Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

American Power Moves Beyond the Mere Super
New York Times ^ | April 27, 2003 | GREGG EASTERBROOK

Posted on 04/26/2003 5:22:02 PM PDT by Brandon

The New York TimesSponsored by Starbucks

April 27, 2003

American Power Moves Beyond the Mere Super

By GREGG EASTERBROOK

Stealth drones, G.P.S.-guided smart munitions that hit precisely where aimed; antitank bombs that guide themselves; space-relayed data links that allow individual squad leaders to know exactly where American and opposition forces are during battle ó the United States military rolled out all this advanced technology, and more, in its lightning conquest of Iraq. No other military is even close to the United States. The American military is now the strongest the world has ever known, both in absolute terms and relative to other nations; stronger than the Wehrmacht in 1940, stronger than the legions at the height of Roman power. For years to come, no other nation is likely even to try to rival American might.

Which means: the global arms race is over, with the United States the undisputed heavyweight champion. Other nations are not even trying to match American armed force, because they are so far behind they have no chance of catching up. The great-powers arms race, in progress for centuries, has ended with the rest of the world conceding triumph to the United States. 

Now only a nuclear state, like, perhaps, North Korea, has any military leverage against the winner.

Paradoxically, the runaway American victory in the conventional arms race might inspire a new round of proliferation of atomic weapons. With no hope of matching the United States plane for plane, more countries may seek atomic weapons to gain deterrence. 

North Korea might have been moved last week to declare that it has an atomic bomb by the knowledge that it has no hope of resisting American conventional power. If it becomes generally believed that possession of even a few nuclear munitions is enough to render North Korea immune from American military force, other nations ó Iran is an obvious next candidate ó may place renewed emphasis on building them. 

For the extent of American military superiority has become almost impossible to overstate. The United States sent five of its nine supercarrier battle groups to the region for the Iraq assault. A tenth Nimitz-class supercarrier is under construction. No other nation possesses so much as one supercarrier, let alone nine battle groups ringed by cruisers and guarded by nuclear submarines. 

Russia has one modern aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, but it has about half the tonnage of an American supercarrier, and has such a poor record that it rarely leaves port. The former Soviet navy did preliminary work on a supercarrier, but abandoned the project in 1992. Britain and France have a few small aircraft carriers. China decided against building one last year.

Any attempt to build a fleet that threatens the Pentagon's would be pointless, after all, because if another nation fielded a threatening vessel, American attack submarines would simply sink it in the first five minutes of any conflict. (The new Seawolf-class nuclear-powered submarine is essentially the futuristic supersub of "The Hunt for Red October" made real.) Knowing this, all other nations have conceded the seas to the United States, a reason American forces can sail anywhere without interference. The naval arms race ó a principal aspect of great-power politics for centuries ó is over.

United States air power is undisputed as well, with more advanced fighters and bombers than those of all other nations combined. The United States possesses three stealth aircraft (the B-1 and B-2 bombers and the F-117 fighter) with two more (the F-22 and F-35 fighters) developed and awaiting production funds. No other nation even has a stealth aircraft on the drawing board. A few nations have small numbers of heavy bombers; the United States has entire wings of heavy bombers.

No other nation maintains an aerial tanker fleet similar to that of the United States; owing to tankers, American bombers can operate anywhere in the world. No other nation has anything like the American AWACS plane, which provides exceptionally detailed radar images of the sky above battles, or the newer JSTARS plane, which provides exceptionally detailed radar images of the ground.

No other nation has air-to-air missiles or air-to-ground smart munitions of the accuracy, or numbers, of the United States. This month, for example, in the second attempt to kill Saddam Hussein, just 12 minutes passed between when a B-1 received the target coordinates and when the bomber released four smart bombs aimed to land just 50 feet and a few seconds apart. All four hit where they were supposed to.

American aerial might is so great that adversaries don't even try to fly. Serbia kept its planes on the ground during the Kosovo conflict of 1999; in recent fighting in Iraq, not a single Iraqi fighter rose to oppose United States aircraft. The governments of the world now know that if they try to launch a fighter against American air power, their planes will be blown to smithereens before they finish retracting their landing gear. The aerial arms race, a central facet of the last 50 years, is over.

The American lead in ground forces is not uncontested ó China has a large standing army ó but is large enough that the ground arms race might end, too. The United States now possesses about 9,000 M1 Abrams tanks, by far the world's strongest armored force. The Abrams cannon and fire-control system is so extraordinarily accurate that in combat gunners rarely require more than one shot to destroy an enemy tank. No other nation is currently building or planning a comparable tank force. Other governments know this would be pointless, since even if they had advanced tanks, the United States would destroy them from the air.

The American lead in electronics is also huge. Much of the "designating" of targets in the recent Iraq assault was done by advanced electronics on drones like the Global Hawk, which flies at 60,000 feet, far beyond the range of antiaircraft weapons. So sophisticated are the sensors and data links that make Global Hawk work that it might take a decade for another nation to field a similar drone ó and by then, the United States is likely to have leapfrogged ahead to something better.

As The New York Times Magazine reported last Sunday, the United States is working on unmanned, remote-piloted drone fighter planes that will be both relatively low-cost and extremely hard to shoot down, and small drone attack helicopters that will precede troops into battle. No other nation is even close to the electronics and data-management technology of these prospective weapons. The Pentagon will have a monopoly on advanced combat drones for years. 

An electronics arms race may continue in some fashion because electronics are cheaper than ships or planes. But the United States holds such an imposing lead that it is unlikely to be lapped for a long time.

Further, the United States holds an overwhelming lead in military use of space. Not only does the Pentagon command more and better reconnaissance satellites than all the rest of the world combined, American forces have begun using space-relayed data in a significant way. Space "assets" will eventually be understood to have been critical to the lightning conquest of Iraq, and the American lead in this will only grow, since the Air Force now has the second-largest space budget in the world, after NASA's.

This huge military lead is partly because of money. Last year American military spending exceeded that of all other NATO states, Russia, China, Japan, Iraq and North Korea combined, according to the Center for Defense Information, a nonpartisan research group that studies global security. This is another area where all other nations must concede to the United States, for no other government can afford to try to catch up.

The runaway advantage has been called by some excessive, yet it yields a positive benefit. Annual global military spending, stated in current dollars, peaked in 1985, at $1.3 trillion, and has been declining since, to $840 billion in 2002. That's a drop of almost half a trillion dollars in the amount the world spent each year on arms. Other nations accept that the arms race is over.

The United States military reinforces its pre-eminence by going into combat. Rightly or wrongly, the United States fights often; each fight becomes a learning opportunity for troops and a test of technology. No other military currently has the real-world experience of the United States.

There is also the high quality ó in education and motivation ó of its personnel. This lead has grown as the United States has integrated women into most combat roles, doubling the talent base on which recruiters can draw. 

The American edge does not render its forces invincible: the expensive Apache attack helicopter, for example, fared poorly against routine small-arms fire in Iraq. More important, overwhelming power hardly insures that the United States will get its way in world affairs. Force is just one aspect of international relations, while experience has shown that military power can solve only military problems, not political ones. 

North Korea now stares into the barrel of the strongest military ever assembled, and yet may be able to defy the United States, owing to nuclear deterrence. As the global arms race ends with the United States so far ahead no other nation even tries to be America's rival, the result may be a world in which Washington has historically unparalleled power, but often cannot use it. 

Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy | Search | Corrections | Help | Back to Top


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraqifreedom; newnwo; superpower
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: Brandon
Bump...
61 posted on 04/26/2003 8:40:45 PM PDT by redhead (Les Français sont des singes de capitulation qui mangent du fromage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fourdeuce82d; judgeandjury; American Soldier
Neither military, paramilitary, nor law enforcement regimes are necessary to solve our border problems. These would be solved in a few months without any additional commitment of resources if employers--especially in agriculture and in a number of key border cities--would stop hiring illegal aliens, and if laws were changed to stop regarding illegals as effectively citizens.

They're coming here for jobs, welfare benefits, and medical care. The will stop coming when it becomes clear that the well is dry.

62 posted on 04/26/2003 8:41:54 PM PDT by FredZarguna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Brandon
My wife was watching all this war wizard stuff on TV and she pointed out something that needs adding. Due to the imbedded reporters we saw first hand ... the standard by which our troops need be judged has gone outa site. These people are our best and brightest. It gives great pride to see these professional intelligent soldiers the US has to draw from to defend our country. I am proud to be represented by these people beyond measure.

Our most feared weapon, the men and women who serve.

snooker
63 posted on 04/26/2003 8:47:29 PM PDT by snooker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandon
This article is mistaken.

NATO, France, Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom, and Japan all have AWACS aircraft. We sold the aircraft to them.

Many other nations also have air refueling capability. We have been selling surplus KC-135 tankers to lots of countries.
64 posted on 04/26/2003 8:55:33 PM PDT by Chewbacca (My life is a Dilbert cartoon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnb838
I do...I see it clearly.
65 posted on 04/26/2003 8:56:10 PM PDT by Maelstrom (To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Yoda
U know, I agee. It is well past time to secure our borders! Yet first things first! We as a country had no choice but to go and kick ass and take names later......as we will!

Bush is headed in the right direction and I am super sick of listening to Bush bashers over the Patriot Acts! God Give the man some damn time please! Hell, I don't have to worry about going to jail for something I have never done, and dare the fool to try and accuse me! I am sick of those that say Homeland secruity is such an enroachment on my freedoms! By God and I am not responsible for my own damn actions? If not, who is? Screw the lawyers!

I am sick of this crap! I do not have the knowledge of the President of the US and I would be the biggest fool on earth to think I did! Especially now of all times! I have not forgotten 9-11! I want blood and vegance and these criminals brought to justice post haste! If I am not quilty and have never committed a crime, I have nothing to fear!
66 posted on 04/26/2003 9:04:22 PM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: konaice
'I'm confident we have something totally unexpected up our sleve."

The top 200 men of the NK leadership may someday simultaneously develop "food poisoning", while at a planning meeting, and die.

The top 200 NK scientists may be overcome by noxious fumes and lose 50% of their brain cells.

67 posted on 04/26/2003 9:07:28 PM PDT by Mark Felton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
Don't forget that Tom Daschle is also concerned.
68 posted on 04/26/2003 9:12:01 PM PDT by David1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
The New York Slimes article glossed over Russia's Navy. What about their submarine fleet? I don't know whether this is fact or not, but don't they actually have more subs than we do? Plus, many very modern subs that are comparative to our own?

You mentioned star wars. The article said nothing about Russia's huge arsonal of ICBM's.
69 posted on 04/26/2003 9:14:45 PM PDT by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Brandon
Paradoxically, the runaway American victory in the conventional arms race might inspire a new round of proliferation of atomic weapons.

I'll be darned. It's so inspirational it inspired North Korea to join in proliferation before the ink was even dry on Jimmy and Slick Willy's nukes & food deal with North Korea in 1994, well before the inspirational American victory in Iraq. And of course there was Iraq's and Brazil's efforts to join the proliferation game in the 80s, all well before our inspirational victory in Iraq.

Now THAT's not just inspirational, it is PREEMPTIVELY inspirational.

70 posted on 04/26/2003 9:15:48 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Soldier
"Now, if you were to recommend we simply invade Mexico, push them back from the frontier and guard the border from their side, I think we could make a deal...ha."

You live in DreamLand, my friend. . .

Border Control!?

Kiramba!
We Ain't Got No Stinking Borders!!

71 posted on 04/26/2003 9:16:39 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (LIBERTY has arrived in Iraq - Now we can concentrate on HOLLYWEED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
The NY times is getting its talking points from the CATO institute...

The next step after a victory is, in left-liberal tradition, to undercut any chances of future victory... That way eventually they might get the quagmire situation they all have wet dreams for.

72 posted on 04/26/2003 9:19:09 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Or, something else might happen to their scientists...

North Korea - US denies hand in defection of Elite [Nuclear Scientists]

North Korea Admits Loss of Nuke Expert

And other things happen:

Explosion Hit North Korea Missile Test Site

73 posted on 04/26/2003 9:26:10 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
"With the influx of diversity I don't think we are going to be able to build up the internal strength to continue fighting the horrors of the world much longer." - B4Ranch

Just a little "sky is falling" reminder to help rain on your pity parade.

74 posted on 04/26/2003 9:29:07 PM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandon
All that and DeathStar is still under construction. No one in this galaxy can resist our armed might even now.
75 posted on 04/26/2003 9:36:55 PM PDT by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
"Now only a nuclear state, like, perhaps, North Korea, has any military leverage against the winner."

This line made me laugh outloud.

GREGG EASTERBROOK said the same thing in every paragraph. Some super power, can't protect our boarders from illegals crossing into America to rape our culture.

All of this power doesn't make me feel any safer in the homeland.

76 posted on 04/26/2003 9:45:27 PM PDT by Major_Risktaker ("No Risk, No Reward")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Major_Risktaker
Check out post #14. American Soldier has quite an idea there, one that I think is well worth looking into.
77 posted on 04/26/2003 9:47:00 PM PDT by Billy_bob_bob ("He who will not reason is a bigot;He who cannot is a fool;He who dares not is a slave." W. Drummond)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
Remember, the US is working on a space-based laser constellation that will be aimed at destroying a missile on its boost phase. The boost phase is the phase where the missile is more vulnerable because it would be rising up against gravity. At this stage, it would be very vulnerable from laser attack and MIRV will not work in this stage. Plus, the attacking country would be going against the risk that the destroyed missile would be dropping back over its own territory which would give an attacking country even more pause.
You can read more here:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/sbl.htm
and
http://www.acq.osd.mil/bmdo/
78 posted on 04/26/2003 9:51:03 PM PDT by David1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: judgeandjury
The average military man is tough but is not a culturally-sensitive ethnically aware Special Forces trooper with a 165 I.Q. and the ability to speak four language. Infantry, cavalry, i.e. normal front-line troops are not precision weapons. They are not good at worrying about people's feelings. Nor is it their job, as it is with cops, to understand the particular sensitivites and trends in a given neighborhood or precinct, since they are accustomed to being mobile.

Most of the people in a lot of those areas look Mexican and speak Spanish in the home. How in the hell is 18 year old Joe Trooper going to know who's who? Don't put him in that situation. It's a waste of resources.

The directions you mentioned giving to the soldiers sound familiar -- they sound like the training given to COPS! Let's let LEOs be LEOs and let soldiers be soldiers, 'eh?

79 posted on 04/26/2003 10:11:31 PM PDT by American Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: sasportas
In the height of the cold war the russkies had a submarine fleet of about 400. The U.S. had a sub fleet of a little over 100. But never let numbers fool you so much in military warfare. Because even though the russkies had numerical superiority, there submarines were very terrible and totally inadequate in fighting against another U.S. sub which were technologically superior to the Russian subs. However, to the end of the cold war and after it the technological gap started to close with the new advance Akula II. The Akula II is a sub that can be more comparable to our own Los Angeles class attack boats. In response, the US started building the freaking awesome Seawolf in response. 30 Seawolfs were supposed to be built to complement the Los Angeles class 688I subs, but the end of the cold war stopped the Seawolf plan. At 2 billion a pop the Seawolf was considered too costly for a post cold war period with the reduced tensions with the US. As a result, only 3 were built. In replacement of the Seawolf, a new, cheaper class of subs are being built called the Virginia class attack subs which will allow the US to maintain its superiority in undersea warfare. These will cost around 700 million each but will still
80 posted on 04/26/2003 10:12:13 PM PDT by David1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson