This reminded me of a Harry Turtledove alternative- history story I read. The Germans have captured India and Gandhi is continuing with his civil disobedience tactics, thinking that since he is still dealing with Europeans, the Germans will back down the same as the British did.
Oops! Too late he discovers the Nazis are a totally different breed of cat. Gandhi tries to escape after the Germans machine gun demonstrating crowds, but he's turned in by a Indian traitor and the Nazis execute him without a second thought. The End.
To: GATOR NAVY
Beat me to it. Yeah. If India had been conquered by the Nazi's or the Japanese, Ghandi would have been just another body in the camps.
2 posted on
04/28/2003 7:40:25 PM PDT by
Kozak
To: GATOR NAVY
The Gandhi-as-Peacemaker myth has been shattered to pieces.
-Regards, T.
3 posted on
04/28/2003 7:49:00 PM PDT by
T Lady
(.Freed From the Dimocratic Shackles since 1992)
To: GATOR NAVY
Excellent find.....I'll be sending it to a liberal who idolizes Gandhi!
4 posted on
04/28/2003 7:50:22 PM PDT by
JulieRNR21
(Take W-04........Across America!)
To: Allan
ping
5 posted on
04/28/2003 8:04:27 PM PDT by
keri
To: GATOR NAVY
The analogy, it should go without saying, overlooks major differences between the two cases. Whereas the 20th-century British were far too benign an imperial power to choose to slaughter peaceful resisters to their rule, theres no evidence that Saddam Hussein, already responsible for the massacre and torture of hundreds of thousands of his countrymen (to say nothing of the many more who died in his aggressive wars against Iran and Kuwait) would likewise have succumbed to friendly persuasion Jacques Chirac to the contrary notwithstanding. (Its not that we didnt try!) The 400+ killed a Armistar in 1919 would disagree. The British in this case, to gain revenge for the deaths of four of their countrymen 2 days earlier. trapped between 15,000 and 20,000 in an essentially enclosed area, and opened fire. These were not the people responsible for the earlier murders, by the way. These people were involved in a peaceful protest.
Are the British equal to Saddam? Not even close. Was their rule always benign? Not even close.
To: GATOR NAVY
I've always suspected that Gandhi was one of the most overrated people in history.
I've also wondered how long he would have lasted if he had been, say, a Tibetan in 1951, trying his "passive resistance" idea against the Chinese Communists.
To: GATOR NAVY
Also I find Einstein and interesting "pacifist". Sure was able to come up with a rational for use of force when his ox was getting gored.
8 posted on
04/28/2003 8:13:49 PM PDT by
Kozak
To: GATOR NAVY
Whatever the occasional failings of the British In their colonies, one could hardly have asked for a better opponent. Gandhi had the unbelievable good fortune to be a revolutionary fighting against the most civilized, benevolent and lawful empire in the history of mankind. His experience is worthless as a guide to any other situation.
To: Welsh Rabbit
ping for later
To: GATOR NAVY
The one aggrieved group in the world today who would do well to imitate Gandhi are the Palestinians. Although some Israelis have become brutal, vicious and insensitive toward anyone except fellow Jews, the American Jewish community who back them, and, I think, a majority of Israelis would readily grant a Palestianian state, and possibly even cede some of East Jerusalem if instead of their mad tactics of turing their young people into guidance systems for bombs (which only alienate possible supporters in the West by dehumanizing the Palestinians through their own actions), they adopted Gandhi's tactics.
It would be hard for the Palestinians, but martyrs deaths which imitate the Jewish martyrs at Massada or in the days of the Maccabees and are recognizably martyr's deaths to Jews and Christians, rather than the twisted "martyrdom" of Qutb's existentialist reimaging if Islam would win the day. Following Qutb's notion of martyrdom will only lead to decades more of death on both sides and no Palestinian state.
To: GATOR NAVY
Another illusion bites the dust. So much for revisonist history from the movies.
17 posted on
04/28/2003 11:13:47 PM PDT by
lainde
To: GATOR NAVY
Gandhi's example is useful only in limited circumstances. I've heard contradictory things about whether or not Gandhi supported war in dire situations. Gandhi's leadership of India to independence through peaceful protest is praiseworthy. However, it's unfortunate that people today apply his example beyond its application. It unfortunately leads to unwarranted criticism of Gandhi.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson