Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peterson had called girlfriend
The Fresno Bee ^ | Published Saturday, May 24, 2003, 5:53 AM) | John Cote and Garth Stapely

Posted on 05/25/2003 7:33:51 AM PDT by runningbear

Peterson had called girlfriend

Peterson had called girlfriend
Suspect in killing of Laci Peterson talked with Amber Frey after she went to police.

By Garth Stapley and John Coté
The Modesto Bee
(Published Saturday, May 24, 2003, 5:53 AM)

MODESTO -- Scott Peterson talked with his girlfriend four weeks after his pregnant wife was reported missing, according to court documents filed late Friday. The wiretap documents reveal that Scott Peterson called Amber Frey and discussed his hiring of a private investigator. The call came late on Jan. 20, almost a month after Frey had gone to police to tell them about her romantic relationship with Peterson, and four days before she went public with the information.

The documents also reveal that authorities intercepted 69 calls between Peterson and his Modesto attorney and two calls between Peterson and his private investigator.

In other developments Friday:

Two sources confirmed autopsy information that Laci Peterson's body was recovered without its head and feet.

A woman from the Petersons' neighborhood who resembles Laci Peterson told The Modesto Bee she was not pregnant when Laci went missing. Defense sources said the woman could not have been mistaken for Laci Peterson by potential witnesses interviewed in the investigation.

Prosecutors filed the wiretap documents late Friday in an apparent attempt to explain that they had inadvertently intercepted telephone conversations Peterson had with his attorney and investigator.

Because monitoring attorney-

client and investigator-client discussions is illegal, prosecutors wrote that they immediately stopped listening in most cases and did not learn anything "substantive."

The attorney, Kirk McAllister, called the eavesdropping "worse than underhanded" and vowed to "pursue this fully and vigorously."

He said Peterson's defense team will review the documents this weekend and consider asking the Superior Court to throw out double-murder charges against Scott Peterson.

Peterson, 30, is charged with murder in the deaths of his wife, Laci, and their unborn son, Conner. She was eight months pregnant when family members reported her missing from the couple's Modesto home on Christmas Eve.

The wiretap documents state that a judge referred to Peterson as a suspect, though police insisted that he was not a suspect -- nor had he been ruled out -- before his arrest April 18.

Stanislaus County Superior Court has sealed the original wiretap recordings, and a district attorney's investigator has copies.

But prosecutors in District Attorney James Brazelton's office say they have not listened to them, preferring to have the court sanction their release to the prosecution and defense. Otherwise, the recordings should be kept secret, prosecutors argue.

Judge Al Girolami is set to take up the matter Tuesday.

On Jan. 20, while tapping Peterson's cellular phone, investigators heard him tell Frey about his private investigator and say that a tabloid newspaper also had tried to hire the investigator, according to the documents.

Authorities apparently disclosed the conversation to explain why they erroneously intercepted Peterson's discussions with the private investigator. They simply had not known before that he was working for Peterson's defense team, investigators wrote.

They also wrote that Peterson's mother, Jackie Peterson, offered to pay the private investigator and her son accepted. Authorities listened to that conversation as well.

On the autopsy details, one source close to the investigation said in addition to the missing head and feet, significant parts of Laci Peterson's torso were missing.

"There were no organs, no skin, nothing from the belly button up to the chest area," said a source familiar with the autopsy report, which a judge has sealed from public review.

Two forensic experts, however -- without having seen the autopsy -- offered differing opinions on whether the body might have been mutilated before being dumped in the San Francisco Bay.

"The absence of parts of [Laci Peterson's] body says to me it was dismembered before being placed in the water," said Dr. Michael Baden. He is a New York forensic pathologist who worked on O.J. Simpson's defense team and helped Chandra Levy's family after the Modesto woman's remains were found in Washington, D.C.

But Dr. Gregory Schmunk, Santa Clara County coroner, said news of the headless torso "doesn't surprise me at all." He said it's perfectly natural for tidal activity, boat propellers and feeding animals to break apart bodies.

As for the Laci Peterson look-alike, two people who insist they saw the pregnant Laci Peterson walking her dog after 9:30 a.m. Christmas Eve now have a reason to believe they are right after Mark Geragos, Peterson's lead attorney, said the neighborhood woman who resembles Laci Peterson "debunks [the prosecution's] whole theory."

The woman, who has since moved, has a golden retriever named McKenzie -- the same breed and name as the Petersons' dog.

But the woman, who asked not to be identified, said she is sure she did not walk her dog on Christmas Eve because her husband's two sons were at their home preparing to go shopping that day.

"I'm 99.9% sure I was not walking that day," said the woman, who is a prosecutor in another county.

She said she was no longer pregnant in December, suggesting that the woman walking on Christmas Eve most likely was Laci Peterson.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Week's bay search in Peterson slaying ends Authorities refuse to talk about what they were looking for

Week's bay search in Peterson slaying ends Authorities refuse to talk about what they were looking for

Henry K. Lee, Chronicle Staff Writer Saturday, May 24, 2003

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Richmond -- Divers hunting for more evidence in the slaying of Laci Peterson and her unborn child wrapped up their weeklong search of San Francisco Bay on Friday.

The divers, assisted by high-tech sonar devices, had been scouring a section of the bay off Richmond since May 16. Authorities declined to say what they were looking for in the murky waters or whether they had found anything that would bolster their case against Peterson's husband, Scott Peterson.

"Barring unexpected developments, the search of the bay will not be conducted over the Memorial Day weekend," Stanislaus County District Attorney Jim Brazelton, whose office is prosecuting Scott Peterson, said in a statement Friday. "Police may return to the bay at a future date."

The searchers included dive teams from the Marin County and Contra Costa County sheriff's departments, Modesto police and the U.S. Coast Guard.

The search area was not far from where the decomposed bodies of Laci Peterson, 27, and her unborn son washed ashore last month near Point Isabel in Richmond. Published reports have said that not all of Peterson's remains were found, and that her body may have been wrapped in plastic and weighted with heavy material.

Scott Peterson was charged last month with two counts of murder and could face the death penalty if convicted. He told police he had gone on a fishing trip off the Berkeley Marina on Christmas Eve, the day his pregnant wife was reported missing.

The 30-year-old fertilizer salesman has pleaded not guilty and remains jailed without bail.

The end of the search came as the legal team defending Scott Peterson indicated it had found an unidentified woman whom defense attorney Mark Geragos had said could shed light on the case.

Reports have surfaced that defense attorneys are trying to build a case suggesting that Laci Peterson may have been abducted from her Modesto neighborhood by someone other than her husband. The defense team is reportedly looking for a tan van seen near the Petersons' home on Christmas Eve.

Geragos and prosecutors have declined to comment publicly about the theories.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lawyers push for Peterson records

Posted on Sun, May. 25, 2003

Lawyers push for Peterson records

By Brian Anderson
CONTRA COSTA TIMES

Lawyers for the Contra Costa Times and two other newspapers will argue Tuesday that search warrant information relating to the arrest of Scott Lee Peterson should be released to the public.

Peterson was arrested April 18 and charged with killing his wife, Laci Peterson, and the couple's unborn son. The woman, who was eight months pregnant, vanished Dec. 23 or 24.

In the days and weeks after Laci Peterson was reported missing, investigators served a series of search warrants on a warehouse, boat, truck and trailer that Peterson used. A Stanislaus County judge also allowed police to examine phone records and the Peterson home, where officials believed Laci Peterson was killed, court records showed.

Attorneys for the Times, San Jose Mercury News and the Modesto Bee have said in court papers that there is a compelling public interest in the case that should dictate disclosure of the documents.

But lawyers on both sides of the criminal case have fought newspaper requests to release eight returned search warrants, an arrest warrant and affidavits supporting the documents. Publicity surrounding the case could hurt a continuing investigation as well as Peterson's right to a fair trial, prosecutors and defense lawyers have argued.

On June 3, Judge Roger Beauchesne will decide whether another series of search and arrest warrants relating to the Peterson case should be unsealed.

Three days later, Judge Al Girolami will hear a motion brought on behalf of reporters whose conversations over certain telephone lines relating to the Peterson investigation might have been recorded.

Officials with the district attorney's office mailed out notices earlier this month to reporters at multiple news organizations stating that their calls might have been intercepted. Conversations Scott Peterson had with his lawyers also were intercepted, officials said.

---------------------------------------------------------

Scott Peterson's Parents Convinced Son Innocent

AMERICAN MORNING

Scott Peterson's Parents Convinced Son Innocent

Aired May 23, 2003 - 08:07 ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.

BILL HEMMER, CNN ANCHOR: Heidi, Scott Peterson's parents are convinced their son is innocent and they want the world to know about it. Peterson is accused of murdering his wife Laci and their unborn son. In the new issue of "People" magazine just on stands today, Scott's parents, Jackie and Lee Peterson, say their son is not the monster the media has made him out to be.

So, why, then, the preemptive P.R. strike?

Anne Marie O'Neill, senior editor for "People," is here to tell more about the Peterson interview.

Good morning to you.

ANNE MARIE O'NEILL, SENIOR EDITOR, "PEOPLE" MAGAZINE: Hi.

HEMMER: Their only son of Jackie and Lee.

Why did they agree to talk?

O'NEILL: I think they're doing what any loving parents would do. They think their son is innocent. He's really being given a bad rap in the press, rightly or wrongly we won't know until the trial. But they're basically coming out and trying to say that he really was a good husband and father.

HEMMER: What you will find in this issue of "People" is a lot of pictures Scott as a kid. You say these strike you. Why?

O'NEILL: I think it's really striking to look at Scott growing up and to just see a really normal boy, from a very happy family. And obviously that's why the pictures are out there, from the parents' point of view. But, you know, it really does portray, you know, incredible normality in his upbringing. You look at it and you think, well, OK, could this guy kill his wife?

HEMMER: Mark Geragos is the attorney right now. We know he's very media savvy. He's been here on CNN many, many times. There he is in video.

Is he training the parents right now on how to address reporters like yourself?

O'NEILL: I would suggest he is. You know, I don't know. I haven't been witness to any of that. But I'd suggest he is because, you know, as you said, he's really media savvy. He knows the questions we're going to ask. He knows the answers he wants out there.

HEMMER: What is his, what is he basing this theory about a satanic cult? Where does he get this information and what is the facts that he believes could support such a theory?

O'NEILL: What he believes and what he is floating out there is this theory of the brown van that was on the street before Laci Peterson disappeared. There is a woman who he says he has who claims she was almost abducted by the guys in the brown van. And the other piece of evidence that he has come up with is that Laci Peterson and another woman who was abducted more than a year ago, a woman by the name of Hernandez, both disappeared on what he says are high holy days in the satanic church.

HEMMER: So he's done his research?

O'NEILL: He's done his research, yes.

HEMMER: Even though it sounds a bit farfetched, would you not agree?

O'NEILL: Yes, oh, well, I mean, you know, believe him or not, people are listening.

HEMMER: Let's talk about the suit, the clean shaven Scott Peterson that we now see right now in court.

Did the parents address the possibility, if he is found guilty, he could pay for this crime with his life? Have they thought about that yet?

O'NEILL: I think they've probably thought a lot about that and I think that's part of what's motivating them to get out there and talk.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For further indepth info on May 27th hearing, Press Release

(Excerpt) Read more at fresnobee.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: lacipeterson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-249 next last
To: scripter
That and over zealous district attorneys are of great concern to some folks, especially those found guilty for crimes they didn't commit.

I have more trouble with the DA's than with the cops. I expect the cops to be the front-line troops who have to fight the war. I expect the DA's to exercise some judgement in what they prosecute and how they go about doing it. They know better. Supposed to.

But, like you say, that is not always how it works.

41 posted on 05/25/2003 9:25:12 AM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
I'm with you on this. Is this a conservative poltical topic or just news for Modesto?

Will this story like Levy turn out to ruin a cheaters life and prove that the police are not very good at finding killers if they are not family or sexual partners? Will this turn out to be gossip?

Why would the police give out details of a wire tap? This looks like they don't have good evidence so they want this guy to look guilty.

42 posted on 05/25/2003 9:35:40 AM PDT by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Because monitoring attorney- client and investigator-client discussions is illegal, prosecutors wrote that they immediately stopped listening in most cases and did not learn anything "substantive."


In most cases? Hmmmm what did they hear in the cases that they didn't stop listening?



He said Peterson's defense team will review the documents this weekend and consider asking the Superior Court to throw out double-murder charges against Scott Peterson.>

Should this be considered the first time the defense asks for the charges be dropped? Be interesting to keep a tally.

43 posted on 05/25/2003 9:44:09 AM PDT by oceanperch (Hipublicans live here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: q_an_a
Why would the police give out details of a wire tap? This looks like they don't have good evidence so they want this guy to looks guilty.

Well, the police and the DA's office sometimes do land on someone. Usually they are right. They may have evidence, but it may not be enough. So they fabricate some more.

I'll give you fifty cents for every cop you can find who has never lied on the witness stand. I don't think I'll be paying you much. Maybe enough to get a cup of coffee at Starbucks.

It is the DA's office that is the problem. When they get locked into convicting someone, they won't let go even when they are clearly wrong.

44 posted on 05/25/2003 9:53:23 AM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
ding ...ding...ding....you've won, your on the jury team...lol. Such great insights... lol....
45 posted on 05/25/2003 9:53:56 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: q_an_a
not quite the police gave the info, by law they have to notify those whose conversations were intercepted, and notify them. In this case, Media lawyers want to know, and hear what is on the wiretaps, therefore the motions are before a court hearing, and pending that outcome, will be either admonished or admitted into evidence. I should say, also the lawyers who were also intercepted have that right too, and final for investigations if a law was broken on privileged or privacy rights..(that is my take on it)
46 posted on 05/25/2003 9:59:26 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: oceanperch
I say, let them do and file all they want...weed out what can be admitted, or charges stay, or defendent is released.... Come on Mark, lets hear all ya got... 'o)
47 posted on 05/25/2003 10:01:02 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
When it comes to actually physically ransacking a guy's house, I want the cops restrained and careful, but when a wiretap is authorized, they should be able to collect all they can get and let the legal eagles sort it out afterwards. This doesn't apply to just this kind of domestic murder case. Wiretaps can and probably HAVE prevented major terrorist attacks...and on that level I don't want someone fiddling with the pause button when an attorney is on one end of the line.
48 posted on 05/25/2003 10:06:01 AM PDT by ChemistCat (Disney won't see another cent of our money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: oceanperch
There is a provision in the wiretapping laws that allows the investigator to ascertain from intercepted calls if the parties are planning or conspiring to plan illegal activities. That pertains to attorney calls with limitations. While LE cannot monitor for the entire duration, they are allowed to make spot monitoring of the attorney/client phone calls. At a judge's request, the MPD quit doing any spot monitoring after two phone calls of 69 to/from McAllister and SP.

The procedure that they used to avoid violating SP's rights is detailed in length HERE Warning it's a 31 page pdf. file. So if one is inclined to believe the sketchy press reports and McAllister's hot air then one should,also, take the time to read what MPD says actually happened with those calls.

49 posted on 05/25/2003 10:08:18 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
"Dan Abrams was on the Today Show this morning and he said the defense is going to go after the character of Amber now."


Interesting tactic. But I would think VERY hard to do without further impugning Scott's character.
50 posted on 05/25/2003 10:11:05 AM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: justshe
Why would they do that if she doesn't know something very damning? Other than that he was having an affair--which he has admitted.
51 posted on 05/25/2003 10:12:16 AM PDT by ChemistCat (Disney won't see another cent of our money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ChemistCat
well, all I can say is during the Clinton era, Janet Wacko Reno, was given multi agency task force to enforce or apprehend crimes. Meaning, maybe not Modesto had initial thoughts to use wire taps, but remember, the FBI was in this case from Dec 27th search warrants, so I suspose, since my crime readings, they are good at this. But, I tell you something, none of this would of occurred, if 1)scott didnt' kill his wife and child, and 2)scott's behavior and refusal to cooperate lead investigators to the roles they played out. Then this story would of stay low keyed until either Laci was found alive, an other suspect found, or Laci came back after having Conner. None of which occurred except Laci and Conner did come back, against their wishes, dead. Which is why the media is so involved in this crime saga caper... Scott caused it, and the media disected him.

I don't think any sane human being would enjoy media spouting every thing you ever did in your lifetime.... Scary!! ;o)

52 posted on 05/25/2003 10:17:26 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Is it too late to be a volunteer? I'll bring my own rifle and ammo.......and save the State a buck or two.
Bye Bye to these two.
53 posted on 05/25/2003 10:17:31 AM PDT by ASOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: All
Who goes fishing in SFB in December? Ain't nothing there. Sturgeon possibly, but you have to go way up the east end to get them. The fishing trip story won't hold water.
54 posted on 05/25/2003 10:19:34 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ASOC
ouch! I tell ya, you have to be mental to be wanting to die by gun shots... errie!!
55 posted on 05/25/2003 10:20:27 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ChemistCat
I can't figure out HALF of the motives for what the defense is doing.

And if, as has been reported, they have tapes of telephone conversations between Scott and Amber, I cannot understand how attacking her character will somehow negate the impact of those tapes. I would like to hear the source of Dan Abrham's contention that this is yet another tactic the defense will employ.

I can't see the advantage. But I will be the first to admit, my "imagination" may not be as creative as the defense teams---specifically MG's.
56 posted on 05/25/2003 10:20:28 AM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
bookmarking....
57 posted on 05/25/2003 10:21:58 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ChemistCat
If I was wiretapping someone's phone, I don't know if it would always be clear up front that attorney-client privilege applied on a conversation...and just because you stop recording doesn't mean you stop listening.

What plausible circumstances could there be where a call placed by the defendant to his attorney's office number, or from the attorney's office to the client, would be of legitimate interest to the police, but not be privileged? And how hard can it be, through the use of Caller I.D., for the police to identify these calls before anyone even picks up the receiver?

58 posted on 05/25/2003 10:22:01 AM PDT by Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: oceanperch
Let's not forget "THE Mystery Woman".

Gera-gross has told us he has found this woman who will clear Scott.

So, do we all fake amnesia? Or should we hold Mark's feet to the fire and demand he put up or shut up?

PS. Don't count on Geraldo, (aka, "Mr. Faithful" who's been married 6 times, and can't keep his pants zipped and is a self proclaimed womanizer)..for unbiased investigative reporting concerning the Mystery Woman. Heck, he probably suggested the alibi to Gera-gross, LOL.

sw

59 posted on 05/25/2003 10:22:52 AM PDT by spectre (Spectre's wife (Where's the Mystery woman, Mark? Still in Rehab?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
"I guess it was too much to hope for the FR to be a Scott Peterson free-zone."

There's no reason it should be. It is news. If you don't want to read about it, then DON'T click on the topic. Otherwise keep you cold hearted comments to yourself or accept to be ridiculed for your insensitivity.

I want the news on this tragedy. Laci Peterson needs to be vindicated. I'd like to have some of my faith in the justice system restored and have the murderer of this beautuful, young woman and her innocent baby given the death penalty.

60 posted on 05/25/2003 10:28:38 AM PDT by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-249 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson