct about the personhood of a fetus, and while I wish the Melinnium were here now so that God's law would rule this rock, God is not represented in the court system to any meaningfull degree.
You're right that the 'proof' and the 'truth' against abortion is already here. However, there are few absolutes in court and, as 30 Years of Roe v Wade attests, truth has nothing to do with court decisions.
Yes, I do understand the mindset and schedule of the pro-choicers, feminists and outright greedy evil. I have no doubt that this portion of society is well reflected in our government system, including politics and our courts. That said, it does not change my last question. How do you propose one course, changing the rules, would accomplish more reality checks in pregnant women, than in changing the status of the fetus?
To: nickcarraway
Perhaps the Poles should use their 877 Kilo to deal with the situation.
9
posted on
06/20/2003 3:29:19 PM PDT
by
rmlew
("Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute.")
To: nickcarraway
This type of crap doesn't go over well with the Poles.
To: nickcarraway
I hope the medical staff gets sea sickness and pukes their guts out.
11
posted on
06/20/2003 3:34:47 PM PDT
by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: Righter-than-Rush
"How do you think the court's definition of a person would lead to more 'ah ha' from mothers than in proving a fetus is a person?"
I generally don't like to post on abortion threads, though I am pro-life.
But I have to say, bump, Righter-than-Rush, to this and to your other posts on this thread.
Legal gobbledygook doesn't help. What has made a difference is technology. Now people are able to see the tiny human being, they realize it's not just a "blob of flesh".
To: nickcarraway
Life imitating art
Remember the sick jokes from 2 decades ago, screen door on a submarine, etc?
Well, now we have a real, live (Ooooh)...
Boatload of dead babies
13
posted on
06/20/2003 4:06:46 PM PDT
by
Elsie
(Any misspellings are caused by a sticky keyboard!!)
To: nickcarraway
The pro-abort feminazis wouldn't be happy until abortion is legalized around the world. They have made abortion rights their religious crusade. It must really irk those witches that 2 nations in the European Union, Ireland and Poland, still have pro-life laws.
14
posted on
06/20/2003 5:09:36 PM PDT
by
Kuksool
To: JustPiper
ping
15
posted on
06/20/2003 5:57:21 PM PDT
by
Coleus
(God is Pro Life and Straight http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/notify?detach=1)
To: nickcarraway
Sink this ship...
16
posted on
06/20/2003 6:29:26 PM PDT
by
ApesForEvolution
("The only way evil triumphs is if good men do nothing" E. Burke)
To: virgil
I'll see your torpedo and raise you two lbs of plastique...
17
posted on
06/20/2003 6:30:39 PM PDT
by
ApesForEvolution
("The only way evil triumphs is if good men do nothing" E. Burke)
To: nickcarraway
Hey Baby-butchering boaters: Your "Medical Waste" has a face.
18
posted on
06/20/2003 6:30:50 PM PDT
by
dagnabbit
(Islamic Immigration ...Why?)
To: virgil
Too bad we don't have an Admiral Rudolph!
19
posted on
06/20/2003 6:38:22 PM PDT
by
Rushian
To: nickcarraway
There's never a U-boat around when you really need one.
20
posted on
06/20/2003 10:26:07 PM PDT
by
Valin
(Humor is just another defense against the universe.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson