Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FREEP CBS for False "Gay Marriage" Claims on Amazing Race
Self & Worldnetdaily | 6/4/2003 | Andrew Ainsworth & Joe Kovacs

Posted on 06/04/2003 1:51:53 PM PDT by Vitamin A

Friends,

The Amazing Race is one of the most popular TV shows. Unfortunately, CBS has chosen to use the term "married" to describe the relationship of two males from California who are featured on that show. As such, CBS is effectively broadcasting to the nation that "marriage" between two men is valid and exists, despite the fact that NO state in the U.S. recognizes two men as being "married" to each other. At most, Vermont has recognized a "civil union" between two males, but that law was expressly designed not to use the term "marriage" or "married." California and Hawaii have given rights to "domestic partners," but likewise have expressly NOT used the word "marriage" or "married" to describe them.

CBS's intentional use of the term "married" to describe two males from California is an outright misrepresentation--i.e., a lie--for political purposes. I have friends whose children have been confused and questioned their parents when they see the "married" word come up under the male couple as they appear on the TV screen (not to mention the male couple's kiss in the show's intro). My friends, and I, certainly do not appreciate CBS's decision to turn marriage on its head during primetime viewing just to push a political agenda.

Below, I've posted an article which details CBS's lamest of lame non-excuses for using the "married" term.

I am writing to encourage you to take just a minute to express your opinion on this matter to CBS. You can do so by going to www.cbs.com. Go to the bottom of the homepage and click the "Feedback" button. An email frame will pop up on your screen and allow you to provide a comment.

Please pass this along to friends if you feel so inclined.

-Andrew

Culture: CBS Married Gays in Race?

WorldNetDaily May 29, 2003 Source: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=32814

MEDIA MATTERS CBS television thrusting 'married gays' on public Network's 'Amazing Race' promotes real-life men as joined in matrimony Posted: May 29, 2003 1:00 a.m. Eastern By Joe Kovacs © 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

CBS Television is promoting tonight's debut of "The Amazing Race 4" by proudly proclaiming a male homosexual couple on the show to be married to each other.

The primetime reality show features 12 teams of two people with a pre-existing relationship racing around the world in a quest for a million-dollar prize.

'Married' male couple on CBS

In current promotional ads on the air, the network touts one of the teams - consisting of two men - as ''The Married Couple.''

"Yes, they are a married, gay couple," a CBS spokeswoman tells WorldNetDaily. "They're married and they're gay. Is there an issue?"

On the show's website, viewers are encouraged to click on biographical links for the teams, to learn more about their personal lives. The write-up on the "married" male couple includes the following:

Twenty-eight-year-old Reichen is a pilot and teaches at a flight school in Los Angeles. A former U.S. Air Force officer and a graduate of the U.S. Air Force academy, he is married to his teammate Chip. He loves skiing and flying and is very into being physically fit. He describes himself as "detail-oriented, caring and thrill-seeking." He speaks French and has traveled internationally quite a bit. Reichen's views on relationships are much more liberal than Chip's - He enjoys flirting with other guys, but that makes Chip upset. Owned by Viacom, CBS says "Amazing Race" has previously featured "gay" contestants, but this is the first time it's trumpeting homosexuals as actually being married to each other.

"They bring a tremendous amount of enthusiasm into the show. They're great!" says the network.

When WorldNetDaily pressed CBS to find out more about the alleged matrimony of its contestants, the network explained that's what Reichen and Chip had written in their application to be on the program.

"Why can't they say they're married? What's the difference?" said the CBS spokeswoman. She went on to state she "believe[d] it's legal in certain states," though she did not specify where the Californians had any binding ceremony, if in fact they had one at all.

Family advocates are blasting CBS's marketing move, saying there's no such thing as legal homosexual marriage in the U.S.

Robert Knight

"Two men is not a marriage. It's pretend marriage," says Robert Knight, a former news editor at the Los Angeles Times who is now director of the Culture and Family Institute.

"This is profoundly dishonest and is intended to persuade Americans that so-called 'gay marriage' is already a reality, when no jurisdiction in America has legalized it."

While there's no government sanction for homosexual marriages, the state of Vermont has approved what it calls civil unions, the legal equivalent to marriage in everything but name. Two other states - California and Hawaii - have approved laws regarding benefits of domestic partners.

But many other states are passing legislation to resist the status of homosexual marriages.

On Tuesday, Texas became the 37th state to approve a law preventing the legal recognition of same-sex unions that have been sanctified by a government elsewhere.

"Like the vast majority of Texans, I believe that marriage represents a sacred union between a man and a woman," Gov. Rick Perry said in a statement.

For broadcast television, homosexuality is not a new concept.

Sean Hayes portrays homosexual on 'Will & Grace' (NBC)

Sitcoms like ABC's "Ellen" and NBC's "Will and Grace" have been among the first programs to put "gays" and lesbians in the limelight, and just this week, the cable channel Bravo - owned by the NBC division of General Electric - announced its summer launch of TV's first homosexual dating series, "Boy Meets Boy."

"As bad as 'Ellen' and 'Will and Grace' have been, ['The Amazing Race' married-homosexual promotion] is an outright lie," said Knight. "This is the worst we have seen from the broadcast networks. ... It's another reason why the big networks are losing viewers, and people are gravitating toward alternative news sources such as WorldNetDaily and the Fox News Channel."

Knight suggests people objecting to this and other programs log onto websites like OneMillionMoms.com and OneMillionDads.com, which provide links for viewers to contact broadcasters and advertisers.

American Express is one of the advertisers to have had high-profile tie-ins with "The Amazing Race," and while the company no longer has its "Moment of the Week" promotion, it says its current slate of commercials will continue to appear on CBS.

"We are a global company and advertise on a wide variety of programs through a number of different media to reach a diverse audience - current as well as potential customers," American Express spokeswoman Monica Beaupre told WorldNetDaily.

Other large companies which have had special advertising segments on previous "Amazing Race" series include Royal Caribbean Cruises, T-Mobile and Kodak.

As WorldNetDaily reported in October, Kodak is proud of its commitment to diversity, which includes homosexuality, even firing a 23-year Kodak veteran after he objected to a pro-homosexual memo circulated in the company's e-mail.

Leslie Moonves, president and CEO of CBS-TV says the network is committed to displaying diversity in the shows it airs:

As broadcasters, we aim to ensure that our national viewing audience is reflected in our programming and our people. We recognize that a workforce comprised of a wide variety of perspectives, viewpoints and backgrounds is integral to our continued success.

This is not a campaign, but rather a fundamental way of doing business at CBS, and we continue to be steadfast in our goal to become more diverse and more representative of the public we serve.

Tonight's season premiere of "The Amazing Race" airs at 8 p.m. Eastern Time, in what's considered to be the family portion of primetime. Officials say previous episodes have drawn an estimated audience of 9 million viewers.

"There's a buzz about the show, but we have not received any calls one way or another about the participants," said Joe Barnes, director of marketing at KOIN-TV, the CBS affiliate in Portland, Ore.

In San Francisco, a market with a large homosexual population, the CBS owned-and-operated station KPIX-TV speculates more people will be talking about the "gay marriage" angle once the program is broadcast.

"We've heard nothing from gays saying 'Thanks,'" said KPIX spokeswoman Akilah Monifah. "We've also heard nothing from homophobic types saying, 'How could you?' either."

* * * * * * * * *


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: adamandeve; dontbendover; gaytrolldolls; hollyweird; homosexualagenda; idolatry; mediabias; notadamandsteve; overreaction; seebs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last
To: Darksheare
SeeBS
81 posted on 06/05/2003 2:16:22 AM PDT by weegee (NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS: CNN let human beings be tortured and killed to keep their Baghdad bureau open)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
....I just cancled my American Express Card that I carried for 15 years. Flat out told them I would not support a company that sponsers the Gay Agenda! She asked me what I was talking about, (DUMB!)I answered the misleading advertising of a married gay couple on the show Amazing Race.....OKAY she says! GUESS THEY DON'T CARE!



She's a minimum wage worker in a call center who has been trained to look through screens. She may not even be directly employed by AMEX.
82 posted on 06/05/2003 2:21:57 AM PDT by KCmark (I am NOT a partisan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Qwerty
Well, at least you got "true homosexual" right.

But that doesn’t mean you can’t change.

As madg used to say.. there are more proclaimed "alien abductees" than ex-gays.

madg was excellent at sophistry wasn’t he? He use to compare childbirth with fisting too. He no more knew whether change is possible than the man on the moon because he’s never tried to.

I already read the twin studies; too bad they don't prove your point.

Of course they do, why would you say that?

As for your link to the brain studies, it's a cache and the links don't work.

Darn I knew that would happen. I don’t know why Nader Kalantar’s research study isn’t on the UCLA server anymore but I know most of the flaws in the Hammer, LeVay, Swaab and Hofman and the Prenatal Hormonal Hypothesis studies so maybe we can discuss these one by one.

83 posted on 06/05/2003 4:50:29 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
What about cats? Can't cats marry too?
84 posted on 06/05/2003 4:56:01 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Van Jenerette
...for Sociology class.
85 posted on 06/05/2003 8:25:26 AM PDT by Van Jenerette (Our Republic...If We Can Keep It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Vitamin A
they can call themselves the Brilliant Princes of the Magical Rainbow Wonderland if they want to.

And I bet they do!

86 posted on 06/05/2003 8:37:31 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Vitamin A
He speaks French and has traveled internationally quite a bit

No doubt! Maybe a little Greek too???


87 posted on 06/05/2003 9:00:54 AM PDT by texson66 ("Tyranny is yielding to the lust of the governing." - Lord Moulton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tangerine
The term "virgin" is not a legal term, unlike the term "married" which is a legal term. Hence, no need for any "state" to "certify" that the "virgin" team members are in fact virgins.

In addition, there's no danger in misleading children into believing that two non-virgins are in fact virgins. What would be the harm? There is, however, danger in misleading children into believing that two men can be "married"--which is against the law.
88 posted on 06/05/2003 10:18:30 AM PDT by Vitamin A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Qwerty
Qwerty, this thread wasn't intended to re-open the never-ending debate on the morality of homosexuality or whether homosexuals can change, etc.

My point in starting this thread was simply to address a separate issue, i.e., whether it is misleading to viewers (especially children) for CBS to describe two males as being "married" to eachother when no state in the U.S. recognizes "marriage" between two men. Being that the terms "married" and "marriage" are legal terms, and that no one is "married" unless the law recognizes them as such, I see no justification--only a transparent political motive--for CBS's use of the "married" term to describe Reichen and Chip.

As for your personal sexuality, I'm perfectly comfortable leaving that topic alone. It's frankly no one's business, and I don't really care enough to know about it anyway.
89 posted on 06/05/2003 10:27:50 AM PDT by Vitamin A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

Comment #90 Removed by Moderator

To: Emmylou
Emmylou, you're just proving my point. Marriage is a LEGAL term. Common law marriage only exists when the LAW says it does. Hence the name, COMMON LAW marriage.
91 posted on 06/05/2003 11:33:39 AM PDT by Vitamin A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Vitamin A
Is CBS a tee-vee show or something?
92 posted on 06/05/2003 11:33:42 AM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Vitamin A
Emmylou, the California Constitution says that marriage only exists between a man and woman. California is not a common law marriage state. But even if it were, the California Constitution would prohibit the notion of a "common-law gay marriage" because that would not be a male-female marriage.
93 posted on 06/05/2003 11:36:03 AM PDT by Vitamin A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

Comment #94 Removed by Moderator

To: Vitamin A; markcowboy
"Qwerty, this thread wasn't intended to re-open the never-ending debate on the morality of homosexuality or whether homosexuals can change, etc."

You're right. Maybe you'd want to address this post to other people who took it off on a tangent, like the poster I was responding to... markcowboy. Or do you consider his post on topic?

95 posted on 06/05/2003 2:29:13 PM PDT by Qwerty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: markcowboy
"But tell me.....are you 100% certain that homosexual fantasies are not rooted in a mis-directed sex drive?"

First, I want to say that you and I will have to fight this out another time, as Vitamin A is correct in saying that our conversation is off topic.

As for being 100% certain that homosexual fantasies are not rooted in misdirected sex drive, no of course I can not claim to know such a thing.

But you can't, either.

I'm out to get a few things done with my day, hope to see you around to fight it out later. ;-)

96 posted on 06/05/2003 2:34:57 PM PDT by Qwerty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Vitamin A
I dont give a dam^ what they do JUST LEAVE CHILDREN OUT OF IT PERIOD !
97 posted on 06/05/2003 6:12:48 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK (ONLY DEAD FISH...... "GO WITH THE FLOW")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson