Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former CNN reporter says U.S. war planners ignored Iraqi resistance
AP WorldStream via COMTEX ^ | 3-30-03

Posted on 03/30/2003 5:16:21 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

CAIRO, Egypt, Mar 30, 2003 (AP WorldStream via COMTEX) -- A former CNN journalist told state-run Iraqi TV that U.S. war planners had misjudged Iraq's determination to stand up to the American-led coalition's invasion force.

"Clearly, the American war plans misjudged the determination of the Iraqi forces," Peter Arnett said during the interview aired Sunday by Iraq's satellite television station and monitored by The Associated Press in Egypt.

Arnett, who won a Pulitzer Prize reporting in Vietnam for The Associated Press, garnered much of his prominence from covering the 1991 Gulf War in Baghdad. He is now reporting from the Iraqi capital for NBC.

During his prerecorded Baghdad studio interview, which was translated by a green military uniform-wearing Iraqi anchor, Arnett said the Bush administration had ignored his and other reports about "the determination of the Iraqi armed forces and the government willingness to fight for their country."

It was not immediately clear when the interview was conducted.

Arnett was the on-air reporter of the 1998 CNN report that accused American forces of using sarin gas on a Laotian village in 1970 to kill U.S. defectors. Two CNN employees were sacked and Arnett was reprimanded over the report, which the station later retracted. Arnett ultimately left the network.

Arnett established close contacts with Iraqi government officials during his several visits to Iraq, but was unable to reflect anti-government sentiments through private interviews with Iraqis without the presence of Information Ministry minders.

President George Bush, the current U.S. leader's father, accused Arnett of being a "traitor" over what he considered were pro-Iraqi reports during the 1991 conflict.

"Whenever I gave a report (in 1991) of civilian casualties or civilian installations destroyed and casualties created, the Pentagon and Bush administration got very angry and called me traitor," he said on Iraqi Television.

Of the current conflict, Arnett also said the current U.S. invasion plan had failed and that American military strategists are now "trying to write another war plan."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: arnett; ccrm; cnn; nbc; peterarnett; pmsnbc; presstitutes; propaganda; saddamophilia; traitorlist; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-210 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"Any chance he had a gun to his head during this "interview"? "

Peter Arnett doesn't need a gun to his head to propagandize against America! He's quite happy to do it voluntarily.
21 posted on 03/30/2003 5:42:04 AM PST by SolutionsOnly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
I like who is in charge at the Pentagon and in the field. The out of the loop retireds,press,commentators,polititions are but noise,chirping crickets that annoy.
22 posted on 03/30/2003 5:44:01 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Former CNN reporter...ha ha, imagine listing that on your CV
23 posted on 03/30/2003 5:45:18 AM PST by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
What did Arnett not know and when did he not know it?
24 posted on 03/30/2003 5:50:09 AM PST by lonestar (Don't mess with Texans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Use It Or Lose It
Ouch !
25 posted on 03/30/2003 5:52:35 AM PST by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Of the current conflict, Arnett also said the current U.S. invasion plan had failed and that American military strategists are now "trying to write another war plan."

There simply is no precedent for the one-sidedness of this war. It is obvious that defeat is a drop-dead certainty.

So we should just cut our losses and go home.

26 posted on 03/30/2003 5:57:12 AM PST by wayoverontheright (</sarcasm>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
We need to start a list of how many stories different reporters write that are wrong. Reporters that are shown to have a high rate of WRONG stories will lose credibility.
27 posted on 03/30/2003 5:58:00 AM PST by slate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Use It Or Lose It
Brian Williams hates Rummy as much as any person I have seen yet.

The morning after the first bombs fell in Baghdad, Brian is the commentator who compared it to Dresden, and said that Rummy was about to "SWAGGER" out for the upcoming press conference.

I was so livid I sent an e-mail, to MSNBC, however they do not have Brian Williams' e-mail available on their WEB site.

Petie is in welcomed company with Brian Williams.
28 posted on 03/30/2003 6:00:30 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
So is he reporting for NBC as well as CNBC, MSNBC?

If so, so much for MSNBC on my watch list - conservative network my "arss"!!!
29 posted on 03/30/2003 6:03:06 AM PST by AgThorn (Continue to pray for our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Use It Or Lose It
I've just removed my National Geographic bookmark.
Damn, I liked [past tense] that Website...8^(
30 posted on 03/30/2003 6:03:48 AM PST by ThreePuttinDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AgThorn
So is he reporting for NBC as well as CNBC, MSNBC?


One and the same
31 posted on 03/30/2003 6:07:55 AM PST by ThreePuttinDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
This is the same guy who aired the tailwind story. He is an America Hater. At least CNN had the sense to fire him after that, and trust the BBC to pick him up.
32 posted on 03/30/2003 6:09:49 AM PST by cardinal4 (The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
Oh how I wish an "errant" bomb would hit his motel. Otherwise, he should be arrested when given the chance. He is supposed to be interviewing Iraqis. Not the other way around. And I'd bet he asked to be interviewed. I can't believe the Iraqis would be smart enough to use him. Unless there WAS a gun pointed at his head.
33 posted on 03/30/2003 6:11:44 AM PST by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross
No, I agree with you, he probably requested to be interviewed. Ill bet his hatred for America is only exceeded by his vanity.
34 posted on 03/30/2003 6:31:04 AM PST by cardinal4 (The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
He is now reporting from the Iraqi capital for NBC.

Actually he is reporting for a subsidary of NBC; Namely: National Geographic.

35 posted on 03/30/2003 6:42:51 AM PST by scouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Regardless of the reason for the pause of our troops in Iraq, I see this as something much better than the media envisions. This gives our troops a chance to rest and relax. A chance to "get fat" (as explained on TV, resupply with food, water, ammunition, and repair equipment) while the RG are still being bombarded. Our troops, being almost to Baghdad, limits the area the RG can spread out into.

This break in the action, also allows our forces to the north to coalesce with the Kurds that are fighting on our side. Thanks to Turkey it's giving us a chance to build up our forces in the north too.

In 1991 it took 30 days of bombing so soften up the enemy. But then Saddam had not salted his troops with RG henchmen that would shoot them if they didn't fight.

So in my opinion this pause is very benificial for our troops in Iraq. That former CNN journalist can go pound sand you know where.

36 posted on 03/30/2003 6:59:36 AM PST by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolutionsOnly
Peter Arnett doesn't need a gun to his head to propagandize against America! He's quite happy to do it voluntarily.

Arnett to Iraqi's, "Oh, you don't have to hold that gun to my head, let me do it." (Don't nobody move of the reporter get's it.)

37 posted on 03/30/2003 7:07:56 AM PST by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I would not weep if old Peter happened to choke on his baby milk.
38 posted on 03/30/2003 7:22:18 AM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

39 posted on 03/30/2003 7:43:46 AM PST by ALS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Why anyone would continue to employ Arnett in any journalistic capacity is beyond me.
40 posted on 03/30/2003 7:48:58 AM PST by rogers21774
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-210 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson