Posted on 05/26/2003 7:07:15 AM PDT by George Frm Br00klyn Park
WorldNetDaily / Commentary
Bush tax package guts middle class
Posted: May 26, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern
By Joan Veon
© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com
Using tactics of deceit and distortion, President Bush will sign a tax bill that was literally dictated by him to Congress and passed by the Senate late last week while the writers were still crafting it. What is being put into action will not only completely gut our entire tax code but will add a level of taxation that heretofore was only known by the children of Israel when pharaoh commanded them to make bricks without straw.
The tax deductions have been sold to the American people as creating more jobs but the truth of the matter is that Congress feels you and I are not paying enough in taxes. What Bush has done, Clinton could not have ever gotten away with: a tax on everything we buy otherwise known as a Value Added Tax for you and I.
If you think you pay a lot in tax now, just wait and see what the Republicans or should I say, "neocons" have in store for us. Let me give you a glimpse.
First, a Value-Added Tax system is a more "purer" form of tax because it is structured like the morning dew it will tax everything and every process . For example, currently you are not taxed on the activity (not the gain but the activity) of buying or selling a house. Under a VAT, we will be taxed. Currently you are not taxed for the professional services of our doctor and dentist those services will have a tax.
The basic structure of a VAT is that it is essentially equivalent to a tax on wages and pure profits in other words, it is a superior form of tax. In fact, it is a "vertical" tax depending on how the VAT is structured, every phase of manufacturing and production will be taxed. Currently it is not taxed. For example, the farmer who grows sheep will pay a tax to buy the sheep, then, when he sells the sheered wool, the weaver who buys it from the farmer will pay a tax on that purchase. When the weaver who spins the wool into fabric sells it to a pants factory, the processed wool will be taxed. When the factory sells the pants to the department store, another tax will be levied. At each phase, while there may be some offset in the tax between the various stages of production, you will be taxed on the cost of the shirt which also includes the tax that was paid at each phase. Will the price of the shirt increase absolutely! So will the cost of living.
According to the International Monetary Fund, the VAT is a more modern tax, providing the ability to tax each phase of production and also the turnover of goods and services, thus increasing the cost to live while providing a greater income stream to the government. A VAT is basically sustainable development at its finest. Government can't continue spending unless it increases its income stream!
Now this brings me to another point the need for government to increase their income. Do you remember John Maynard Keynes and his socialistic "Keynesian economics"? Essentially, back in 1933 when America went into a major depression, Franklin Roosevelt relied on the "innovative" thinking of Keynes who recommended deficit spending to create new jobs. Well, 70 years later, every level of government in the United States is broke.
Currently, the U.S. government is $7 trillion in debt. Democrats, who have opposed this bill from the beginning, project that under the weight of the huge tax reductions being given to the very wealthy, that by 2013 when it is fully phased in, our debt will rise to $12 trillion or $36,000 for every person in the United States. Basically the July tax rebates we are going to receive will help contribute to this figure.
Nothing like paying one credit card with cash from another!
Furthermore, instead of you and I paying taxes and receiving a service, we now live in a time when our government is privatizing (selling its assets to reduce its debt), changing the code so it can increase its income while reducing services to you and I. Under the current tax system, mortgage interest and charitable contributions are deductible. These will have to be sacrificed to provide the government with a greater and constant income stream. Simply put, a "pure tax" is basically "squeezing" the turnip which is you and I.
So how does a government with a VAT increase revenue? In order to switch to a VAT from our current system of taxing income, the tax brackets of the rich will be reduced from 38.5 percent gradually over a 10-year period to the targeted 21-27 percent VAT rate. This level of taxation is the level that will produce the same amount of tax under our current system. At the same time, the tax brackets of those who have an income of $1 million and above is being reduced, those who currently don't pay tax because they have too little income will have be subjected to an increasing tax bracket which may start out at 10 percent but will have to rise to meet the brackets of the extremely wealthy at 21-27 percent. Is your back breaking yet?
So what if, in this time of never-ending war on terrorism, the government still does not have enough income? Well, then the rate can be increased. For example, in 1973 when England introduced the VAT, it started at 10 percent ... today it is up to 18.5 percent.
Lastly, the president and his cabinet are unwilling to even admit that they are gutting the current system and putting a VAT in place that will benefit those like Warren Buffet who calculated that he will save $300 million while his secretary's tax rate will increase. This tax bill should be more accurately called, "The Gutting of the Middle Class."
Joan Veon is a certified financial planner and is president of Veon Financial Services, Inc., an investment advisory firm. Visit her website, WomensGroup.org.
THIS article at WND
Then why bother with it? Because the levels can easily be increased down the road.
NRST is best.
I agree. It is best. That's why it'll never happen.
Most of these discussions are way over my head. So speak slowly :)
If we go from an Income Tax to NRST aren't I going to be taxed twice? The money was taxed when I made it, now it's going to be taxed highly once again as I spend it.
How will we ensure that once a NRST is in place that we will not get an income tax too?
The money was taxed when I made it, now it's going to be taxed highly once again as I spend it.
You get taxed on it again when you spend it as it stands right now, with the current income/payroll tax system.
DO YOU PAY YOUR INCOME TAX
AT THE SUPERMARKET?
by D. Sherman Cox J.D. L.L.M. Taxation
The full impact of the federal tax system(taxes in gross wage/salaries & other compensation + business income/payroll taxes) added onto the base(taxfree) price of retail consumption goods and services is 36% for federal taxes alone.
The NRST replaces all income and payroll taxes now in place. As such, businesses will no longer be hit with taxes such and the costs of complying with the tax code that are all embedded into the price of the goods and services you buy now will go away and you will receive your full gross paycheck to boot.
Doing away with these tax costs of business will allow shelf price of goods and services to drop 20-30% depending upon particular product, the NRST is placed upon that new price. See Reply #74 above for references on that. Since the NRST is 23% (taking the place of income & FICA taxes) and prices will fall a similar amount, the net result will be that people will be able to purchase the same amount of goods and services NRST + Shelfprice as they do now with taxes & compliance costs embedded in the price of product. The difference being you receive a receipt detailing the NRST and price of products separately.
Second, under the NRST proposal all legal residents will receive the Family Consumption Allowence, which takes the place of personal exemption and standard deduction of the income tax leaving the up to the povertyline of expenditure untaxed. See Reply #60 above.
Third, only money spent on retail new goods and services will be subject to the tax. Money that is saved or invested, and reinvested earnings are not taxed. Thus whatever you choose to invest or save will remain untaxed.
The net effect of the above will provide more than a 15% advance in standard of living in the United States.
How will we ensure that once a NRST is in place that we will not get an income tax too?
1st, the NRST repeals the all income and payroll taxes;
2nd, the NRST legislation mandates the destruction of income tax related files and documents;
3rd, the NRST legislation defunds the IRS, and provides for the transfer of NRST tax administration to state government.
4th, the NRST legislation calls for the repeal of the 16th amendment and expressed prohibition of all income and payroll taxes.
The rest is up to the American people to see it done, and keep it that way.
Take your time and read through the list.
Regarding this question "How will we ensure that once a NRST is in place that we will not get an income tax too?" I will simply paste text taken directly from HR 25, The FairTax bill and you can judge for yourself!
SEC. 301. PHASE-OUT OF ADMINISTRATION OF REPEALED FEDERAL TAXES.
(a) Appropriations- Appropriations for any expenses of the Internal Revenue Service including processing tax returns for years prior to the repeal of the taxes repealed by title I of this Act, revenue accounting, management, transfer of payroll and wage data to the Social Security Administration for years after fiscal year 2007 shall not be authorized.
(b) Records- Federal records related to the administration of taxes repealed by title I of this Act shall be destroyed by the end of fiscal year 2007, except that any records necessary to calculate Social Security benefits shall be retained by the Social Security Administration and any records necessary to support ongoing litigation with respect to taxes owed or refunds due shall be retained until final disposition of such litigation.
It's strange that all of the "hidden costs of taxes" for the suppliers is listed as (the bogus) 25 to 33+% of the gross amount paid, yet the shirt cleaner(s) themselves are paying (passing on) less than 2% of their gross. Even the shirt cleaners profit is a more realistic 5+% compared to the other bogus costs your "economists" claim.
If (as your "economists"(?) claim) the suppliers were passing on 25% of their gross in federal tax, they would have to have 75% taxable profit at a 33% tax rate...(.333 X 75 = 25)
See how impossible if not stupid it all looks now?
Your claim of 20 to 30% reduction in prices is impossible and an outright lie.
If (as your "economists"(?) claim) the suppliers were passing on 25% of their gross in federal tax, they would have to have 75% taxable profit at a 33% tax rate...(.333 X 75 = 25)
All the costs to them are passed on in price, that includes the federal taxes embedded on their labor costs, FICA, excises, tariffs, all the taxes passed to them by the prices they pay to their suppliers and laborers who they pay. The entire tax bill is passed through to the final product purchased by a consumer. That tax bill accumulates to a total of 36% added on to the price of goods where taxes were not levied at all.
The 23% that prices can fall are due to the federal taxes plus cost of complying with federal taxes throughout the chain of production of suppliers to the final retailer as well as the retailer himself. The producers of his chemicals and supplies, the transporters of those supplies, and their suppliers all contribute to the cost of the final product purchased by the consumer.
Corporate income tax of one retail company selling the final is but a fraction of the total federal tax burden embedded in any retail product.
The full burden embedded in products we buy when all the cost of government is actually included, state & federal, is actually closer to 70%. The small portion of 20-23% is only that which applies to federal taxes that the chain of production bears not counting in the taxes remitted by their laborers that are embedded in wages & salaries.
The total bill embedded in the cost of goods and services, includes all taxes paid from wages, businesses, and the costs of regulations impressed on us from both federal a state.
Federal taxes 22.4% of income(taxfoundation)
Fed Compliance costs 14.8% (Paine)
State & local taxes 11.8% (taxfoundation)
State Compliance costs 7.4% (Paine)
Regulatory costs 12.7% (Hodges,Crain)70.1% of your income is now consumed by government
If govenment were magically removed from the equation, the cost of products would be 30% of what they are with government doing its thing.
See how impossible if not stupid it all looks now?
Your strawman certainly does look impossible and stupid.
The price of a product includes all the costs that go into its manufacture, or the business soon ceases its existence.
Why do you suppose that simple truth is SO hard for some to grasp?
Recent history of rising costs (especially fuel and taxes) and falling prices will dispute that...Maybe you haven't heard about deflation fears.
That still doesn't prove your fallacy of 20, 30, 40% reduction in prices. Businesses don't pay 20,30, 40% of their gross income in federal taxes as you clowns continue to imply.
Only profit and gains are taxable. If a business was making an unheard of 20% profit and paying 38% tax rate the best you could do is 7.6% of the gross...
So let's do real math.
7.6% reduction in price, then
Increase the price 30% for your sales tax and you have,
an INCREASE in price(s) (cost of living actually) of 20+%.....
Oh and BTW, it doesn't matter how many businesses in the supply chain are passing on their 7.6% of their gross in tax, it's still only 7.6% of the gross in the final product...It isn't a VAT/income tax like you would like other mindless fools to believe.
Let's just say that the effective tax rate for the business is 5% of sales. At four stages of production, the overall taxes in the final price is just under 22% ( 1.05 ^ 4 = 1.216 ). For an 8% effective tax rate, the VAT effect is 36% of the final price.
Now, we're talking on average here. It's easy to point to a particular service (no manufacturing chain) business and its overall federal tax rate, and say "see, this 20-40% number is wrong" -- what we are talking about is that when looking at all businesses, the average embedded tax is in this range.
. If a business was making an unheard of 20% profit and paying 38% tax rate the best you could do is 7.6% of the gross...
A tax on profit is not the tax the NRST repeals, you have left out the payroll taxes paid by the company, the 65 cents of costs to comply with tax laws for every dollar collected by government, and the taxes and costs embedded in the prices the company pays to its suppliers for goods and services.
The entire chain accumulates to a total of 20 - 30% producer price reductions for just those business taxes and the costs attendant with complying with them repealed by the NRST.
You like to pretend the only tax of interest is the business income tax. It is only one of many and not even the major tax most businesses pay, even though it is one of the most costly for them to comply with.
The NRST repeals all income and payroll taxes not just corportate income tax you like to spin.
Of all federal taxes, only excises & tariffs (which comprise less than 6% of the total federal tax take) are not repealed by the NRST. Along with the taxes repealed, the costs of complying with them disappear as well.
The result of repealing those taxes and the removal of the costs of complying with them is what results in 20-23% reduction in producer prices since business do not pay the NRST on their purchases. The NRST is only collected from the final retail customer.
Your attempt to limit the analysis to only corporate income taxes paid by the retailer, is incomplete and totally erroneous. That retailer, must include the total costs of taxes passed on to him in the prices of the materials and services he purchases to deliver a product to you. The cummulative sum of all costs to provide a retail product to the consumer must be reflected in the price of that product.
Sorry lewislynn, but your analysis simply falls short of the real situation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.