Skip to comments.
JUANITA BROADDRICK COMING UP ON SEAN HANNITY!
Hannity
| 6-6-03
| DFU
Posted on 06/06/2003 12:45:54 PM PDT by doug from upland
Tune in right now. Juanita coming on after the break!
TOPICS: Announcements; Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: juanitabroaddrick; rape; seanhannity; turass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 181-184 next last
To: FreedomFlyer
How would DNA Prove rape? There is no way to prove rape 20+ years after the fact. I was trying to be as tactful as I could, which is difficult for me.
Bill Clinton may well have raped Juanita, but it really doesn't matter anymore in terms of anything useful.
To: HAL9000
Perhaps you should leave politics, anti-Clinton strategy and mind-reading to the pros. It's all yours, genius.
To: Reelect President Dubya
You are sorry that I can't let this go....How sad, that you are sad...you must be a sad person...I am not thick of skull...do not need any criminal science lectures from you....of course, DNA is impossible now....but multiple "passed" polygraphs by most of the Clinton accusers would force liberals back away from the evil duo, and would seal in the minds of most Americans that this sorry lying low life is a rapist. And spare me the "polygraphs are not accepted in most courts" speech....it is NOT the legalities that I am talking about...it is convincing the American citizens of the true nature of the Rico President and his hit-man wife. It is important to history that both the media that protected them, and the liberals who made excuses for them, are exposed so that America understands the damage done.
To: doug from upland
That was brilliant, albeit evil, on Kendall's part.Yet another effective liar, part of the Clinton minions.
Interesting...so many female defenders of Hillary have come out saying they believe her about the Monica debacle. Juanita would be ground up by them and destroyed. I understand why she didn't speak up when it happened and why she still wouldn't today. (Remember Paula Jones.) And Lanny Davis (on FNC the other night) keep saying how HONEST Hillary is. Bill Clinton! <----my new curse words, related to bull hockey
124
posted on
06/06/2003 7:54:11 PM PDT
by
arasina
(Thank God the White House now has plenty of CLEAN laundry!)
To: Impeach the Boy
It is important to history that both the media that protected them, and the liberals who made excuses for them, are exposed so that America understands the damage done. You have my permission to do so.
Goodbye and good luck.
But mostly just "goodbye."
To: arasina
oops.
AR?
To: ladyinred
Don't cha just wonder what Betsy Wright is thinking about now? It gives me the creeps that Hillary assigned her to delve into bill's pathetic, morally weak and astoundingly dirty out of control sexual hunger.
Being reminded once again of Betsy's job ala hitlery, brings home my memory of Georgie boy Stephanopoulis's job in klinton's first presidential campaign. It was widdle georgie who was given the task of calling and THREATENING past girlfriends (or one nighters, whatever) for old billy the grunt.
Yeah. Ol grubby bill.
And poor unsuspecting hitlery (we have to pretend here that Betsy never existed, of course, and suspend all knowledge of jennifer flowers as seen on national TV, too...ridiculous) was so shocked at Monica that she just had to blame the vast right wing conspiracy so that Katie Colic could sympathize with her...PATHETIC. ( And I guess Paula was just as much a throwaway to hitlery as billy dale was.)
Seems hitlery really does think that we are completely stupid-us of the undereducated, gullible, truly stupid American masses who so need her power mad, socialistic vision to fulfill and enhance our pathetic little lives.
Oh gag me-I need a drink!
To: Republic
Oh gag me-I need a drink! I'll have one of whatever you're having. Good to see you again. I'm doing fine too.
To: Slyfox; doug from upland
"Someone had made the comment that she had said that she talked to her lawyer son and concluded that she couldn't do anything about it. I am not disputing what she did. I would have done the very same thing. But, why did she conclude that she could do nothing? Precisely, because Clinton filled her with fear............................................................ I made a comment that didn't sit well with you. I KNOW that what she did was not consensual. How dare you infer that I would even suggest that!!"Slyfox, I've been out to dinner so I am late in responding.
At posting #38 you quoated doug from upland, where he said: "It was the 70s. Attorney general. She allowed a man to come to her room. It was his word against hers. A no win for her. Son is attorney. He advised her that she had no choice.
You then said; " I'm just curious though, even with consensual sex, wouldn't biting someone on the upper lip during sex be considered assault if the woman decided to press charges?"
It appears that we have miss comunicated all the way around.
If you had been more familiar with the situation you would have known that doug from upland was refering to her son being a lawyer now (as he was a child in the 70's) and telling her that to try to press charges when this all came out, a couple of years ago, it would be a no win situation because the statute of limitations had run out.
You ask, how dare I enfer that you might be refering to it having been consensual. Well, look at what you asked. We were talking about Juanita and you said; " I'm just curious though, even with consensual sex wouldn't biting someone on the upper lip during sex be considered assault if the woman decided to press charges?"
Now the way I took that was that you were saying even if she couldn't get him on rape, because it might have been consensual surely she could have gotten him on assault.
Oh and another reason I assumed you were male is because you used the term "penetrated her with fear". That seemed very odd terminology to me if it was coming from a female freeper.
Sorry for our miss communication.
129
posted on
06/06/2003 8:24:06 PM PDT
by
Spunky
(This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
To: Spunky
"Can't we all just get along."...Rodney King.
Good answer. I think it was just miscommunication.
130
posted on
06/06/2003 8:31:22 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Martha is indicted and the Clintons still walk free.........what a country)
To: doug from upland
Maybe this has already been stated, but how do you know this, and how is that possible? I thought they were in a room alone.
To: Slyfox
I had the balls to step up to some meely-mouthed women, in the jury room I was sharing with them, who thought the perp should just have his hands slapped.I've got jury duty Monday. I will keep this in mind. I'm not a fan of hand slapping.
132
posted on
06/06/2003 8:44:23 PM PDT
by
lizma
To: I'm ALL Right!
"........but how do you know this, and how is that possible? I thought they were in a room alone." How does doug from upland know that the Attorney General of Arkansa witnessed the rape.
Because the Attorney General of Arkansas was Bill Clinton himself.
133
posted on
06/06/2003 8:51:36 PM PDT
by
Spunky
(This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
To: Spunky
even with consensual sex wouldn't biting someone on the upper lip during sex be considered assault if the woman decided to press charges?" You misunderstood. I was not referring to Juanita when I made up the example. Whether or not, any sex is consensual, shouldn't a woman be able to press charges if a guy bites the hell out of her upper lip?
134
posted on
06/06/2003 8:56:33 PM PDT
by
Slyfox
To: I'm ALL Right!
Maybe this has already been stated, but how do you know this, and how is that possible? I thought they were in a room alone.
======================================
I was just trying to be cute. Bill was the attorney general at the time, so the attorney general of Arkansas was indeed a witness to the rape.
135
posted on
06/06/2003 9:03:02 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Martha is indicted and the Clintons still walk free.........what a country)
To: Spunky
Whoops, I missed your response and answered the same question about how the attorney general was a witness to the rape he committed.
136
posted on
06/06/2003 9:04:23 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Martha is indicted and the Clintons still walk free.........what a country)
To: Slyfox
"Whether or not, any sex is consensual, shouldn't a woman be able to press charges if a guy bites the hell out of her upper lip?",I can just see it now.
Officer, we were just having consensual sex and then he bit the hell out of my lip.
The other consensual sex partner says, Officer she was somewhat tipsy and tripped over the shows there by the bed and smacked her lip.
Who you going to believe?
137
posted on
06/06/2003 9:09:24 PM PDT
by
Spunky
(This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
To: doug from upland
"Whoops, I missed your response and answered the same question..."That's all right. If we read everything before we respond, we may never get to the response. :-)
138
posted on
06/06/2003 9:12:32 PM PDT
by
Spunky
(This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
To: Mia T
Ping.
To: Reelect President Dubya
"Bill Clinton may well have raped Juanita, but it really doesn't matter anymore in terms of anything useful."
It IS USEFUL for discrediting the Clintons. That's politics.
Bush can stay twelve arm lengths away from it. But if it harms the image of beloved, cheated-upon but still lying Hillary, then let the games continue.
That's politics. Image counts.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 181-184 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson