Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can Annika make the cut? Friday's action at Colonial (LIVE DISCUSSION)

Posted on 05/23/2003 6:42:28 AM PDT by 1Old Pro

  PGA TOUR Leaderboard
Last Updated: 09:34 am Projected cut: 1


Customize the leaderboard


Bank of America Colonial Round 2
 
Watch TOURCast    Sort by name to easily track your favorite players! PGATOURShop.com
                       
Position Player Name
First/Last
Scoring Rounds Total
Score
  Current Start Today Thru To Par 1 2 3 4
  1 1 Rory Sabbatini 8:58CT - -6 64 - - - 64
  T2 T2 Mark Calcavecchia* E 2 -5 65 - - - 65
  T2 T2 Patrick Sheehan* 1:54CT - -5 65 - - - 65
  T4 T6 Brett Quigley -1 4 -4 67 - - - 67
  T4 T6 Phil Mickelson -1 1 -4 67 - - - 67
  T4 T4 Dan Forsman* 1:10CT - -4 66 - - - 66
  T7 T6 Glen Day E 4 -3 67 - - - 67
  T7 T6 Stephen Ames E 2 -3 67 - - - 67
  T7 T6 Chad Campbell* E 2 -3 67 - - - 67
  T7 T22 Rocco Mediate* -1 2 -3 68 - - - 68
Get PGA TOUR info. on your AT&T Wireless phone! Dial #121,say "sports" then "PGA TOUR"
  T7 T6 Craig Parry 8:25CT - -3 67 - - - 67
  T7 T6 Spike McRoy 8:25CT - -3 67 - - - 67
  T7 T6 Brian Watts 8:47CT - -3 67 - - - 67
  T7 T6 Duffy Waldorf 12:15CT - -3 67 - - - 67
  T7 T6 Olin Browne* 12:26CT - -3 67 - - - 67
  T7 T6 Stewart Cink 12:37CT - -3 67 - - - 67
  T7 T6 Jay Williamson* 12:37CT - -3 67 - - - 67
  T7 T6 Mike Sposa 12:59CT - -3 67 - - - 67
  T7 T6 Loren Roberts 1:10CT - -3 67 - - - 67
  T7 T6 J.J. Henry* 1:32CT - -3 67 - - - 67
  T7 T6 Brandt Jobe* 1:43CT - -3 67 - - - 67
  T22 T40 Pat Bates -1 2 -2 69 - - - 69
  T22 T22 Kenny Perry* E 1 -2 68 - - - 68
  T22 T4 Jesper Parnevik* 2 1 -2 66 - - - 66
  T22 T22 Matt Gogel* 8:25CT - -2 68 - - - 68
  T22 T22 Jim Furyk 8:36CT - -2 68 - - - 68
  T22 T22 Marco Dawson* 8:58CT - -2 68 - - - 68
  T22 T22 Tim Petrovic* 12:15CT - -2 68 - - - 68
  T22 T22 Esteban Toledo 12:26CT - -2 68 - - - 68
  T22 T22 Brian Gay 12:26CT - -2 68 - - - 68
  T22 T22 Frank Lickliter II 12:48CT - -2 68 - - - 68
  T22 T22 Jeff Sluman 12:48CT - -2 68 - - - 68
  T22 T22 Corey Pavin 12:59CT - -2 68 - - - 68
  T22 T22 Rich Beem 1:10CT - -2 68 - - - 68
  T22 T22 Justin Leonard 1:21CT - -2 68 - - - 68
  T22 T22 Luke Donald 1:21CT - -2 68 - - - 68
  T22 T22 Billy Andrade 1:32CT - -2 68 - - - 68
  T22 T22 Greg Chalmers* 1:32CT - -2 68 - - - 68
  T22 T22 Cliff Kresge* 1:54CT - -2 68 - - - 68
  T40 T40 Bob Tway E 4 -1 69 - - - 69
  T40 T54 Tom Byrum* -1 4 -1 70 - - - 70
  T40 T40 Billy Mayfair* E 4 -1 69 - - - 69
  T40 T22 Jeff Brehaut 1 2 -1 68 - - - 68
  T40 T40 Bob Burns E 1 -1 69 - - - 69
  T40 T40 Steve Flesch 8:36CT - -1 69 - - - 69
  T40 T40 Kirk Triplett* 8:47CT - -1 69 - - - 69
  T40 T40 David Frost* 8:58CT - -1 69 - - - 69
  T40 T40 Joey Sindelar* 12:26CT - -1 69 - - - 69
  T40 T40 Per-Ulrik Johansson 12:37CT - -1 69 - - - 69
  T40 T40 Jay Haas* 12:37CT - -1 69 - - - 69
  T40 T40 Len Mattiace 12:48CT - -1 69 - - - 69
  T40 T40 Scott Verplank* 12:48CT - -1 69 - - - 69
  T40 T40 Gene Sauers* 1:10CT - -1 69 - - - 69
  T40 T40 Harrison Frazar 1:32CT - -1 69 - - - 69
  T55 T73 Brent Geiberger* -1 2 E 71 - - - 71
  T55 T54 Tom Pernice, Jr. E 1 E 70 - - - 70
  T55 T54 Nick Price 8:25CT - E 70 - - - 70
  T55 T54 Fred Funk* 8:25CT - E 70 - - - 70
  T55 T54 Joe Durant* 8:36CT - E 70 - - - 70
  T55 T54 Peter Lonard* 8:47CT - E 70 - - - 70
  T55 T54 Brian Henninger 8:58CT - E 70 - - - 70
  T55 T54 Brenden Pappas* 8:58CT - E 70 - - - 70
  T55 T54 Briny Baird* 12:15CT - E 70 - - - 70
  T55 T54 Paul Goydos 12:26CT - E 70 - - - 70
  T55 T54 Woody Austin* 12:37CT - E 70 - - - 70
  T55 T54 Cameron Beckman* 12:59CT - E 70 - - - 70
  T55 T54 Shigeki Maruyama* 1:21CT - E 70 - - - 70
  T55 T54 Alex Cejka* 1:54CT - E 70 - - - 70
  T69 T54 Dudley Hart 1 3 1 70 - - - 70
  T69 T99 Jonathan Kaye* -2 3 1 73 - - - 73
  T69 T54 J.P. Hayes 1 1 1 70 - - - 70
  T69 T73 Hal Sutton E 1 1 71 - - - 71
  T69 T54 John Rollins* 1 1 1 70 - - - 70
  T69 T73 Tim Clark 8:47CT - 1 71 - - - 71
  T69 T73 Shaun Micheel 8:58CT - 1 71 - - - 71
  T69 T73 Skip Kendall* 12:15CT - 1 71 - - - 71
  T69 T73 John Senden* 12:26CT - 1 71 - - - 71
  T69 T73 Tim Herron 12:37CT - 1 71 - - - 71
  T69 T73 Chris Smith 12:59CT - 1 71 - - - 71
  T69 T73 Jonathan Byrd* 12:59CT - 1 71 - - - 71
  T69 T73 Lee Janzen* 1:21CT - 1 71 - - - 71
  T69 T73 Scott Simpson 1:32CT - 1 71 - - - 71
  T69 T73 Dean Wilson 1:43CT - 1 71 - - - 71
  T69 T73 Annika Sorenstam 1:43CT - 1 71 - - - 71
  T69 T73 Carl Pettersson* 1:43CT - 1 71 - - - 71
Projected Cut: 1
  T86 T54 Brandel Chamblee* 2 4 2 70 - - - 70
  T86 T54 Carl Paulson 2 3 2 70 - - - 70
  T86 T87 Mark Brooks E 1 2 72 - - - 72
  T86 T87 Sergio Garcia* 8:36CT - 2 72 - - - 72
  T86 T87 Pat Perez 8:47CT - 2 72 - - - 72
  T86 T87 Geoff Ogilvy* 8:47CT - 2 72 - - - 72
  T86 T87 James McLean* 9:09CT - 2 72 - - - 72
  T86 T87 Heath Slocum 12:15CT - 2 72 - - - 72
  T86 T87 Stuart Appleby 1:10CT - 2 72 - - - 72
  T86 T87 Steve Elkington* 1:10CT - 2 72 - - - 72
  T86 T87 Peter Jacobsen* 1:32CT - 2 72 - - - 72
  T86 T87 Aaron Barber 1:43CT - 2 72 - - - 72
  T98 T87 David Peoples 1 3 3 72 - - - 72
  T98 T99 Craig Perks 8:36CT - 3 73 - - - 73
  T98 T99 Bob Estes* 8:36CT - 3 73 - - - 73
  T98 T99 Ian Leggatt* 12:48CT - 3 73 - - - 73
  T98 T99 Joel Edwards 1:21CT - 3 73 - - - 73
  T103 T106 Robert Gamez* -1 4 4 75 - - - 75
  T103 T87 J.L. Lewis* 2 3 4 72 - - - 72
  T103 T106 Rod Pampling* -1 2 4 75 - - - 75
  T103 T99 Tom Lehman* 1 2 4 73 - - - 73
  T103 105 Scott McCarron* 1:21CT - 4 74 - - - 74
  T108 T106 Dan Pohl* 9:09CT - 5 75 - - - 75
  T108 T106 Fulton Allem* 12:48CT - 5 75 - - - 75
  T110 T110 Kevin Sutherland* 8:25CT - 6 76 - - - 76
  T110 T110 Arron Oberholser 12:15CT - 6 76 - - - 76
  T110 T110 Keith Clearwater* 1:43CT - 6 76 - - - 76
  113 113 Rod Curl* 9:09CT - 8 78 - - - 78
  - - David Toms Withdrawn - - - - -
  - - Ben Crane Did not start


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 961-980981-1,0001,001-1,020 ... 1,041-1,044 next last
To: commish
I'm a little split on the topic.

With respect to the whole affair, it's still only a game.

Nothing more than a rich man's version of 'Kick the Can'.

PGA purses seem as thought they can get to be about 10 times the size as LPGA.

I really don't see any difference in the course work, except the men's PGA rounds tend to run 20-50 yds further back on the black tees, instead of the blues. In some respects, that simply favors a more wirey, long driving player.

Greens might be more shaped on the PGA, but then again PGA players have wimped out and not played PGA West Stadium in favor of Pussyville Landmark, so PGA players really aren't so studly as to claim they have the tougher courses.

IMHO, a really good golfer should be able to place the ball within 5 ft of the cup on every approach shot. But instead, longer courses tend to favor the long hitter who is sloppy near the green. The really good golfers get squeezed out because some group of morons who simply learned some balance and swinging through the ball early on in their career, even using a baseball swing, could overcome their inaccuracy.

IMHO, Tiger Woods needs to be countered by a golfer who can place the ball within a foot of the cup every time his approach is within 150 yds. Accordingly, I see nothing keeping women from performing that same degree of skill.

Technically they aren't "woman's" tees and "men's" tees, they are simply different colored tees.

One could modify the rules based upon other metrics to even allow different starting tees regardless of sex and still have a fair game. "Longest drive" competitions might not apply with that modification, but most log hitters I've seen, aren't that spectacular within 150yds. In other words, I'll consider myself good when I drop 50% of my approach shots into the cup without putting.

I recognize 'pros' look at the odds of hitting the right shot, and opt to take the safe shot, but then again, dang-it, if the pro isn't hitting the right shots, then just who the hell is going to hit them.

My idea of a greeat game of golf is simply to drive about 200 yds each tee shot and drop the ball into the cup on every approach within 150 yds or at least lip the cup. I haven't seen any pros do that yet, so if Annika or any other woman can do that at a PGA tournament, more power to them.
981 posted on 05/23/2003 6:06:30 PM PDT by Cvengr (0;^) He chipped the can off the curb and it's IN the Gutter, what a terrific shot, What kind of can)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 926 | View Replies]

To: fqued
The men can play the come line in Vegas at the craps table and still ride the ponies. Women can play the come line on the ponies and still ride in Vegas, but the odds are different.
982 posted on 05/23/2003 6:10:00 PM PDT by Cvengr (0;^))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 979 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Nah, I disagree. Focus on your 5 iron, wedge and putter first. Get the swing down, then go to the woods and drivers.

I did that 4 years ago. I haven't played a round in 6 months, played a tourney last week and carried the team with out warming up in the high 70's from my effort, several under team effort. Had one poor shot, chip shot when I looked up and hit too far under the ball. Rest of it was instinct.

I've seen too many 'long hitters' give up the game because after several years they might only play 3 times a year and then never can figure out why they're 12-20 strokes over their former self.
983 posted on 05/23/2003 6:19:11 PM PDT by Cvengr (0;^))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 970 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Just came back from a round of ... well, never mind about that.

Sorenstam did precisely what I and a lot of others thought she would do - beat a small group of guys (11, to be exact) who happened to have a particular bad two days. Some percentage of people will always hit a temporary downturn. Those men have nothing of which to be ashamed.

I think this travesty was terrible for women's golf. Kathy Whitworth was on earlier (I just finished the tape) and basically waffled on that point - which I found very interesting. The fact that Sorenstam kicked her out of the locker room before the round probably opened her eyes about some things.

I notice the guy posting the scores so glowingly in Sorenstam's favor yesterday and earlier today suddenly disappeared at the precise moment she started coming apart. What a coincidence that he suddenly had something more important to do. Fair weather fans and all that, I guess she became unimportant once she stopped appearing to prove some weak political point.

I give the woman credit. She tried. She collapsed due to lack of stamina, just as I mentioned she might yesterday. I fault her arrogance and folly in the attempt. There is no way this woman could make a living on the men's tour, now or ever, and that was pretty clear to those who know golf. Endorsements wouldn't come to someone who never made a cut. All she did was play on peoples' prejudices to create a sensation that went nowhere. I find that rude.

Sorenstam clearly was out of her league. Sad, really. She played the round of her life yesterday - but then, Eddie Gaedel walked his first time up. Sorenstam's performance suggests that, like her, the second time out he too would have struck out.

So now we wait for the next huckster's hype, playing on the war between the sexes to make a buck. Sigh.

984 posted on 05/23/2003 6:57:25 PM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
PGA West is the most savagely inhuman, punitive and unfair course satan could concieve.
985 posted on 05/23/2003 7:08:02 PM PDT by Bob J (Freerepublic.net...where it's always a happening....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 981 | View Replies]

To: husky ed
The only difference between Annika and the Rain Man, is Annika got an invite to play.

And so did a number of other "sponsor exemptions".

She did not have to qualify for squat. She did not have to prove a thing.

She surely did have to qualify, by having a certain handicap. Which is probably a lot better than yours.

Yet all the press and people with too few teeth thought she deserved to be there.

And a lot of knuckle dragging trogolodytes didn't.

Well at the end of the day, she couldn't make a living by just being a woman.

With lifetime earnings exceeding $11 million, I suspect that she has been a bit more successful than you. And maybe that's what's bugging you.

She actually had to go out and play the game.

And she did. And thousands of people who were there appreciated her game. And even more than that watched and appreciated her game on TV. Maybe, when you grow up, you will be on TV as well. Until then, crawl back into your hole.

troglodyte

986 posted on 05/23/2003 7:08:25 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 959 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Why ruin a good walk?

You've jogged my memory. Somebody's definition of a round of golf was "a good walk, ruined."

Who was it? Mark Twain?

Anyone?

987 posted on 05/23/2003 7:10:28 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 971 | View Replies]

To: jackbill
With lifetime earnings exceeding $11 million, I suspect that she has been a bit more successful than you. And maybe that's what's bugging you.

And after Swedish taxes she has exactly $47.27 left. Don't believe me? Check out her attire the last 2 days...looks like she shops at Costco.

BTW - I'm an Annika fan, just brutally honest.

988 posted on 05/23/2003 7:12:33 PM PDT by Bob J (Freerepublic.net...where it's always a happening....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 986 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Twain. And BTW , it is "A good walk spoiled."
989 posted on 05/23/2003 7:13:27 PM PDT by Bob J (Freerepublic.net...where it's always a happening....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 987 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Ahhhhhhh, thank you.

It was driving me crazy trying to think who said that.

990 posted on 05/23/2003 7:15:16 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 989 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow; marktwain
I believe it was Mr. Clemens.
991 posted on 05/23/2003 7:23:31 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 987 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
LOL - Yeah those were "putts of a lifetime" - the kind of thing that keeps making me go back out to the course week in and week out.

We played Angel's Trace North 1st Round, Belle Terre 2nd Round, and Crown Park 3rd Round. Also fit in a practice round at Whispering Pines.

992 posted on 05/23/2003 8:26:13 PM PDT by commish (Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 962 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Have a great round of golf tomorrow with your lady friends. I'm sure you'll still be playing with your balls tomorrow night -- by yourself.
993 posted on 05/23/2003 8:30:30 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 767 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
No the projected cut after 1 was +1, right off the PGATour site. Not that you would check anything being a well known BSer. The cut is 70+ ties at the end of one +1 was a huge tie for 65th.
994 posted on 05/23/2003 8:53:20 PM PDT by discostu (A cow don't make ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 894 | View Replies]

To: husky ed
She played fairly well especially when considering the vast quantity of differences between the LPGA and PGA (because she used her own clubs that was about the only thing the same), didn't choke under the pressure and showed she can handle herself. 114 people started, only one gets to win, close to 40 don't get to make it to the last rounds. How a person comports themselves even in a loss is telling, by the 6th hole of the 2nd round she was toast, but she kept plugging away trying her best. Compare that to Clearwater who got DQ'd, at least she can say she was a better sportsman than him.
995 posted on 05/23/2003 8:59:25 PM PDT by discostu (A cow don't make ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 899 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
That's all most of us wanted to do. Certain people hounded these threads for the last week spreading lies and insults. I cannot and will not let lies go unchallenged, especially when they're about me. I realize from your standpoint that's annoying and I'm sorry, I just hope you can understand my position.
996 posted on 05/23/2003 9:02:38 PM PDT by discostu (A cow don't make ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 928 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
I'm the wrong one to ask. I don't see a disparity in the prize money. Prize money is a function of both skill and audience.

See very few of us in the "pro-Annika" camp we trying to make this some sort of equalizing measure. Pretty much everything you've seen Presidio or Cedric say I think I don't. What I liked was seeing somebody try to reach beyond themselves, a proven winner who normally enters events as the favorite taking the leap into MUCH more difficult playing conditions and going in as the underdog. The gender and even the sport didn't matter one bit to me, it's the concept that I like. To me that's what sports is and hopefully always will be about, people not being comfortable with the same stuff and trying to rise above it, even if they fail, even if they fail miserably, they tried. That is so extremely cool, it's one of the most spectacular things a person can do.

Why is it sad? She did the best she could and she didn't quit, she kept trying even after the effort became futile. One of the things I always love in the Olympics isn't the winners, it's the abject losers, the cross country skier that's an hour and half behind the pace, they're so exhausted they can barely stand and sometime aren't standing, who just keep trying, not because they can win but because they won't quit. Now I'm not saying Annika went to that level, but she did to a lesser extent embody that spirit. The challenge, the effort to rise above herself, not quiting even when she'd lost. That is NEVER sad. That is the spirit of sport and competition.
997 posted on 05/23/2003 9:17:44 PM PDT by discostu (A cow don't make ham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 895 | View Replies]

To: presidio9; an amused spectator; headsonpikes; Ready4Freddy; discostu; Labyrinthos; pegleg
I have a life on weekends. On the golf course. So you won't be hearing from me after another hour or so from now.

Gee, whatever happened to your golf game? Looks like you were ready to bolt when she teed off, but when she started to falter, you stuck around.

That is so brave of you.

998 posted on 05/24/2003 2:53:19 AM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: KellyAdmirer
I notice the guy posting the scores so glowingly in Sorenstam's favor yesterday and earlier today suddenly disappeared at the precise moment she started coming apart. What a coincidence that he suddenly had something more important to do. Fair weather fans and all that, I guess she became unimportant once she stopped appearing to prove some weak political point.

I noticed that as well. I did not comment on the thread, as I do not know much about golf, but it seemed that the male feminists ran for the hills.

I also noticed that the only reason the male feminists believed people were against this publicity stunt was hatred of women. Oh well.

999 posted on 05/24/2003 3:52:45 AM PDT by Hacksaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 984 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
Maybe the sponsor should make a special exemption for Annika to play on the weekend, too.

I knew some idiot was going to (sarcastically) suggest this at some point -- the whole reason I have been in favor of Sorenstram competing here is that she is doing it by the same rules as the men. If they were to change the rules for her, then that would have been a real circus sideshow and an embarassment for the PGA.

1,000 posted on 05/24/2003 4:47:14 AM PDT by kevkrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 897 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 961-980981-1,0001,001-1,020 ... 1,041-1,044 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson