Skip to comments.
US Senate--Estrada Cloture Vote Scheduled for 12:15 p.m. (EDT) Today
US Senate ^
 | May 8, 2003
Posted on 05/08/2003 7:44:35 AM PDT by TomGuy
Floor Schedule 
Thursday, May 8, 2003 
9:30 a.m. Thursday: convene and vote on the adoption of the resolution of ratification to the NATO Expansion Treaty. 
Following the vote, resume consideration of S. 14, the Energy Bill 
12:15 p.m.: vote on the motion to invoke cloture on the Estrada nomination. If cloture is not invoked, a cloture vote on the Owen nomination will occur after which there may be a period of morning business. 
Thereafter, the Senate will begin consideration of S. 113, the FISA bill.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cloture; estrada; judicialnomination; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next  last
To: Howlin
    put me on your list, too. 
 Also, I'm tired of the current strategy. It's getting nowhere AND it's getting no attention in the media. 
 This strategy is DOA. Time for a change or for someone to lob a legislative hand grenade.
To: TomGuy
    OK, one more time with feeling!!! 
 
Any bets (Bennettesque) on the outcome. I'm guessing: same old - same old.
To: RockBassCreek
    I'll be glad to, but understand it's a list for ALL live threads of breaking news, okay??? Not just Estrada.
23
posted on 
05/08/2003 8:05:54 AM PDT
by 
Howlin
 
To: TomGuy
    Will this be on CSPAN 2? 
 Do you know what they'll do for the May 9th anniversary?
To: cynicom
    Bet you can't guess on the result of this vote? :>)
25
posted on 
05/08/2003 8:10:47 AM PDT
by 
TLBSHOW
(the gift is to see the truth)
 
To: Howlin
    I can't believe it costs a million dollars to land a plane on an aircraft carrier. A million dollars to move the Presidential Entourage from the White House to the deck? Maybe. 
 
I think it's just terrific that the dims think that W's speech was a campaign event and he should have to pay for it. Let's see... he HAD to make the end-of-hostilities announcement (somewhere). He, as the C-I-C had the prerogative to visit the troops anywhere and everywhere he (not Susan Estrogen) sees fit. He combines the two. I think he saved the government money. 
 
Now, to speak to the topic, I know that W has a plan for these nominations, that he hasn't forgotten about them. I suspect, based on the Hatch leak yesterday, that the dims have been warned, they have one more chance today, but the battleship is already moving into position and if they don't vote for cloture today, the big artillery starts firing tomorrow. At least I hope so. But I trust the pres so I'm patient.
26
posted on 
05/08/2003 8:11:19 AM PDT
by 
johnb838
(Understand the root causes of American Anger)
 
To: TomGuy; 1tin_soldier; a-whole-nother-box-of-pandoras; Ahban; Arkansawyer; Arkinsaw; Asphodel; ...
    Pinged to all in Arkansas. We should have kept Hutchinson, but right now we need to get rid of Blanche Lincoln who so far has voted against Estrada everytime.
To: Howlin
    Thanks for the ping. I still think it's all fascinating, I'm gonna do a few chores, run and be back in time to watch.
28
posted on 
05/08/2003 8:13:52 AM PDT
by 
fml
 
To: TomGuy
    So far, the Republican Senate strategy appears to be simply to annoy the Democrats enough to convince them to give up. The electorate could care less about "getting it on the record." The record won't mean a thing next November. The Democrats may be playing with fire, but so far they haven't been so much as singed.
To: Bahbah; All
    Why not blanket Frist, Talent, et al to take up the plan at hand.
30
posted on 
05/08/2003 8:17:10 AM PDT
by 
Havoc
(If you can't be frank all the time are you lying the rest of the time?)
 
To: johnb838
    I would not ever play poker with Dubya. I would advise Bill Bennett not to play poker with Dubya. I hope Dashole decides to play poker with Dubya, he will lose South Dakota.
To: TomGuy
    I'll believe that the Senate majority is serious about judicial confirmations when they force the RATs to hold an honest-to-god continuous all night long filibuster.
To: TomGuy
    Here's the actual record
 http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=108&session=1&vote=00140
 http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=108&session=1&vote=00114
 http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=108&session=1&vote=00056
 http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=108&session=1&vote=00053
 http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=108&session=1&vote=00040
33
posted on 
05/08/2003 8:24:10 AM PDT
by 
pulaskibush
(Tell everyone you can find about this over and over again!)
 
To: familyofman
    New Lotto: 
 
How many nominees will the Dims be filibustering simultaneously by the end of 2003? 2004? 
 
I'd say, at least 4, probably 6 [because they can]--if the Pubs don't "grow some" soon.
34
posted on 
05/08/2003 8:25:45 AM PDT
by 
TomGuy
 
To: Howlin
    Thanks for the ping! I've been off of caffeine for about three weeks. May have to start a caffeine intravenous drip this afternoon.
35
posted on 
05/08/2003 8:26:08 AM PDT
by 
NautiNurse
(If Lawton Chiles runs for the Senate seat in 2004, we will **really** have Jurassic Park in Florida)
 
To: pulaskibush
36
posted on 
05/08/2003 8:27:00 AM PDT
by 
TomGuy
 
To: johnb838
    If clinton had to pay for every PR stunt he pulled he would have to borrow more money from CommieChina.
37
posted on 
05/08/2003 8:27:24 AM PDT
by 
pulaskibush
(Landing on a carrier beats adjusting rocks on Normandy that were planted by liberal operatives)
 
To: Howlin
    Is it limited to judicial confirmation issues?
To: RockBassCreek
    Nope; I use it for most government breaking news day to day.
39
posted on 
05/08/2003 8:31:37 AM PDT
by 
Howlin
 
To: Eric in the Ozarks
    I'm afraid the Pubbies (I vote for them, don'tcha know) haven't the guts to deal forcefully with the obstructionist UNCONSTITUTIONAL democrats.
40
posted on 
05/08/2003 8:35:07 AM PDT
by 
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson