Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TV watchdog checks claims of bias on Murdoch channel [Fox News]
The Guardian ^ | May 8, 2003 | Matt Wells

Posted on 05/08/2003 3:33:18 AM PDT by ejdrapes

TV watchdog checks claims of bias on Murdoch channel

The Murdoch-owned Fox News Channel, whose determinedly patriotic stance during the Iraq conflict brought it critical notoriety but commercial success, is under investigation by television regulators in Britain for alleged bias.

The independent television commission is investigating nine complaints by viewers of the channel, broadcast on Sky Digital satellite, also controlled by Rupert Murdoch.

If the network is found to have breached the ITC's "due impartiality" rules, it could be forced out.

In 1999 the ITC revoked the licence of Med TV, a channel aimed at the Kurdish diaspora, for failing to conform to the impartiality rules.

Julian Petley, chairman of the Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom, called on the ITC to act against Fox News: "I'm not in favour of censorship, but Murdoch would like to do with British television news what he has done with newspapers, which is to force people to compete on his own terms.

"So if we allow into Britain the kind of journalism represented by Fox, that would bring about a form of censorship ."

ITC tackles Fox News bias claims


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: bbc; bigtimeclymers; britishfriends; brownshirts; ccrm; censor; censorship; clymers; foxnews; freespeech; iraqaftermath; lamestreammedia; lovedclintonswars; mediabias; presstitutes; prodictators; theguardian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: ejdrapes
Bump
41 posted on 05/08/2003 2:32:49 PM PDT by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
The worldwide Left have their knickers in a wad over Fox, probably because Fox has destroyed the steely grip the Leftists had on broadcast news. No surprise that they're resorting to censorship to try to silence Fox.
42 posted on 05/08/2003 2:54:24 PM PDT by Major Matt Mason (np Richard Thompson, "The Old Kit Bag")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; lonevoice; bamabaseballmom; FoxGirl; Mr. Bob; ...
FoxFan ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent FoxFan list.

43 posted on 05/08/2003 5:01:33 PM PDT by nutmeg (USA: Land of the Free - Thanks to the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
The Murdoch-owned Fox News Channel, whose determinedly pro-US stance during the Iraq conflict brought it critical notoriety but commercial success, is being investigated by television regulators in Britain for alleged bias.

This is laughable. These people are so threatened by the fact the leftist anti-American creeps no longer have a monopoly in the media.

44 posted on 05/08/2003 5:47:32 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
Thanks for the heads up!
45 posted on 05/08/2003 7:18:11 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Aaargh! Weapon of ass destruction!
46 posted on 05/08/2003 7:30:59 PM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Becki
The independent television commission is investigating nine complaints by viewers of the channel..
1. CNN
2. BBC
3. ABC
4. CBS
5. NBC
6. Al Jazeera
7. La Monde
8. Peter Jennings
9. Dan Rather

Becki, You nailed it.

They are threatening to censor FOX over nine complaints?
They either have an anti-FOX agenda or way too much time on their hands.

47 posted on 05/08/2003 7:46:08 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Becki
Perfect, Becki LOL
48 posted on 05/08/2003 9:16:14 PM PDT by Tamzee (I wondered why somebody didn't do something. Then I realized... I am somebody! - Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
Well, here's a bit of info... take note of the last line, he's planning a book about the "myth" of the "Loony Left". My goodness, think he could be a liberal????? ;-)

Looks like he is just another one of those intellectual hypocrits who passionately defends the Freedom of Speech... except when people state information that liberals don't want to get out to the public.



Julian Petley
E-mail: Julian.Petley@brunel.ac.uk







Julian Petley lectures in Sociology and Communication in the Department of Human Sciences. His current research interests include media policy and regulation (with a particular emphasis on censorship in its various forms), the British cinema, the British press, and media influence.

Recent books include Ill Effects (co-edited with Martin Barker), Routledge 1997 (substantially revised new edition to be published in October 2000); and Forbidden British Cinema (Vol.3 of The Journal of Popular British Cinema, co-edited with Ian Conrich), Flicks Books, 2000.

Some recent published articles are: 'The cinema and the state, or why Horny Catbabe matters', in the Forbidden British Cinema volume; 'The regulation of media content', in The Media in Britain, Jane Stokes and Anna Reading (eds), Macmillan 1999; 'The pilgrim's regress: the politics of the Boultings' films', in The Films of the Boulting Brothers, Alan Burton and Tim O'Sullivan (eds), Flicks Books 2000; 'Art Cinema', in The Cinema Book (second edition), Pam Cook and Mieke Bernink (eds), British Film Institute 1999; 'Faces for Spaces', in The Journalism Reader, Michael Bromley and Tom O'Malley (eds), Routledge 1997.

Julian Petley is also chair of the Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom and a member of the editorial boards of the British Journalism Review and the independent media magazine Vertigo.

Future plans include a book on the myth of the 'Loony Left', a study of the film director Michael Reeves, and a history of the 'other' British cinema.

http://www.brunel.ac.uk/depts/hs/cmcr/Staff1JP.htm


49 posted on 05/08/2003 9:22:14 PM PDT by Tamzee (I wondered why somebody didn't do something. Then I realized... I am somebody! - Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
I could scream! This is going to be one heck of a nasty campaign year from the lefties of the world.
50 posted on 05/08/2003 9:23:26 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
And, surprise! Julian Petley is a "peace activist" who was against the war in Iraq...

http://www.iol.ie/~mazzoldi/toolsforchange/call/signatories.html
51 posted on 05/08/2003 9:39:16 PM PDT by Tamzee (I wondered why somebody didn't do something. Then I realized... I am somebody! - Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
Fox ping!
52 posted on 05/08/2003 11:31:18 PM PDT by lainde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: feinswinesuksass; HangFire; nunya bidness; dighton
"So if we allow into Britain the kind of journalism represented by Fox, that would bring about a form of censorship ."
 
It's not actually possible that someone said this, is it? My head hurts.

53 posted on 05/10/2003 9:21:12 AM PDT by AnnaZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
I was in England right before they got satellite TV. The BBC was says that it was the end of the world. Cat living with dogs, hell on Earth was here.
54 posted on 05/10/2003 9:26:49 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Semper Gumby - Always flexible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ
"Dear Dr. Petley, someone claiming to be you is spouting nonsense."
55 posted on 05/10/2003 9:46:21 AM PDT by dighton (Amen-Corner Hatchet Team, Nasty Little Clique, Vulgar Horde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
I believe that's called Censorship. What a surprise.
56 posted on 05/10/2003 9:58:10 AM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HangFire
Re-ping.
 
xo

57 posted on 05/12/2003 2:25:00 PM PDT by AnnaZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
bttt
58 posted on 05/13/2003 2:24:06 PM PDT by nutmeg (USA: Land of the Free - Thanks to the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson