Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Shia Of Najaf Seethe Ominously, Fearing The Yoke Of US Occupation
Independent (UK) ^ | 4-16-2003 | Phil Reeves

Posted on 04/15/2003 5:23:32 PM PDT by blam

The Shia of Najaf seethe ominously, fearing the yoke of US occupation

By Phil Reeves in Najaf
16 April 2003

The message could not have been clearer if the Grand Ayatollah Sayyid Ali al-Sistani himself had broadcast it from the battery of loudspeakers that hang above the breathtaking blue mosaics lining the walls of his mosque.

The powerful cleric's multitude of followers in Najaf, one of the holiest Shia cities, will not accept an Iraqi government run by anyone they see as a stooge of the occupying Americans.

They are not interested in retired Lieutenant-General Jay Garner, the rumbustious former missile contractor leading the effort to rebuild Iraq, who – 150 miles further down the Euphrates – was chairing the first meeting of selected Iraqi opposition groups. Objecting to the American general's role, the largest Shia party, the Iranian-based Supreme Council for the Revolution in Iraq, refused to go.

And they have nothing good to say about Ahmed Chalabi, the Iraqi businessman, convicted fraudster and favourite of the Pentagon hawks. After decades in exile, he was spirited into Nasiriyah last week by US forces and has since formed his own militia.

Bearded men drawn by the sight of a foreigner who, for once, was without an Iraqi government snoop and who had not swept into Najaf with the US tanks, crowded around yesterday, desperate for these views to be heard.

As we sat in the sun and the swirling dust, their theme was the same, time and again. They were delighted the Americans had got rid of Saddam Hussein, whose thugs had oppressed the Shias, killing clerics and closing mosques, and whose social engineering had left them in profound poverty.

The US and Britain must fulfil their obligations under Geneva Conventions as occupiers, they said. The Allies must establish order, end the looting and provide power, medicine, and food supplies. Then they must leave.

"Iraq has to be run by people from Iraq, people who lived in Iraq and not from the outside," said one of the crowd, Favel Mohammed Roda, a fiery-eyed man in a white robe. "Then Americans must get out." The others shouted agreement.

Iraq's Shia community is seething, consumed by fears about its place in the new Iraq. Being the majority, they talk hopefully of democracy. Yet they are haunted by the suspicion of conspiracies to split their ranks. Some here say these plots are the work of die-hard Saddamists; others suspect the hand of the CIA, suggesting the US is moving to prevent them becoming the most powerful force in the land by sheer numbers.

Such suspicions were thriving yesterday in the narrow lanes of Najaf. A crowd of men, the heads of Shia families, had donned their robes and turbans and travelled in from outlying villages. They gathered outside Ayatollah Sistani's headquarters yards from the golden-domed Iman Ali shrine, brandishing banners proclaiming the unity of Iraq's Shias. They had come to defend the cleric after learning his premises had been surrounded by armed men, who had demanded he leave Iraq in 48 hours.

The cleric was nowhere to be seen, but his son said he was safe. "There is no government and there are a lot of weapons in the hands of dangerous people," he said.Six days ago, one of the ayatollah's close associates, Abdul Majid al-Khoei, was stabbed to death by a mob in the shrine.Mr Khoei was an acquaintance of Tony Blair and Jack Straw, and had returned to Iraq after 12 years in exile in London, bearing the weight of Washington and Whitehall's hopes that he would help lead Iraq's Shias towards a pro-US government, and away from the magnetic pull of neighbouring Iran.

His US links may have cost him his life. "He is so close to the Americans he might as well have driven in on an American tank," Mr Roda said. But he may also have been killed because he went to the shrine with a cleric loathed by Najaf's Shias. They said the cleric had ties to the dictator's killers who murdered another revered ayatollah, Mohammed al-Sadr, in 1998. And in the town of Kut, a strongly anti-American cleric called Said Abbas this week took control of city hall with 30 armed men.

Outside, several hundred Iranians living in Iraq protested against the American-led invasion. They singled out the man they know the Pentagon's hardliners favour. "No to Chalabi!" they shouted.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chalabi; iia; iraq; iraqifreedom; kut; najaf; occupation; orha; saidabbas; seethe; shia; shiite; us
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
From one despot to another? These people are idiots!!
1 posted on 04/15/2003 5:23:32 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

"It's Time to Pony Up".


Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-


2 posted on 04/15/2003 5:25:18 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
This group is backed by Iran -- this is Iran trying to stir up trouble, as we knew they would.
3 posted on 04/15/2003 5:25:47 PM PDT by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
"The Allies must establish order, end the looting and provide power, medicine, and food supplies. Then they must leave."

It's still the plan.

4 posted on 04/15/2003 5:27:18 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Sigh. We can only give them the chance. We can't make them choose wisely.
5 posted on 04/15/2003 5:31:08 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
So if they choose poorly, then we end up having to invade again?
6 posted on 04/15/2003 5:34:49 PM PDT by Billy_bob_bob ("He who will not reason is a bigot;He who cannot is a fool;He who dares not is a slave." W. Drummond)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ellery
This group is backed by Iran -- this is Iran trying to stir up trouble, as we knew they would.

Won't matter. We have their number. Democracy IS coming to Iraq.

7 posted on 04/15/2003 5:35:12 PM PDT by toddst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
This is being stirred up by the Iraqi Mullah who has been living in Iran for the last 15 to 20 years. This guy wants to take over the city and he's stirring up the natives. I just hope the Iraqi people are smart enough to see through his efforts. I think he brought a ton of followers with him.
8 posted on 04/15/2003 5:36:50 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
If their leaders start trafficking in terror again...They need to get over this victimhood crap. People can only take advantage of them if they let them. We aren't about to, but their neighbors will. If the Iraqis don't stick together they are going to be toast.
9 posted on 04/15/2003 5:39:22 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
Iran should be put on notice that they are on thin ice, and shi'ite can happen.
10 posted on 04/15/2003 5:40:12 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam
Then they will just be left out of the process. They are idiots.
11 posted on 04/15/2003 5:43:45 PM PDT by delightfully dingy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: blam
Iran wants to keep us occupied. Better that their puppet Iraqis attract our attention than them eh? The best thing to do is broadcast every day about how the Shiites are getting left out because of this guy, how the participants in the Democratic process are voting themselves aid and reconstruction. How the Shiites are being held back by their own Mullahs.

Then we should go to the individual Shiite villages and offer them the opportunity to come to the meeting from the grassroots level and ignore Iran's Mullah. Let this Mullah compete with our broadcasting power, with our money, with our food, with our Construction brigades. He can't do it.
13 posted on 04/15/2003 5:44:35 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: blam
Outside, several hundred Iranians living in Iraq protested against the American-led invasion. They singled out the man they know the Pentagon's hardliners favour. "No to Chalabi!" they shouted.

Reeves is an lefty idiot looking for any anti-American angle he can. He slipped up here, though. He forgot to omit the word "Iranians."

15 posted on 04/15/2003 5:45:24 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamole
Exactly. They appear to be rather irrelevant outside of Najaf. If Najaf wants to secede from Iraq and become a Shiite Vatican City, that might be a good thing.

I think we can make this into a mini-Iranian revolution if we play our cards right. If we can beat this Mullah here in the hearts and minds department then we can beat his bosses in Tehran the same way. We could turn Iran's meddling into a referendum on Iran's rule possibly.
16 posted on 04/15/2003 5:46:56 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blam
From one despot to another? These people are idiots!!

You got that right! ... Islam is Peace® strikes again.

Brent Scowcroft wrote:
What’s going to happen the first time we hold an election in Iraq and it turns out the radicals win?   What do you do? We’re surely not going to let them take over."
Rummy pointed out on Meet the Press the following:
The basic principles that President Bush has properly put forward are these, that the Saddam Hussein regime has to go, that the new Iraqi government, whatever it is, be selected by the Iraqi people, that it not have weapons of mass destruction, that it not threaten its neighbors, that it be a single country and that the people of that country be free to put themselves on some kind of a path towards a representative system that protects the rights of the minorities and the ethnic groups in that country.
Of course Shi'a are going to cry foul... the Sharia law that they strive to put into place does *not* adhere to Bush's principles.  I say:  let 'em seethe... screw them, their sharia garbage and the dhimmitude that accompanies it!   The Status of Non-Muslim Minorities Under Islamic Rule
17 posted on 04/15/2003 5:55:31 PM PDT by GirlShortstop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Evidently, the "Grand" Ayatollah Sayyid Ali al-Sistani isn't receiving enough hush-up money. It is my understanding that President Carter's refusal to keep paying the imams brought on their wrath.
18 posted on 04/15/2003 5:55:32 PM PDT by EverOnward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
YES they are.... relgious idiots.

The conquered radical Islamists and the inexperienced sheep who cower in fear at their edicts MUST NOT have a voice in HOW they will form a new government... until they shake off the repressions of their extremist relgious convictions... stoning collaborators, jews and christians... or shooting women who wear white sox in public...

The idea of a CONSTITUTIONAL democracy may be workable in a decade... but these mullahs LOVE MOUTHING support of a pure democracy... as long as THEIR group is the majority... They must never see it in their lifetimes... unless it is from behind bars.

It wil be necessary to SUBJUGATE the extremist, anti-western, mullahs, or force them to convert to a more moderate version of Islam, otherwise they will never grasp the western concept of tolerance...

After islam is overhauled to include elements and rules of behavior that will forever destroy it's desire to weld church and state into a hardened tyranny... it will be safe for the formation of it's own form of democratic reform... and not until.

These mullahs who paid no price for their own freedom, and would institute their own versions of shariac tyranny must never be allowed any place in governance. EVER.

Religious extremism has NO Place in secular governance... Ceasar's stuff belongs to Ceasar... and the things of God belong to God alone... not the totalitarian religionists campaigning to be HIS rulers over others, in this life and on this earth.

Arabists are terrified that we have determined to crack their religious nut... and it will take decades to wipe them all out...

19 posted on 04/15/2003 5:56:04 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (What price treason?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ellery
Yes ellery....and it spins out to much broader parameters.

The Lunatic ..Ayatollah Khomenie of the late 70's brought his fundamentilism to Iran...in a short time..his child prodigy "Hizbullah" ..Party of God began to appear in South Lebanon.
Coupled with P.L.O. and other terror orgs propped up by Syria...Israel went "Bull loose in a China shop " on them in 1982...blowing thru them ..eventually encircling Beruit where Yasser Arafat and company finally fled to distant points on the globe.

Irans "Magi" have been in the courts of Damascus Syria since that time..and continue to garden their Holdings in South Lebanon.
Iran can "Turn it up" easily via the Mosque..via the terror orgs..then sit back and reap the return.
Time may however be running out on Tehrans end game..same for Damascus.
They may curtail trouble...allow just enough to keep the food simmering..but not giving Israel cause to Invade Lebanon again.

Unless they are really nuts...my guess is they are banking on time...time which will see more carrier battle groups leave the region..most especially the Med off Lebanon and Syria.

Cagey bunch...they are patient and resourcefull.
If need be...they can wisk most of the terrorists out of Lebanon..satisfy Washington..then bring them back latter...start it up all over again.

20 posted on 04/15/2003 5:57:47 PM PDT by Light Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson