Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cop takes 'midnight photos' of teacher's classroom
Times Argus ^ | David Delcore

Posted on 05/06/2003 9:35:22 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun

BARRE – John Mott and Tom Treece have at least one thing in common. Make that two.

Both men think they have been unfairly accused and, if you believe their critics, both have had a chilling impact on students at Spaulding High School.

Mott is the Barre Town police officer who admits he spent part of an early morning break last month photographing student projects in the classroom of a controversial history teacher.

Treece is that teacher. A passionate pacifist, he has been skewered publicly by critics who say he is pedaling his personal political views to the students in his class. Part of the proof, critics say, is in the photographs Mott took when he visited the high school April 9 while on duty, in uniform, and out of his jurisdiction.

The photographs were taken at around 1:30 a.m. after Mott, who once worked at Spaulding, persuaded a custodian to unlock the door to the classroom Treece shares with another teacher.

Mott isn’t apologizing for his actions and says he has at least temporarily refused orders from Barre Town Police Chief Michael Stevens and Town Manager Carl Rogers to supply school officials with copies of the photographs.

“I’m going to speak to an attorney first,” he said.

Mott disputes an account of the April 9 incident contained in a letter written by school Superintendent Dorothy Anderson to the police chief.

Specifically, Mott disputes Anderson’s claim that he “banged on the front door” of the high school to get the attention of night custodian Arnold Cliche, and that Cliche opened the door and let him in.

“It didn’t happen that way,” he said.

According to Mott, he entered the school through an unlocked maintenance door, found Cliche and asked him to unlock the door to Treece’s classroom room so he could take photographs with his personal camera. Although he was on duty at the time, Mott maintains that he was on a break and wanted to photograph student projects that offended him as an American and a retired military man.

“I wanted everybody else to see what was in that room. You can’t explain it,” he said.

Among the student projects that Mott said he photographed were a poster of the President Bush with duct tape over his mouth and a large papier-mâché combat boot with the American flag stuffed inside stepping on a doll. He said there also were pictures of Cuban dictator Fidel Castro and his former chief lieutenant, Ernesto “Che” Guevara, posted on the walls.

“Having spent 30 years in uniform, I was insulted,” he said. “… I’m just taking a stand on what happens in that classroom as a resident and a voter and a taxpayer of this community.”

Mott said he took the photographs less than 48 hours after attending a school board meeting at which several residents complained about what they claimed was an attempt to “indoctrinate” not “educate” students.

School officials have rejected that notion, defending Treece as a “thought-provoking” teacher who provides students in his public issues class with resources from the full spectrum of political perspectives.

“As a teacher he (Treece) does present all sides of an issue,” Anderson said.

Anderson said she was concerned that Mott used his uniform to gain access to a locked classroom after hours without supervision.

“I find this behavior, at the very least, in violation of our policy for visitors at the school,” she wrote in her letter to the police chief. “I also find it disturbing that a police officer would wear his uniform under such circumstances thereby intimidating our employee (Cliche) into letting him in the building at a very unusual hour.”

Anderson said she met with the police chief and the town manager on Friday to discuss her concerns and to reiterate her request for copies of the photographs Mott took and has been circulating in the community. She said Mott had not yet complied with that request, which is based solely on her desire to confirm the photographs were not doctored in any way.

“We’re not embarrassed about what was in that classroom,” she said. “We just want to make sure that the pictures he (Mott) took are an accurate reflection of what the classroom looked like.”

Mott said the photographs he took are authentic and accused school officials of “tap-dancing” around an issue that was brought to their attention last month by using the circumstances under which he entered Treece’s classroom as a diversion.

“It leads me to believe they are out witch-hunting,” he said.

Treece said he knows the feeling. He says Mott and his other detractors don’t have a clue about what he does in his classroom, but that hasn’t stopped them from jumping to conclusions based on his personal political views.

“None of these parents know me in any way,” he said. “They just think they know me. Everything they know about me is hearsay. They don’t have kids in my class. They have taken lies and innuendoes and run with them.”

Treece does not hide his personal views and acknowledges his public criticisms of the war in Iraq and President Bush have irked many in the community. However, he said their contention that he is force-feeding his views to Spaulding students is simply wrong.

“I tell kids from day one: ‘I don’t want you to agree with me, I want you to be informed and think for yourselves,” he said. “I have never squashed dissent in my class in any way shape or form.”

Treece said his message to students is simple: “Defend what you believe and if you can’t defend it I’m going to pick holes in your argument no matter what side of the issue you’re on.”

Treece said he supplies his students with a broad range of resources and encourages them to use them to come to their own conclusions.

“My goal in that class is to get kids to think and be critical of everything they read and hear and see,” he said.

Treece said he’s tired of being painted as anti-American simply because he challenges students not to take what anyone – not the president, their parents, or even he – says at face value.

“I want them to understand that everybody’s got an agenda … everybody,” he said.

Treece said that goes for his detractors, some of whom are using the controversy over a six-word sentence – “All hail the idiot boy king” – that he posted on a bulletin board next to a picture of President Bush as a reason to reject the high school budget. The budget is scheduled for a re-vote next week.

“They’re out to get the budget and they’ve made me their whipping boy,” he said.

Treece makes no apologies for how he conducts his classes or for his own political views. In retrospect, he said, the comment he posted about Bush was probably too direct.

The board meets at 7 p.m. in the high school library. Like the Malones, both Mott and Treece said they plan to attend.

“I did not recognize how fragile people’s feelings were at the time,” he said. “It was horrible timing on my part.”

If he had it to do over again, Treece said he would spell out the same sentiments in two pages of text that wouldn’t have offended anyone.

Paul and Norma Malone, the local couple who first took issue with the comment Treece posted on the board, insist they’re not out to scuttle the budget, but want to restore balance in the curriculum at Spaulding.

“Our position has been and still is there should be a balance in that curriculum and respect in that school,” said Paul Malone.

Although the couple’s criticism is not limited to Treece, they admit his comment served as a springboard for their effort.

“It’s not an issue of freedom of speech. That was never the issue,” he said. “It’s an issue of balance and it’s an issue of professionalism.”

Based on discussions with faculty, parents and students, Norma Malone said students from a largely conservative community are being urged to view the world to through a liberal lens.

“There’s nothing from the center or from the right,” she said, rejecting Treece’s comments to the contrary.

The Malones, who have formed the group “Citizens Advocating Responsible Education,” say they plan to attend tonight’s school board meeting and present a copy of a petition signed by several hundred supporters. The petition states in part: “Students must be provided a thorough, factual, unbiased study of the history of our nation, the importance of our government institutions, and the significance of our political traditions so as to engender civic duty and respect for our national values.”

In order to accomplish that goal, the petition suggests revisions to the school’s policy regarding academic freedom and the appointment of community members to the school board’s curriculum committee.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Vermont
KEYWORDS: antiamerican; antibush; blameamericafirst; bushbashing; commies; communists; hateamericafirst; leftwinghategroup; litteredschoolhouse; looneyleft; police; procastro; prodictator; publicschool; redmenace; students; taxdollarsatwork; theredmenace; vermont; youpayforthis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 441-456 next last
To: zeugma
"Had I been the janitor, I'd have noted the cop's badge number and department to give to the principle/superintendent in the morning and then told the cop to specify why he wanted admittance, and if not satisfied, tell him to get a warrant and pound sand until it shows."

Bingo! In fact, I'll bet that the janitor has instructions _not_ to admit anyone into the school after hours.
221 posted on 05/06/2003 11:16:18 AM PDT by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
I can't believe schools like that exist any more. Where are they? It certainly has not been my experience in any California public school, or university.
222 posted on 05/06/2003 11:16:27 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: George from New England
If he went into the office during the day the excess administrators would have been called on the phone; they would have gone down while he was being stalled in the office; they would have emptied the walls of everything; there would have been nothing to see.

In retrospect, he should have done that very thing....the morning after
his night of picture taking. Then release the pictures when the administration
denies there was ever anything in there.

223 posted on 05/06/2003 11:16:27 AM PDT by gcruse (Piety is only skin deep, but hypocrisy goes clear to the soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; MineralMan
Even more reasons to home school, fortuneately my children graduated before all this PC BS started. Useing a few bad incidents to create panic and then to make knee-jerk bad laws is how we loose are freedoms, if we just lay down and take it that is.
224 posted on 05/06/2003 11:17:39 AM PDT by fella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
"Under what authority do you support your claim that a uniformed police officer is committing the crime of trespass when he goes onto the premises of a publicly owned building?
Mott was outside his jurisdiction. He had no official business inside the building. He improperly used his uniform to gain access to the classroom in order to perform a personal errand.

You doubtless understand also that "publicly-owned" is not synonymous with "I can go inside anytime I have a hankering to do so."

Case closed."

Again, if you have any authority to support your opinion, please show it to me.

Please refer to the first paragraph above if you forgot the question I asked you. Thanks.

Trace
225 posted on 05/06/2003 11:17:53 AM PDT by Trace21230 (Ideal MOAB test site: Paris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Thank you, you get it.
226 posted on 05/06/2003 11:17:53 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Funny how the liberals and media had no such outrage regarding the methods used to obtain the Pentagon papers, Linda Tripp's records, or Bill Bennett's gambling info.
227 posted on 05/06/2003 11:18:41 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trace21230
If the drawer is not locked, the teacher has no reasonable expectation of privacy for the documents, and they are not subject to 4th amendment protection.

The drawer may not have been locked, but the room was. That should cloud things up a little. Personally, I don't leave anything at work that I wouldn't want handed to my boss or police. I pretty much figure my employer has the right to anything there. This issue gets more dicey when it is a public instution involved, but since I'd never work for a public institution, I haven't devled into the details of the matter.

228 posted on 05/06/2003 11:18:42 AM PDT by zeugma (Hate pop-up ads? Here's the fix: http://www.mozilla.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
So, he did nothing wrong ^-^
229 posted on 05/06/2003 11:18:46 AM PDT by Calpernia (www.HelpFeedaChild.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Yeah, I don't know why he didn't just tell some of the parents about what he'd heard was going on.

It sounds to me like such was being said, but the teacher and school administration were trying to claim it wasn't.

230 posted on 05/06/2003 11:18:54 AM PDT by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
223: You are SO right! Clever! Clever!
231 posted on 05/06/2003 11:19:08 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Yeah, I don't know why he didn't just tell some of the parents about what he'd heard was going on.

It sounds to me like such was being said, but the teacher and school administration were trying to claim it wasn't actually going on.

232 posted on 05/06/2003 11:19:14 AM PDT by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
You are taking this "outside his jurisdiction" thing way too seriously. It's not that big of a deal. Leaving his jurisdiction on break is not wrong. Often you will find city cops and sheriff's deputies assisting each other along with state troopers on a call. Have a fit about it - see where it gets you.
233 posted on 05/06/2003 11:19:17 AM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: YoungKentuckyConservative

May I remind you to e-mail the school

migilshs@u61.net;magilshs@u61.net;scalcshs@u61.net;
wigrshs@u61.net;mritcshs@u61.net;gdesmshs@helicon.net;
mhadlshs@u61.net;jhatcshs@u61.net;jgoddshs@u61.net;
mjarvshs@u61.net;mlafrshs@u61.net;jlewishs@u61.net;
drapashs@u61.net;csmitshs@u61.net;mstuart42@hotmail.com;
ttreeshs@u61.net;kbearshs@u61.net;kbearshs@u61.net;jbiology@aol.com


234 posted on 05/06/2003 11:19:23 AM PDT by YoungKentuckyConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Our high school has several known communists teaching history. They do not teach the Constitution is an ideal. They do not teach the kids how to think, only to regurgitate offensive remarks about America. The class spends _weeks_ discussing lynching and the japanese internment. The kids are not taught about the American Revolution at all-- they skip it.
235 posted on 05/06/2003 11:19:39 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: dead
The cop stepped over the line here. If he wasn't on official business, he has no more of a right to be in that building at 1:30 in the morning than anybody else.

And the teacher's a jerk, and the custodian is a walking cliche.

My thoughts exactly - I find the cop's actions to be much worse than a teacher who can't keep their politics out of the classroom. He should be prosecuted, the teacher and janitor perhaps fired.

236 posted on 05/06/2003 11:20:07 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fml
That bring us back to trespassing - he was let in by the person in charge at the time.

Mott claims he just walked into the building -- which is trespassing.

The school claims that Mott banged on the door and the janitor let him in because of the uniform -- which is an improper use of the uniform by Mott.

The truth may be in the middle -- which means that both sides are lying. Which still says that Mott was trespassing.

237 posted on 05/06/2003 11:20:34 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
"I can't believe schools like that exist any more. Where are they? It certainly has not been my experience in any California public school, or university."

They do, and in California, too. Our local school system is outstanding, and that's because the community supports the schools, both by taking interest in the actions of the local school boards and by, in many cases, directly volunteering to help in the schools.

It wasn't always this way. But after a couple of school board recalls and constant attendance at school board meetings, the word is out that the community cares about its schools.

I volunteer to teach about my area of expertise, and do that several times a year as a guest of the school. We had trouble with the budget for the music programs, too, so local musicians stepped in and filled in to keep the programs going, donating time, instruments, and more.

Maybe you just live somewhere where nobody cares about the schools enough to do something about them. I'm sorry to hear that, but it all starts with your first school board meeting.
238 posted on 05/06/2003 11:20:36 AM PDT by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
no case open, public schools are public. The school property often doubles as a park. The fact that he was let and no one disputes he clearly said he was on a break, negates the fact that he was permitted on the building. In fact if he tried, as a parent especially, to do this when students were there then he would not have been allowed because of disruption. You may feel unconfortable but his presence and enter were legally sound.
239 posted on 05/06/2003 11:20:50 AM PDT by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: fella
In most public schools to gain entrance to a classroom one must go to the office to get permission and sign in. It is doubtful that the officer would have been allowed to go to the classroom during the day.

Teachers know that the materials that are displayed in the classroom are part of the subliminal instruction of the children. In every school where I have taught my administrators have always made note of the materials that I had displayed on the walls, whether it was childrens' work or instructional posters.

After hearing what was on the wall of Treece's classroom I believe that he is teaching the students to be adversaries of our government and not to be good citizens. Pictures speak louder than words.

If there is any hope for the children of our nation teachers such as this should be fired and school boards who allow such teachers should also be fired and finally, a superintendant who behaves in such a way to try to blame the cop instead of the teacher should also be fired.

240 posted on 05/06/2003 11:21:29 AM PDT by Lauratealeaf (Iraqis say, Good, Very Good, Bush Good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 441-456 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson