Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elizabeth Sherman, PhD, Harvard's Kennedy School of Government
FOXNews ^ | June 10, 2003 | The O'Reilly Factor

Posted on 06/10/2003 5:29:02 PM PDT by an amused spectator

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:36:35 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: StarFan; Dutchy; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; lonevoice; bamabaseballmom; FoxGirl; Mr. Bob; ...
FoxFan ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent FoxFan list.

21 posted on 06/10/2003 5:47:09 PM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator; doug from upland
Doug has been a mighty FR partisan in pursuing this issue over the years here.

Indeed he has.

22 posted on 06/10/2003 5:48:08 PM PDT by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Who's going to make a Juanita Broaddrick live thread?
23 posted on 06/10/2003 5:48:34 PM PDT by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
As I am sure you are aware none of this is about rape or illegal acts or breaking the law or anything else. It's about political ideology. If you subscribe to a leftist ideology and are accused of rape or any crime, you are simply innocent. If you are a conservative in hot water you are guilty until proven innocent.
24 posted on 06/10/2003 5:48:45 PM PDT by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
She kept saying that the Juanita Broadrick story was old news. Well, what is new that is in Hillary's book?
25 posted on 06/10/2003 5:50:48 PM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
I understand your rage and I agree, but sometimes when I post here, I imagine the leftist in question reading our words.

Tonight I prefer to laugh at that evil "w"itch and find her comments totally comical - in the face of cold hard facts. Juanita is FAR more believable than any Kool-Aid drinking wonk leftist. And of course the part that makes me really smile and feel smug is the fact that we're winning. We're positively kicking their fannies and they're frustrated and enraged. I just love that part - especially after eight long years of that liar with his p*nis hanging out of his shorts!

We should tell her to "put some ice on it."
26 posted on 06/10/2003 5:56:51 PM PDT by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
Wasn't Sherman some kind of diversity consultant for the Clinton Administration? If so, she can't burn her bridges, else she'll jeopardize some of those diversity or women's issues gigs for which she lives.
27 posted on 06/10/2003 5:58:52 PM PDT by Catalonia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
Lizzie will doubtless go through life frustrated by the fact that she was (one of the few) never ***ked by the Arky White Trash.
28 posted on 06/10/2003 5:59:04 PM PDT by clintonh8r (You can have no better friend and no worse enemy than a US Marine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Nice 20 year old picture
29 posted on 06/10/2003 6:04:30 PM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
I so wanted to wipe that sneering, smart-alecky, grinning smirk off her know-it-all face. Even when others were talking, she kept it up. She chose not to believe anything negative about Clinton, (or believes it and openly denies it) so she puts down anyone who would dare to smirch her hero.

I wish O'Reilly had taken the gloves off.

30 posted on 06/10/2003 6:06:26 PM PDT by Exit148 (Just added another $3.06 to the Loose Change Club collection bag for the next Freep-a-thon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
O'Reilly showed up with an empty ammo bandolier.

I agree totally. Here's what I posted on another thread:

Clinton's defenders always raise the Al Capone defense. "You got nuttin' on me copper!" No one ever proved in a court of law that Al Capone was in the mafia, that he was a part of a criminal gang, or that the ordered people to be murdered. They did get him on tax evasion instead. They got Clinton on perjury instead. That Capone was never convicted in court does mot mean that he was never in the mafia. That Clinton was never convicted in court does not prove he was never a rapist.

I suggest you look into the case of Army SSG Delmar Simpson. He was an Army instructor who was seduced by some of his female students. He maintained his innocence by virtue of the fact that he was seduced and therefore could not be guilty of rape. The Clinton Justice Department and the Army came up with a new principle to justify convicting him of rape. They claimed something called "constructive force" or the idea that because of SSG Simpson's "overwhelming power" over his students in a military training environment there was no such thing as consensual sex with a student -- it was rape even if the trainees consented. The same Clinton White House that created this new legal principle went on to deny that the President of the United States did not have any extra power over a 22-year old intern. SSG Simpson remains in prison to this day.

Clinton at any time can prove Juanita Broaddrick wrong in the details she gave. She said Clinton said "You don't have to worry about getting pregnant because I had measles in adulthood and am sterile." He confused measles with some other disease that if you get it in adulthood will make you sterile, but that's beside the point. Did he have measles in adulthood? If he did that is a detail that only Broaddrick could have known from her encounter with him. And guess what? Clinton is the only President since Eisenhower NOT to relase his medical records. His remain sealed. What is he hiding? Is he covering up the one fact that can prove Broaddrick right?

31 posted on 06/10/2003 6:06:51 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (As it is written, so shall it be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
He may have claimed to be sterile, but we don't even know if that was a lie..... Like all the rest of his mountains of lies. Frankly, I wouldn't trust the guy if he told me today was June 10, 2003.
32 posted on 06/10/2003 6:14:27 PM PDT by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
SSG Simpson remains in prison to this day

As well he should. But then so should the Arkansas Rapist and his "enabler" and co-conspirator, The Witched Witch of The East (Chappaqua that is)

33 posted on 06/10/2003 6:23:47 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
First of all, he doesn't want his records released because it will show his sinus operations for cocaine abuse - his treatments for V.D. and of course if he is sterile - it would give strong credence to the rumor that Web Hubble probably is Chelsea's father!
34 posted on 06/10/2003 6:27:38 PM PDT by M. Peach (eschew obsfucation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Of course, they will not willingly be found guilty. Anybody in the Arky gang or subsequent draftees, would be swimming with the fishes. No evidence will be given against the Clintons, if they value their lifes. There is AT LEAST rumors of anybody about to testify against the Clintons (whether about Arky drug-running, drug-using, bribery, coruption or financial scams) conventiently volunteering to leave this world immediately or a victim of random crime. Can we say withhold my knowingly prescribed heart medicine for numerous hours against strong and loud requests for such --- the WhiteWater defense.

It is very interesting that someone who during all grand jury and congressional inquiries "COULD NOT RECALL," is writing a book about her time with her husband as he is an Arkansas attorney general, governor, U.S. president. If she could not recall during sworn testimony how does she suddenly remember even enough recall her life, yet enough to write a book. Follow the money---it is nothing but a bunch of fertilizer. It should be in the fiction section.

If nothing else, the Clinton should ultimately be found guilty (someday) conspiracy to commit fraud, conspiracy to interfere with criminal investigatations, etc.... Not what they have actually done, but what they have done to hide and cover-up the crimes. Just like the Capone gang, the Possum Patch gang is good at cover-up, too.
35 posted on 06/10/2003 7:12:22 PM PDT by Jerr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
I suggest you look into the case of Army SSG Delmar Simpson. He was an Army instructor who was seduced by some of his female students. He maintained his innocence by virtue of the fact that he was seduced and therefore could not be guilty of rape. The Clinton Justice Department and the Army came up with a new principle to justify convicting him of rape. They claimed something called "constructive force" or the idea that because of SSG Simpson's "overwhelming power" over his students in a military training environment there was no such thing as consensual sex with a student -- it was rape even if the trainees consented. The same Clinton White House that created this new legal principle went on to deny that the President of the United States did not have any extra power over a 22-year old intern. SSG Simpson remains in prison to this day.

This case was discussed at length here on FR. I'll have to review the Clinton "Justice" Department's view on the matter.

Excellent comparison!

36 posted on 06/10/2003 8:32:59 PM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: lainie; dennisw; doug from upland; KPfromDerryNH; StarFan; WorkingClassFilth; All
if ever there was a USEFUL IDIOT, it is ELIZABETH SHERMAN bump!

Contrast her with the , J. Bradford DeLong, who observed clinton up close:

clinton Administration VETERAN / BERKELEY PROFESSOR: "Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life."


"My two cents' worth--and I think it is the two cents' worth of everybody who worked for the Clinton Administration health care reform effort of 1993-1994--is that Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life. Heading up health-care reform was the only major administrative job she has ever tried to do. And she was a complete flop at it. She had neither the grasp of policy substance, the managerial skills, nor the political smarts to do the job she was then given. And she wasn't smart enough to realize that she was in over her head and had to get out of the Health Care Czar role quickly.... there is no reason to think that she would be anything but an abysmal president"

J. Bradford DeLong
professor of economics at Berkeley
veteran of the Clinton Administration

What did hillary clinton know and when did she know it?
And was she part of it?
YOO-HOO missus clinton:
THE CLINTON RAPES ARE "UNBECOMING"
Q ERTY3BUMP

37 posted on 06/10/2003 8:41:19 PM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Freee-dame
Q ERTY8BUMP
Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent
CLINTON-WAS-AN-UTTER-FAILURE Containment Team Scheme FICTIONAL TRILOGY
The REAL "Living History" -- clintoplasmodial slime


Personal Agitprop-and-Money-Laundering Machine, Cozy-clintonoid-Interviews-of-the-Colmes-Kind-Scheme
Bury
REAL "Living History"

missus clinton's REAL virtual office update

38 posted on 06/10/2003 9:06:06 PM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
bump
39 posted on 06/10/2003 9:06:46 PM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Thanks, Mia.

Info back-bump:

Mickey Edwards, a former Republican congressman from Oklahoma who now teaches at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government, will join his wife, Elizabeth Sherman, director of the Center for Women in Politics and Public Policy, in discussing what issues would be addressed during the debate.

40 posted on 06/11/2003 4:30:29 AM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson