Skip to comments.
Catholic Church asks Tom Daschle to stop calling himself a Catholic
Weekly Standard (via Matt Drudge) ^
| April 17, 2003
| SB00
Posted on 04/17/2003 9:36:31 AM PDT by SB00
TOM DASCHLE may no longer call himself a Catholic. The Senate minority leader and the highest ranking Democrat in Washington has been sent a letter by his home diocese of Sioux Falls, sources in South Dakota have told The Weekly Standard, directing him to remove from his congressional biography and campaign documents all references to his standing as a member of the Catholic Church.
This isn't exactly excommunication--which is unnecessary, in any case, since Daschle made himself ineligible for communion almost 20 years ago with his divorce and remarriage to a Washington lobbyist. The directive from Sioux Falls' Bishop Robert Carlson is rather something less than excommunication--and, at the same time, something more: a declaration that Tom Daschle's religious identification constitutes, in technical Catholic vocabulary, a grave public scandal. He was brought up as a Catholic, and he may still be in some sort of genuine mental and spiritual relation to the Church. Who besides his confessor could say? But Daschle's consistent political opposition to Catholic teachings on moral issues--abortion, in particular--has made him such a problem for ordinary churchgoers that the Church must deny him the use of the word "Catholic."
(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Philosophy; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: catholic; catholiclist; daschle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 441-455 next last
To: SB00
Wow! The Catholic Church disowning a public figure (even a bad one like D'asshole) starts a seed of respect for the church.
To: CFIIIMEIATP737
How many 'buts' does it take before hypocrisy is rampant and we can't believe anything that is being said? I don't know. How many "butts" are in the Democrat Party?
To: Revolting cat!
Diane Feinstein's next!Don't forget Lieberman...
43
posted on
04/17/2003 10:07:43 AM PDT
by
bruin66
To: SB00; MattinNJ; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; ..
44
posted on
04/17/2003 10:08:26 AM PDT
by
Coleus
(RU-486 Kills Babies)
To: SB00
45
posted on
04/17/2003 10:09:30 AM PDT
by
\/\/ayne
To: SB00
46
posted on
04/17/2003 10:10:20 AM PDT
by
Coleus
(RU-486 Kills Babies)
To: xsmommy
PING!!!!!
47
posted on
04/17/2003 10:11:17 AM PDT
by
hobbes1
( Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
To: hobbes1
couldn't happen to a nicer midget....
48
posted on
04/17/2003 10:11:41 AM PDT
by
xsmommy
To: \/\/ayne
49
posted on
04/17/2003 10:12:03 AM PDT
by
Coleus
(RU-486 Kills Babies)
To: hobbes1
PONG!
50
posted on
04/17/2003 10:12:26 AM PDT
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I support FR monthly; and ABBCNNBCBS (continue to) Lie!)
To: southernbychoice
The practice is rampant (it goes on in my own family, too), but it's still wrong.
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
ROTFL!
52
posted on
04/17/2003 10:13:29 AM PDT
by
hobbes1
( Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
To: SB00
"has made him such a problem for ordinary churchgoers that the Church must deny him the use of the word "Catholic." I submit that he has been such a problem for ordinary citizens of the United States that we must deny him use of the words "Human Being" and "Fellow Americans".
53
posted on
04/17/2003 10:15:04 AM PDT
by
dokmad
To: SoDak
This is really impressive...Way to go!
54
posted on
04/17/2003 10:16:18 AM PDT
by
livius
(Let slip the cats of conjecture!)
To: SB00
Are we still permitted to call him a Daschole?
55
posted on
04/17/2003 10:16:21 AM PDT
by
Hank Rearden
(Dick Gephardt. Before he dicks you.)
To: SB00
speechless bump
56
posted on
04/17/2003 10:16:29 AM PDT
by
swheats
To: bruin66
Don't forget Lieberman...The Catholic Church's history with Jews is forced conversion (or death), not ex-communication. My wife's family traced their lineage to Spain and the Inquisition where their Jewish surname suddenly changed to a Catholic surname.
To: southernbychoice
Is it still the case that they should not receive communion? My father's marriage to my mother has never been annulled, yet he and his new wife joined a parish, and receive communion every week. If the first marriage was not annulled, then he is still married to your mother. In which case his "new wife" is not his wife at all.
That's called "adultery," and people engaged in it are in a state of mortal sin. Taking communion in a state of sin is forbidden.
SD
To: dokmad
I submit that he has been such a problem for ordinary citizens of the United States that we must deny him use of the words "Human Being" and "Fellow Americans". LOL!
59
posted on
04/17/2003 10:19:39 AM PDT
by
RAT Patrol
(Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
To: SoothingDave
[P]eople engaged in it are in a state of mortal sin.
Objectively, yes.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 441-455 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson