Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS Producer Sees Bush as Another Hitler
NewsMax.com ^ | 4/03/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 04/03/2003 11:27:21 AM PST by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: RLJVet; doug from upland
Let's keep Hitler in mind when viewing the 'power-is-everything--ends-justify-means--ideology-before-nation' Democrats.
21 posted on 04/03/2003 11:49:32 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I guess what bothers me is not their blind hatred of Bush. Hell, these people have been programmed to hate people like Bush from their red-diaper infancy through their Ivy League indoctrination. What bothers me is their stunning ignorance of who Hitler really was and what he really stood for.

If they want to see potential Hitlers, all they need do is look in the mirror. They have all the characteristics.

22 posted on 04/03/2003 11:49:33 AM PST by Ditto (You are free to form your own opinions, but not your own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The overwhelming and breathtaking ignorance of the media/popular culture of the conditions by which the Nazis came into power is stupifying.
23 posted on 04/03/2003 11:52:37 AM PST by Skooz (Tagline removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: Im Your Huckleberry
The Demonrats are now failed politically-driven socialist traitors going coup-coup.
25 posted on 04/03/2003 11:54:36 AM PST by Liberals are Evil Socialists!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: kattracks
Here is two questions for all of you conservatives armchair quarterbacks.

How come Dan, Peter, and Tom are still news anchors? Better yet, why is a Canadian telling us what is news or not?

Or that ABC, CBS and NBC haven't changed the format of their biased news programs?

If the ratings are so true that cable news is beating the pants off the network competition, it makes no sense to me to why they would stay with a losing business model...

27 posted on 04/03/2003 11:56:56 AM PST by John123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Sure...but he has no real critical assessment of Saddam and what he was doing to his people. These people really need to be ignored.

BTW...has anyone noticed how the volume of maggots like this producer and his ilk is getting louder and louder the closer our troops get to victory?
28 posted on 04/03/2003 11:58:06 AM PST by Constitutional Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Im Your Huckleberry
heh heh !
29 posted on 04/03/2003 11:59:16 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Saddam! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: John123
Your questions have been answered by Michael Medved in his book "Hollywood vs America." Although he specifically addresses the movies, I am sure the same situation holds true for TV news.
30 posted on 04/03/2003 12:00:51 PM PST by Skooz (Tagline removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing

Something's not kosher with this photograph.

31 posted on 04/03/2003 12:02:39 PM PST by Slings and Arrows (Jack Russell Terriers: G-d's way of telling you "Your lawn is too nice.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
Your questions have been answered by Michael Medved in his book "Hollywood vs America." Although he specifically addresses the movies, I am sure the same situation holds true for TV news.

I haven't read the book but I don't see a correlation between Hollywood and Network news shows. Hollywood has to make money but the networks don't seem to follow that premise.

32 posted on 04/03/2003 12:07:36 PM PST by John123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Oh, fer cryin' out freakin' loud...

Now I wish I watched CBS News so I could boycott 'em. Thank goodness for FOX!

33 posted on 04/03/2003 12:10:04 PM PST by Allegra (Pray for our troops...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
"I guess what bothers me is not their blind hatred of Bush."

Be of good cheer. All this does is provide verification that President Bush and the rest of us who love America and its blessings are on the right track.....

34 posted on 04/03/2003 12:11:19 PM PST by tracer (/b>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Thats it. I will buy NOTHING from any company that has any connection with CBS!
35 posted on 04/03/2003 12:13:20 PM PST by gulfcoast6 (REALLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows
Something's not kosher with this photograph.

I forgot my disclaimer regarding no offense intended to pigs the world over? . . .

36 posted on 04/03/2003 12:16:56 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Saddam! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing; .45MAN; FreedomPoster; RobFromGa; nicmarlo; sweetliberty; LBGA; backhoe
Another anti-American *puke* speaks out {{{{ping}}}}

Thanks for the heads-up, meekie.
37 posted on 04/03/2003 12:19:19 PM PST by dansangel (America - love it, support it, or LEAVE IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
How come liberals can't get over slavery, WWII, the civil rights movement, and Vietnam? We do have quite a bit more history than that.
38 posted on 04/03/2003 12:19:36 PM PST by DeuceTraveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dansangel
Another anti-American *puke* speaks out

You mean, "another anti-American *pukes* out! : )

39 posted on 04/03/2003 12:20:52 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; snopercod; joanie-f; mommadooo3; brityank; harpseal; JeanS
Hillary Clinton as Hitler, born again in one of the devil's many disquises, is easily self-evident; she detests the rule of and would much rather have her rule by Party judges and judge-made law; she is nearly, completely opposed to adherence to the due process of our democratic-republic and only follows along with it as she finds this process useful to her rise to power; she vicariously has become the controlling interest in a vast leftwing media empire that is being built as a propaganda machine loyal only to her (Evercore Partners, NYC); the Bill of Rights are uttlerly stripped, by her, of their purpose, which is to affirm a few of our many, yet very important, individual freedoms by which we protect ourselves from government abuse, excess, and tyranny; etc.

What Mr. Gernon is trying to convey, is that a person who is concious of the need of the people to muster their indivdual rights into a well-regulated, Armed military force, for their common defense, to exercise martial power authorized by the duly elected representatives of the people sitting in legislature ... this, Mr. Gernon is trying to sell, is "militarism."

Instead of all the lawful heritage and our respect for due process by which we defend liberty, Mr. Gernon asks his followers and audience to stare only at "militarism." With the paint brush and many layers of the available imagery of Hitler's use of Germany's state police, state security military, and military, all very harsh and "very scary," on this point, he piles on his fears of it; that, he wants us to buy.

Well, I agree that the worst killer throughout history, second to disease, has been bad government and its abuse, its excess, and its tyranical use of its martial power: its militarism.

What escapes Mr. Gernon, is that, "militarism" is exactly this terror: bad government and its coercive manifestations.

Hitler's ill will makes great film drama, because it was captured on film. While Lenin and Stalin's ill will --- because of the fact that the socialists (thank the leftists, such as Mr. Gernon and his companions for extermination and then extermination of the records of the extermination) were smart enough to bury the story --- has not made such great film drama. To wit: Hitler's national socialist militarism is available to see much more readily than Lenin and Stalin's and Hillary Clinton's nationalizing socialist militarism.

The vast left wing being marginally more devious on the public record, "in the name of peace," whenever you inquire about the left's coercive ways --- the proof --- you get the same answer:

"I don't recall."

The more Mr. Gernon makes an argument for Hitler's national socialist militarism, the more this sad show blocks the view of Hillary's nationalizing socialist militarism coming to a theatre of operations near you.

40 posted on 04/03/2003 12:24:25 PM PST by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson