Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Registration on day of election considered Backers say plan would draw more voters
Winston Salem Journal ^ | April 17, 2003 | Dana Damico

Posted on 04/22/2003 10:44:03 AM PDT by Kuksool

Registration on day of election considered Backers say plan would draw more voters

By Dana Damico JOURNAL RALEIGH BUREAU

RALEIGH

Hoping to lure North Carolina's 1 million unregistered voters to the polls, state legislators are considering a proposal to allow people to vote on the same day that they register.

The proposal's supporters say that most people pay scant attention to candidates until the last few weeks of an election. And if they get motivated to vote then - but have not registered - they are out of luck. Current law requires people to register 25 days before an election.

Under the proposal, people qualified to vote could register and vote at one-stop voting sites that open 19 days before Election Day.

On Election Day, they could register and vote at a central site picked by county elections officials.

Six states offer so-called same-day registration.

"I'm one of the advocates that North Carolina should be the seventh state and remove this barrier (to voting)," said Rep. Earline Parmon, D-Forsyth. "It will help younger people get involved." Parmon said.

To discourage voter fraud, people would be required to show identification and proof of residency, and sign a statement swearing that the information they gave is accurate. They could be prosecuted for perjury - a felony - if they lie.

"There's more checks on this kind of voting than on any other kind of voting that you do in this state," said Rep. Deborah Ross, D-Wake, a chief sponsor of the bill that is scheduled for debate in a House committee today.

Chris Haggerty of the N.C. Center for Voter Education said he was initially skeptical of the proposal, given the history of voter fraud in North Carolina. But he said that the multiple security provisions put his doubts to rest.

To register, voters would have to show more personal documents than would be required to open a checking account or apply for a driver's license, he said.

"This is a proposal that has won me over," Haggerty said.

Democracy North Carolina, a campaign watchdog group that supports the legislation, says that 1 million North Carolinians 18 and older are not registered to vote, and 400,000 of them are between the ages of 18 and 34.

More than 200,000 of that group are under the age of 25.

"This is a bill that could really reach across a wide spectrum," said Bob Hall of Democracy North Carolina.

Sen. Patrick Ballantine, R-New Hanover, said that the proposal would not favor parties but help the hardest-working candidate.

"It's not a partisan issue," Ballantine said. "All parties are going to work to register people up to the last minute. This just extends the game into overtime.

"With the new technology, we ought to be able to handle it," he said.

Sen. Fletcher Hartsell, R-Cabarrus, agreed.

"If they're eligible to vote, qualified to vote, present themselves to vote - only once - then they should vote," Hartsell said. "Anything we can do to assist voter participation is useful for democracy. I'm not going to say it will significantly increase participation but it will."

Proponents figure that the proposal could improve North Carolina's voter turnout by 5 percent or more and pull the state from its near-bottom ranking in national voter turnout. Democracy North Carolina reports that state voter turnout ranked 44th in presidential elections from 1980 to 2000.

The six states that allow same-day registration - Idaho, Maine, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Wisconsin and Wyoming - had an average voter turnout rate of 61 percent in the 1996 and 2000 presidential elections, Hall said. About 47 percent of North Carolinians eligible to vote went to the polls in the two elections.

The N.C. Center for Public Policy Research released a report today on voter turnout that calls for a series of election reforms, including legislation to allow workers time off to vote and experimentation with voting by mail, as Oregon does, and by Internet, a process already in place in Alaska.

• Dana Damico can be reached in Raleigh at (919) 833-9916 or at ddamico@wsjournal.com


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: northcarolina; oldnorthstate; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: Deport Billary
So require more than a driver's license. There are ways of proving you're a legal citizen, without too much hassle on the part of the voter.
41 posted on 04/23/2003 10:02:25 AM PDT by Quick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Quick1
Well, at least they were able to stop the busses of Mondale voters that were coming in from neighboring states - college kids mainly - to register and vote for him on the same day.

Just because voter fraud isn't reported doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

If someone is paying attention during the election cycle there is no reason why s/he can't register prior to election day. And if you don't think the parties will round up people to vote on election day because they can register at the same time, you are in denial.

Personally, I could care less about the percentage of people who actually vote. My only concern is that those who vote understand and know what they are voting for. If this means fewer people participate in the voting process, so be it.

42 posted on 04/23/2003 10:07:44 AM PDT by Wphile (Keep the UN out of Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Quick1
It's a good one, and will get people more involved in politics.

It doesn't get more people involved in politics. If they are involved, they would have already been registered because they cared enough about it to be part of the process. It will get more people voting, but not more people involved in politics.

43 posted on 04/23/2003 10:09:20 AM PDT by Wphile (Keep the UN out of Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Quick1
Most democrats do not want to require ANYTHING for voter registration. Not even a driver's license. That discriminates against minorities who don't have drivers licenses. There are not many states that currently have same day voter registration. Minnesota is one of them and California just voted it in but I can't think of many others. It's a bad, bad idea.
44 posted on 04/23/2003 10:11:14 AM PDT by Wphile (Keep the UN out of Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
I'd rather have a higher percentage of voters, and have all of them knowing what they're voting for. Is that too diffucult a goal?

The first step is getting people involved in the political process again. Once they start caring about it, they will educate themselves.
45 posted on 04/23/2003 10:11:23 AM PDT by Quick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Quick1
Fine. Get them involved. Just do it BEFORE election day.
46 posted on 04/23/2003 10:13:41 AM PDT by Wphile (Keep the UN out of Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
I disagree. I think a lot of people consider registration as a hassle, and treat it as such. People want to be able to simply go in and vote for their person, without any hassles.
47 posted on 04/23/2003 10:14:08 AM PDT by Quick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
We'll have to agree to disagree. However, in the few states that have it currently, it has worked well, by increasing turnout, with no evidence (thus far) of voter fraud. I will let that stand as proof.
48 posted on 04/23/2003 10:16:56 AM PDT by Quick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Quick1
I have to fire one more quick shot. :)

Do you support bills that enforce waiting periods on guns, to allow checking for felony records?
49 posted on 04/23/2003 10:20:39 AM PDT by Quick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
This idea is a bunch of cr*pola!

Anybody who doesn't take the time/effort to register under the existing liberal laws doesn't care enough to inform themselves on the issues and people being voted upon.

So, who needs more uninformed voters pulling the levers? (answer:"Democrats")

50 posted on 04/23/2003 10:27:04 AM PDT by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
I too have moved on, that is why I didn't come back and make this response.
51 posted on 04/23/2003 10:32:31 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (I'm a movin on, I'm a movin on.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Quick1
It's the reason Jesse Ventura won

This indicates that those who will most benefit from election-day registration are those who probably aren't regular voters, those who have a particular ax to grind, and will likely vote for the hell-raiser on the ballot. Obviously, I'm not opposed to people voting for whomever they want, I would hope that the vast majority of voters would cast their votes after serious and long consideration, and not just on a whim that hits them on election day. As long as there are no structural or institutional barriers to making the voting franchise available to all, I have no problem with people having to register to vote well in advance of election day; in fact, that's my preference. As I said earlier, I don't want my well-considered vote being cancelled out by someone who comes to the polls at the last minute, probably votes in ignorance, and didn't have enough interest in the election to register earlier.

52 posted on 04/23/2003 10:41:21 AM PDT by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Quick1
Can we assume that if, God forbid, you were in need of surgery, say, brain or heart-you would feel more comfortable with an operating room, overflowing with wannabe surgeons, demanding to assist in your operation, after being talked into attending Medical School that very day?

As important as the success of that operation may be to you personally, it's nothing at all to the rest of us, compared to the importance of our elections, that you are perfectly willing to trust to a bunch of semi-literate conscripts,rounded up and herded to in to register and vote, the day of the election.

Sorry, but quality trumps quantity on election days.
53 posted on 04/23/2003 11:11:04 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (Only previously Registered Useful Idiots may be bought or rented on election day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
Glad to see that. It's not even visible in my rearview mirrow.
54 posted on 04/23/2003 11:12:20 AM PDT by JohnnyZ (Fritz Hollings is Foghorn Leghorn? Then who's Henry Hawk?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson