1 posted on
06/07/2003 7:07:40 AM PDT by
harpu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: harpu
This reallt scares me!!! The democrats are going to push this thing until it explodes!!! Even my newspaper headline today was something like can Bush be trusted?? People, we HAVE to do something this is going to get out of control before we know what hit us!!!!
To: harpu
Prove he was lying about the war, FIRST. So far we've seen chemical suits which leads a rational person to believe that there ARE WMD there waiting to be found.
53 posted on
06/07/2003 9:17:52 AM PDT by
nmh
To: harpu
Which reminds me: what has become of the three Iraqi cargo ships supposedly loitering suspiciously in the Indian Ocean while being tracked by American /British intel? Have they been inspected yet? Do they even exist? I think we should be told.
60 posted on
06/07/2003 9:40:48 AM PDT by
Romulus
To: harpu
No! He was just trying to protect his family, and we are his family! :-)
Ridiculous vindictive rats! (led by Hillary, trust me)
To: harpu
I doubt that this idiot was so sanctimonious about the truth on national security matters when Algore was answering questions about illegal campaign donations from China.
Saving a few more jobs
Bill
64 posted on
06/07/2003 10:00:19 AM PDT by
WFTR
(Liberty isn't for cowards)
To: firebrand; StarFan; Dutchy; stanz; RaceBannon; Cacique; Clemenza; rmlew; NYC GOP Chick; ...
ping!
Also see posts #5 and #33
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent general interest ping list.
67 posted on
06/07/2003 10:08:08 AM PDT by
nutmeg
(USA: Land of the Free - Thanks to the Brave)
To: harpu
A president cannot stretch, twist or distort facts and get away with it. This from the Clinton News Network.
President Lyndon Johnson's distortions of the truth about Vietnam forced him to stand down from reelection. President Richard Nixon's false statements about Watergate forced his resignation.
And Clinton? Can you tell us what happened to CLINTON?????
Well whatever else you can say about President Bush's conduct during the recent war, at least he wasn't getting blow jobs from an intern under the Oval Office desk while discussing troop deployments in harm's way over the phone with a Congressman on the Armed Services Committee.
I still hope the President (and by that I mean the person who is President, and not the person who thinks he's still President) has been honest with the American people. But let's remember where Leftists lowered the standard bar, and let's not allow them to raise it on us alone.
68 posted on
06/07/2003 10:15:58 AM PDT by
JoeSchem
(Okay, now it works: Knight's Quest, at http://wwwgeocities.com/engineerzero)
To: harpu
I just sent this letter to the editor of the Dallas Morning News. I was constricted by the 200 word limit. I didn't even mention the "JFK missile gap" or the LBJ "Gulf of Tonkin" resolution but I didn't want to seem to be piling on the Democraps!!!
"To Tell the Truth
A message was received by the Japanese Embassy in Washington DC on Dec 5th, 1943. All sensitive documents were to be destroyed. The Ambassador was to meet with the Secretary of State before 2:00PM Sunday Dec 7, 1941. He was to advise that Japanese/US relations had been terminated. Thus, the attack on Pearl Harbor would not occur before formal diplomatic relations had been severed. US Naval Intelligence was intercepting and decoding Japanese diplomatic messages, but the Pearl Harbor attack was not prevented. Was this an intelligence failure? Was FDR lying to Congress when he asked for a Declaration of War because of this SNEAK ATTACK?
In 1980 Ross Perot hired a soldier of fortune who went into Tehran and rescued EDS employees. President Carter mounted a rescue attempt, which failed miserably. Was this an Intelligence failure on the part of President Carter?
President Clinton attacked a suspected chemical weapons factory in the Sudan. When he described this action was he lying? Was his intelligence faulty? The United States has paid reparations in the hundreds of millions of dollars to the owners of that ASPIRIN factory. President Clinton waged war against Bosnia. When the Chinese Embassy was bombed in Belgrade was faulty intelligence being provided to the president?
Intelligence is an imprecise adventure. Many Greek rulers visited the Oracle of Delphi in hopes of divining the future. Yet where is the Greek Empire today? For all of you soothsayers, {truth sayers?}, I need just six numbers!
To: harpu
I have got just one thing to say to the moron Mr Dean:
Well, okay, maybe two things -
70 posted on
06/07/2003 10:22:01 AM PDT by
BSunday
(My other post is a pulitzer - winner)
To: harpu
The spin here is going to be "cute," but in the end, spin doesn't find WMD, nor does it legitimize a lie
71 posted on
06/07/2003 10:24:46 AM PDT by
realpatriot71
(legalize freedom!)
To: harpu
WMD gate.
soon to join Enron gate, Halliburton gate, DWI gate, AWOL gate, and other non stories the RATS were desperate to turn into a scandal.
76 posted on
06/07/2003 10:48:59 AM PDT by
finnman69
(!)
To: harpu
Gordon Liddy needs to keep his promise and open up a big can of whoopass on Mr Deanmented.
79 posted on
06/07/2003 11:11:18 AM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: harpu
Look, where was the obligatory BARF ALERT on this piece? I guess we should consider the same, since the author is John Dean, and cnn.com is the source, but it still would be nice.
Secondly, I hope and pray the 'rats try something like this...it'd be so nice to see them deteriorate further.
81 posted on
06/07/2003 12:06:40 PM PDT by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm SO glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government.)
To: harpu
What a bunch of BS, if Saddam had no WMD programs then why are there a bunch of Iraqis with radiation sickness around a "looted" nuke facility.
83 posted on
06/07/2003 12:07:57 PM PDT by
weikel
(Baghdad Bob for DNC chairman, Sharpton for Dem nominee)
To: harpu
In the past, Bush's White House has been very good at sweeping ugly issues like this under the carpet, and out of sight. It has?
87 posted on
06/07/2003 12:22:31 PM PDT by
Republican Wildcat
(Help us elect Republicans in Kentucky! Click on my name for links to all the 2003 candidates!)
To: harpu
CNN wishes. The fact that a)Sodom violated the terms that led to the halting of PGW I, b)he kicked out inspectors while boatloads of documented, undestroyed WMDs were still unaccounted for and c)the UN (the mother of all loser organizations) unanimously voted that Iraq was in violation and steps were necessary to curb their possible intentions all lead to more than enough rationale for Sodom's regime having been dismantled. The WMD facts are well documented, regardless of if or when we find out where the WMDs are.
All the other good reasons for taking out Iraq still carry the day, because they have already been verified and corroborated. I feel strongly that the ultimate fate of the WMDs will surface in the not so distant future. Even if not, the case, based on WMDs, is easy to make.
In general, though, the RATS never have and never will play fair, so screw'em every chance we get.
88 posted on
06/07/2003 12:47:10 PM PDT by
ApesForEvolution
("The only way evil triumphs is if good men do nothing" E. Burke)
To: harpu
The regime of SoDamn Insane had 13 years to perfect the game of hide and seek with WMD that they played, yet the Rat-Ba*tards want the WMD found lickety split. It will take time but I am sure that they will find the evidence they need to show up the dumb-asses like "KKK" Byrd, Ted "Chappaquiddick" Kennedy, and the rest of those socialist fools that the DemocRATs have in their cesspool.
John dean must be on cheap drugs now!
Question - "What do you call one Democrat at the bottom of the ocean?"
Answer = "A GOOD START!"
91 posted on
06/07/2003 2:00:25 PM PDT by
Colt .45
(Cold War, Vietnam Era, Desert Storm Veteran - Pride in my Southern Ancestry!)
To: harpu
If committing perjury under oath is not grounds for impeachment and REMOVAL FROM OFFICE, then I don't understand why freeing the children from prison, ending the rape and torture of women has no significance to the Democraps and RINOs (John Dean)!
To: harpu
If Bush knowingly uttered false statements with the intent to initiate a war, then he should be impeached. But that is ine big IF!
109 posted on
06/07/2003 7:56:17 PM PDT by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(Further, the statement assumed)
To: harpu
Presidential statements, particularly on matters of national security, are held to an expectation of the highest standard of truthfulness. A president cannot stretch, twist or distort facts and get away with it. President Lyndon Johnson's distortions of the truth about Vietnam forced him to stand down from reelection. President Richard Nixon's false statements about Watergate forced his resignation. Intersting how they leave out that Bill Clinton stretched, twisted and distorted facts and got away with it.
111 posted on
06/07/2003 10:28:28 PM PDT by
Orion78
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson