Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abortion providers may lose (Planned Parenthood to lose funding in Texas)
Houston Chronicle ^ | May 23, 2003 | POLLY ROSS HUGHES

Posted on 05/23/2003 7:10:49 AM PDT by Buffalo Bob

AUSTIN -- Abortion providers who also offer cancer screening and other preventive care services to thousands of poor women would lose all state funding under a measure budget writers adopted Thursday night.

The vote, six Republicans in favor to four Democrats opposed, came after some lawmakers expressed serious objections that poor women in many parts of Texas would have nowhere to turn for cancer and sexually transmitted disease screening.

Budget Conference Chairman Rep. Talmadge Heflin, R-Houston, said the purpose of the new budget measure is simple and clear. It is to limit abortions.

"If the contractor wishes to provide the (other health services), they stop doing abortions," he said. "There is absolutely nothing in the rider that reduces services to any provider that does not do abortions."

Of course we're disappointed," said Rebecca White, senior vice president of Planned Parenthood of Houston and the Southeast. "We know that tens of thousands of women will be displaced from their current medical home."

White predicted Planned Parenthood would lose as much as $3.5 million in the Houston area while statewide the organization would lose as much as $13 million. Earlier the group estimated 110,000 women could lose reproductive and family planning services as a result of the measure.

Sen. Steve Ogden, R-College Station, offered the budget rider, which would give providers a year to adjust to the change before funding is withdrawn.

White said Planned Parenthood plans to comply with any new rules the Texas Department of Heath issues while still trying to make abortions available. It was not clear whether the agency could offer abortions in some clinics and not in others.

"I think it's going to create more harm than good," said Rep. Sylvester Turner, D-Houston.

Laredo Democrat Sen. Judith Zaffirini said she opposed the measure even though she considers herself against abortion.

"I still believe it is too far-reaching," she said, noting women would be denied far more than abortion services.

Sen. John Whitmire, D-Houston, also questioned the rider's impact, particularly in the Gulf Coast area.

"It would be bad in my judgment for health services to be lost," he said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: abortion; all; birthcontrol; cancer; funding; judybrown; loosespelling; loseano; planned; plannedparenthood; pregnancy; sanger; stopp; texas; tx
Satan's minions are going to have to find their blood money elsewhere. It should have been this way all along.
1 posted on 05/23/2003 7:10:49 AM PDT by Buffalo Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
Pro-Life SPOTREP
2 posted on 05/23/2003 7:11:52 AM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vic3O3
Ping, you might page the Pro Life crowd.

Semper Fi
3 posted on 05/23/2003 7:24:22 AM PDT by dd5339 (Lookout Texas, here we come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
"I still believe it is too far-reaching," she said, noting women would be denied far more than abortion services.

So, am I to understand that if the Gov't isn't paying for it, women will not have health services?
Geez, lady! You should think before you speak.

4 posted on 05/23/2003 7:45:47 AM PDT by Ignatz (Scribe of the Unwritten Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz
...women would be denied far more than abortion services.

This a good example of an outright lie by Laredo Democrat Sen. Judith Zaffirini, and so dang typical. This article makes clear that only abortion providers will be cut off. These women can simply go elsewhere for these other services.

5 posted on 05/23/2003 8:01:49 AM PDT by Buffalo Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
Did I read this right? If PP can't get state funding to murder unborn babies they won't provide any "vital" health services? True colors shine through the darkest souls. Their organization's name is very misleading.
6 posted on 05/23/2003 8:04:17 AM PDT by whereasandsoforth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
PP is in business to make money off their abortions, both from the procedure itself and often from the sale of the resulting body parts of the unborn child.

THAT is why they would rather not receive funding and close down their services vs. just stop offering abortions.

7 posted on 05/23/2003 8:28:12 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
Abortion providers who also offer cancer screening and other preventive care services to thousands of poor women would lose all state funding . . .

The Nazi Party, which offers excellent career opportunities to otherwise poor and downtrodden Aryans . . .

8 posted on 05/23/2003 8:37:22 AM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
Cutting funding to Planned Parenthood is a good way to cut government spending.
9 posted on 05/25/2003 12:31:04 PM PDT by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
STOPP Planned Parenthood
10 posted on 05/30/2003 1:32:54 PM PDT by Coleus (God is Pro Life and Straight http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/notify?detach=1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson