Posted on 05/28/2003 2:51:04 PM PDT by presidio9
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:42:39 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
HIGH ON the list of the world's shamefully ignored problems is the Congo civil war, going on five years. Faraway battlegrounds, intractable feuds and a diamonds-and-gold black market collude to kill hopes of finding peace.
Europe and the United States may be dazzled by the high-tech walkover that was the Iraq War, but the conflict of Congo is more typical of modern warfare: Throwaway land mines, gun-wielding children and massacres of families are accepted tactics of warlords who answer to no one.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
AfricaWatch:
To find all articles tagged or indexed using AfricaWatch, click below: | ||||
click here >>> | AfricaWatch | <<< click here | ||
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here) |
CIA -- The World Factbook -- Zimbabwe
First it was Rhodesia then SA now America paying the price of silence.
-A Capsule History of Southern Africa--
Parallels between Apartheid SA & USA today | ||||||
ZWNEWS.com - linking the world to Zimbabwe MPR Books - Don't Let's Go to the Dogs Tonight: An African ... Title: "Cry, the Beloved Country" - Topics: World/South Africa The Coming Anarchy -South Africa - The sellout of a nation-- FYI, I wrote this a while back: I don't know what will happen in southern Africa beyond a general breakdown into chaos & anarchy... the old bugbear was the Soviets gaining control of the tip & choking our fleet's movements, coupled with control of the mineral wealth. Now it look like Quaddaffi is angling to take over Rhodesia and perhaps spread to South Africa. At this point, we are 20 years too late, but we can at least bear witness to the debacle. Bear in mind I am a partisan- I supported ( with reluctance ) the old white-minority governments in Rhodesia and South Africa, because I knew the Communists and their puppets- including proxies like Cuba- were angling for control of southern Africa. One big problem we have is our media. They have tried to portray the situation in southern Africa as a clone of our own civil-rights struggles when in fact just the opposite was true. Africa is degenerating into chaos and anarchy under the guise of "liberation" and "one man, one vote." What I used to tell people was that while Apartheid was an onerous, offensive system, I would prefer being a black South African under Apartheid to being a person of any color under the old Soviet system- and I still believe those words to be true and correct. Given time, the old South African government would have worked out its problems- but it was not allowed to do so. Today, we are seeing the results of this folly in Zimbabwe- or rather, we see what tiny bits the web and small elements of talk radio cover. The whole story of contemporary Africa is a sad tale of tribalism, class warfare, kleptocracy, and massive corruption- and one the media here "won't even talk about" because it does not fit within their template of acceptable ideas. I would also add, that both the press and entertainment arms of the media encouraged and supported the toppling of the old governments, i. e., they were in collusion, and complicit in the fall. Now that things have worked out at variance with their idealistic fantasies, they simply "don't talk about it..." "Why do you keep posting this stuff? Nobody cares about Africa, anyway..." Clive, Cincinatus's Wife, blam, myself, and a few others get asked that occasionally- we are among the keepers of the "AfricaWatch" columns, and we continue to post articles about what I believe will prove to be one of the great, tragic stories of the new century. The mainstream press never publishes more than one Africa story a day, and it's usually some fluff or dodge around how grim the situation is over there. But the truth is archived here on Free Republic, and I maintain that one day, when things over there are too awful to be ignored any longer, those who have eyes to see will read the stories here, and be appalled at the silence. That is all...
backhoe |
I disagree with you. We went into Iraq to topple monsters who supported terrorism, may have already provided WMD to terrorist groups and were preventing efforts to stabilize the middle east.
We only got into the freedom business in Iraq AFTER we knocked off Saddam's "government" and to assure the country doesn't go back into the terrorism business.
We have no compelling national interest for going into the Congo - and won't IMHO. We have no strategic interest there and the region is not a terrorist threat to the U.S. End of story.
One reason I worried about the humanitarian rhetoric for the war was that it would commit us to playing policeman in every forgotten corner of the world, like here. Unfortunately, it's ovbious that if we don't do something meaningful, no one else is going to in our stead.
Going in may not be practical, but the situation in Africa truly tugs at the heartstrings.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.