Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Online petition to save surplus rifles
Save the M-14 surplus ^

Posted on 04/03/2003 9:28:14 PM PST by newyorkronin

US govt to needlessly destroy BRAND NEW, NEVER ISSUED M-14 rifles in inventory. Sign this petition to Congress to sell off rifles to law abiding civilians instead of wasting them.

http://www.petitiononline.com/M14CMP03/


TOPICS: Announcements
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; cmp; dcm; m14; odcmp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last
To: newyorkronin
bump
41 posted on 04/04/2003 1:36:08 AM PST by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Your village misses you.
42 posted on 04/04/2003 4:14:44 AM PST by LibKill (MOAB, the greatest advance in Foreign Relations since the cat-o'-nine-tails!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fire_eye
I have fired many and own two examples of the AR-15/M-16 family.

Recently picked up an M1A (semi M-14) Your friend is right, these things are awesome, just playing around at the range, firing quickly (about one shot every five seconds) I was dinging the 200yd plate about 80%-90% of the time with OPEN SIGHTS.

With a little practice and a scope 600yds hits should be easy.
43 posted on 04/04/2003 4:46:22 AM PST by E.Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Trailerpark Badass
Yeh. The BATFags claim that "once a full auto, always a full auto" which is of course bullshit. The Congress could tell the ATF to change that regulation.
44 posted on 04/04/2003 5:29:58 AM PST by Rifleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Sounds like a typical internet legend to me.

The liberals in Congress have been trying to destroy the CMP (Civilian Marksmanship Program) for years.

45 posted on 04/04/2003 5:32:09 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Trailerpark Badass
I was at a gun show where one of the vendors had a nice M60. with the action sporting a huge weld...
46 posted on 04/04/2003 5:39:04 AM PST by KneelBeforeZod (Deus Lo Volt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fire_eye
i went through cadet basic training at west point using an M14. We also used them for parades while i was there...they probably still use them. It is a very heavy and sturdy rifle. I remember rifle runs with bayonets fixed...man, talk about feeling like a badass. Then we had bayonet training using M14s. If you have to have hand to hand combat, i'd go for the M14 over the M16...if you butt stroke someone with the M14, they will surely remember.

After i graduated and went to infantry units, we used M16's of course. They are much lighter, but also, in my opinion, not as rugged as the venerable M14. The thing about M16's is some can be decently accurate (say out to 300 m), but in my experience, about 50% in my armsroom really had to be tinkered with before they could acheive decent accuracy. I've fired many that were not accurate. The sights on the M16A1 I always thought should have a better design.

One Saturday i took my wife out to a range on post to teach her how to handle a 9mm (POW-privately owned weapon). The marksmanship team happened to be firing on the same range and they had an M14. They asked me if I wanted to try it out. I said sure. I picked it up and damned if i didn't nail the 10 ring at 300 meters on the 1st shot. This rifle really impressed me. I've wanted to buy one every since then, but can't afford it. A classmate from wp once showed me the website where vets can order one, but they are still very expensive (around $1500-$2500 as I recall) and I can't afford one. Based upon this one experience though, i suspect with a good M14, someone could make accurate shots out to 1000 m, an impossible feat with an M16.

Just compare the sights on both weapons. The M14 sights are much better for accuracy and ease of adjustment. The M14 is the best rifle i ever handled. My two cents.
47 posted on 04/04/2003 5:57:41 AM PST by OldCorps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: newyorkronin
A bit of a Relic looking thing. Sure doubt I'd want to buy one. Did sign the petition though. It bothers me to see totally good machinery junked. Plus they can actually Make money with this program.
48 posted on 04/04/2003 6:39:51 AM PST by Joined2Justify (Smoke screens were build by the Oil Burners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoverbug
Illbay's been overdue for a nap for years now :)
49 posted on 04/04/2003 8:44:19 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rasputin_TheMadMonk
Thanks for the comments.
50 posted on 04/04/2003 9:08:52 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
From what you're saying the M-14 wasn't available for WWII. Is that right? Was the M-14 in the "Combat" television series (Vic Morrow) a fiction? I'm not knowledgeable enough to know.
51 posted on 04/04/2003 9:11:08 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: quietolong
There were M-1s to be sure, but Vic Morrow's character definately carried what I believe to be an M-14.
52 posted on 04/04/2003 9:12:15 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: newyorkronin
The Clinton Administration spent millions of dollars on machinery whose sole purpose was to destroy M-14s!

I have wanted one since I carried one through Basic and AIT in 1965!

53 posted on 04/04/2003 9:14:08 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
"Isn't there a "gunnuts.com" or someplace else where most people would actually care?"

Guess again, buddy. There are a lot of us on the forum who find this important, and not just because we are "gunnuts".

Life must be slow on DU these days, eh?

54 posted on 04/04/2003 9:15:46 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ursus arctos horribilis
"Pity the unarmed, for they are useless."

Don't waste your pity...they mostly unarmed by choice...Darwin at work.

55 posted on 04/04/2003 9:16:59 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LibKill
"Your village misses you."

But they are all at the range, practicing!

56 posted on 04/04/2003 9:20:41 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Morrow carried a Thompson 45 submachine gun. The Lieutenant carried an M-1 Carbine.
57 posted on 04/04/2003 9:21:46 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: quietolong
  

Check these out.  Photos one and three are actually larger than shown and can be viewed full size by right clicking, view.

58 posted on 04/04/2003 9:25:02 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Illbay; Hoverbug; Nov3; Trailerpark Badass; Ursus arctos horribilis; fish hawk; LibKill; ...

"Gun Nut".

59 posted on 04/04/2003 9:25:56 AM PST by Constitution Day ("They haif said. Quhat say they? Lat thame say.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
Have I misidentified the Thompson 45? Check out the weapon shown in post 48? That's certainly a possibility. I had always thought it was an M-14.
60 posted on 04/04/2003 9:27:02 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson