Skip to comments.
Elizabeth Sherman, PhD, Harvard's Kennedy School of Government
FOXNews ^
| June 10, 2003
| The O'Reilly Factor
Posted on 06/10/2003 5:29:02 PM PDT by an amused spectator
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:36:35 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
I just watched The O'Reilly Factor, and saw the most vile piece of Clinton-loving Stalinite scum that you'll ever have the pleasure of not meeting, name of Elizabeth Sherman, "PhD", out of Harvard's Kennedy School of Government.
These are the kind of Stalinesque historical revisionist that we're going to be faced with, sneering, mocking and sincerely believing that they can make EVERYTHING go down the memory hole.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hillary; juanitabroaddrick; stalinitelies; tenuredradicals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: StarFan; Dutchy; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; lonevoice; bamabaseballmom; FoxGirl; Mr. Bob; ...
FoxFan ping!
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent FoxFan list.
21
posted on
06/10/2003 5:47:09 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
To: an amused spectator; doug from upland
Doug has been a mighty FR partisan in pursuing this issue over the years here. Indeed he has.
22
posted on
06/10/2003 5:48:08 PM PDT
by
lainie
Who's going to make a Juanita Broaddrick live thread?
23
posted on
06/10/2003 5:48:34 PM PDT
by
lainie
To: freekitty
As I am sure you are aware none of this is about rape or illegal acts or breaking the law or anything else. It's about political ideology. If you subscribe to a leftist ideology and are accused of rape or any crime, you are simply innocent. If you are a conservative in hot water you are guilty until proven innocent.
24
posted on
06/10/2003 5:48:45 PM PDT
by
eleni121
To: an amused spectator
She kept saying that the Juanita Broadrick story was old news. Well, what is new that is in Hillary's book?
To: an amused spectator
I understand your rage and I agree, but sometimes when I post here, I imagine the leftist in question reading our words.
Tonight I prefer to laugh at that evil "w"itch and find her comments totally comical - in the face of cold hard facts. Juanita is FAR more believable than any Kool-Aid drinking wonk leftist. And of course the part that makes me really smile and feel smug is the fact that we're winning. We're positively kicking their fannies and they're frustrated and enraged. I just love that part - especially after eight long years of that liar with his p*nis hanging out of his shorts!
We should tell her to "put some ice on it."
26
posted on
06/10/2003 5:56:51 PM PDT
by
Humidston
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
To: an amused spectator
Wasn't Sherman some kind of diversity consultant for the Clinton Administration? If so, she can't burn her bridges, else she'll jeopardize some of those diversity or women's issues gigs for which she lives.
To: an amused spectator
Lizzie will doubtless go through life frustrated by the fact that she was (one of the few) never ***ked by the Arky White Trash.
28
posted on
06/10/2003 5:59:04 PM PDT
by
clintonh8r
(You can have no better friend and no worse enemy than a US Marine.)
To: dennisw
Nice 20 year old picture
29
posted on
06/10/2003 6:04:30 PM PDT
by
zip
To: an amused spectator
I so wanted to wipe that sneering, smart-alecky, grinning smirk off her know-it-all face. Even when others were talking, she kept it up. She chose not to believe anything negative about Clinton, (or believes it and openly denies it) so she puts down anyone who would dare to smirch her hero.
I wish O'Reilly had taken the gloves off.
30
posted on
06/10/2003 6:06:26 PM PDT
by
Exit148
(Just added another $3.06 to the Loose Change Club collection bag for the next Freep-a-thon!)
To: an amused spectator
O'Reilly showed up with an empty ammo bandolier. I agree totally. Here's what I posted on another thread:
Clinton's defenders always raise the Al Capone defense. "You got nuttin' on me copper!" No one ever proved in a court of law that Al Capone was in the mafia, that he was a part of a criminal gang, or that the ordered people to be murdered. They did get him on tax evasion instead. They got Clinton on perjury instead. That Capone was never convicted in court does mot mean that he was never in the mafia. That Clinton was never convicted in court does not prove he was never a rapist.
I suggest you look into the case of Army SSG Delmar Simpson. He was an Army instructor who was seduced by some of his female students. He maintained his innocence by virtue of the fact that he was seduced and therefore could not be guilty of rape. The Clinton Justice Department and the Army came up with a new principle to justify convicting him of rape. They claimed something called "constructive force" or the idea that because of SSG Simpson's "overwhelming power" over his students in a military training environment there was no such thing as consensual sex with a student -- it was rape even if the trainees consented. The same Clinton White House that created this new legal principle went on to deny that the President of the United States did not have any extra power over a 22-year old intern. SSG Simpson remains in prison to this day.
Clinton at any time can prove Juanita Broaddrick wrong in the details she gave. She said Clinton said "You don't have to worry about getting pregnant because I had measles in adulthood and am sterile." He confused measles with some other disease that if you get it in adulthood will make you sterile, but that's beside the point. Did he have measles in adulthood? If he did that is a detail that only Broaddrick could have known from her encounter with him. And guess what? Clinton is the only President since Eisenhower NOT to relase his medical records. His remain sealed. What is he hiding? Is he covering up the one fact that can prove Broaddrick right?
31
posted on
06/10/2003 6:06:51 PM PDT
by
FreedomCalls
(As it is written, so shall it be done.)
To: FreedomCalls
He may have claimed to be sterile, but we don't even know if that was a lie..... Like all the rest of his mountains of lies. Frankly, I wouldn't trust the guy if he told me today was June 10, 2003.
32
posted on
06/10/2003 6:14:27 PM PDT
by
Humidston
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
To: FreedomCalls
SSG Simpson remains in prison to this day As well he should. But then so should the Arkansas Rapist and his "enabler" and co-conspirator, The Witched Witch of The East (Chappaqua that is)
33
posted on
06/10/2003 6:23:47 PM PDT
by
El Gato
To: FreedomCalls
First of all, he doesn't want his records released because it will show his sinus operations for cocaine abuse - his treatments for V.D. and of course if he is sterile - it would give strong credence to the rumor that Web Hubble probably is Chelsea's father!
34
posted on
06/10/2003 6:27:38 PM PDT
by
M. Peach
(eschew obsfucation)
To: FreedomCalls
Of course, they will not willingly be found guilty. Anybody in the Arky gang or subsequent draftees, would be swimming with the fishes. No evidence will be given against the Clintons, if they value their lifes. There is AT LEAST rumors of anybody about to testify against the Clintons (whether about Arky drug-running, drug-using, bribery, coruption or financial scams) conventiently volunteering to leave this world immediately or a victim of random crime. Can we say withhold my knowingly prescribed heart medicine for numerous hours against strong and loud requests for such --- the WhiteWater defense.
It is very interesting that someone who during all grand jury and congressional inquiries "COULD NOT RECALL," is writing a book about her time with her husband as he is an Arkansas attorney general, governor, U.S. president. If she could not recall during sworn testimony how does she suddenly remember even enough recall her life, yet enough to write a book. Follow the money---it is nothing but a bunch of fertilizer. It should be in the fiction section.
If nothing else, the Clinton should ultimately be found guilty (someday) conspiracy to commit fraud, conspiracy to interfere with criminal investigatations, etc.... Not what they have actually done, but what they have done to hide and cover-up the crimes. Just like the Capone gang, the Possum Patch gang is good at cover-up, too.
35
posted on
06/10/2003 7:12:22 PM PDT
by
Jerr
To: FreedomCalls
I suggest you look into the case of Army SSG Delmar Simpson. He was an Army instructor who was seduced by some of his female students. He maintained his innocence by virtue of the fact that he was seduced and therefore could not be guilty of rape. The Clinton Justice Department and the Army came up with a new principle to justify convicting him of rape. They claimed something called "constructive force" or the idea that because of SSG Simpson's "overwhelming power" over his students in a military training environment there was no such thing as consensual sex with a student -- it was rape even if the trainees consented. The same Clinton White House that created this new legal principle went on to deny that the President of the United States did not have any extra power over a 22-year old intern. SSG Simpson remains in prison to this day. This case was discussed at length here on FR. I'll have to review the Clinton "Justice" Department's view on the matter.
Excellent comparison!
To: lainie; dennisw; doug from upland; KPfromDerryNH; StarFan; WorkingClassFilth; All
37
posted on
06/10/2003 8:41:19 PM PDT
by
Mia T
(SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
To: Freee-dame
38
posted on
06/10/2003 9:06:06 PM PDT
by
Mia T
(SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
To: an amused spectator
bump
39
posted on
06/10/2003 9:06:46 PM PDT
by
Mia T
(SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
To: Mia T
Thanks, Mia.
Info back-bump:
Mickey Edwards, a former Republican congressman from Oklahoma who now teaches at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government, will join his wife, Elizabeth Sherman, director of the Center for Women in Politics and Public Policy, in discussing what issues would be addressed during the debate.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson