Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-War Organizers May Face Fines (SF)
Oakland KTVU Channel 2 ^ | 03/26/03 | KTVU

Posted on 03/26/2003 10:58:06 AM PST by jiggyboy

SAN FRANCISCO -- A San Francisco supervisor said Wednesday that the district attorney's office may issue fines against the organizers of last week's anti-war protests that resulted in over 2,000 arrests and millions of dollars being paid for police overtime and for other city services.

Supervisor Tony Hall said the city was "fed up" with mass 'direct action' demonstrations like the ones last week that brought business to a near halt in downtown San Francisco.

"I think there is no question about it, people on all sides of the war are really fed up with people coming into our city and using the good nature of St. Francis against us," Hall said. "They are causing up to $900,000 a day costs -- in arrests, stopping business, breaking windows, stopping seniors from crossing the street -- it doesn't fly anymore."

Hall said he had talked with District Attorney Terence Hallinan about trying to recoup some of the costs of the protests.

"I've talked with the D.A., who assured me he is going to issue tickets or something to get a fine out of them (the organizers)," Hall said. "I'm not after the innocent protester looking to express himself. I'm after the guy who is literally intend on shutting down business in San Francisco and hurting other people...Stopping other people from expressing their rights."

"We have to get the message out to them -- we are not going to tolerate behavior that is going to step on other people's rights. They can protest in a lawful manner, that's wonderful."

"I also think the organizers of these protests that result in cost to the city, they should be asked to pick up part of these costs just like anybody else who needs a permit to (stage a) parade or demonstrate for what they want. They (the anti-war protesters) should do the same thing."

While Hall and other officials have asked that Hallinan send a strong message to the demonstrators, the D.A. seemingly has done just the opposite. Much to the displeasure of the SFPD, only 12 protesters were facing felony charges. More than 2,000 others have been fined $97 and released.

"I'm a little disappointed in the district attorney's decision -- I hope he reconsiders," Assistant Police Chief Alex Fagan complained to the San Francisco Chronicle. "We booked over 2,000 people -- we were very cautious in deciding which cases were felonies."

Hallinan told KTVU on Wednesday that his department was walking a thin line.

"Our policy is we respect people's First Amendment rights," Hallinan said. "I'm proud to be in a city that respects dissent and the right of people to speak out. But you do have to obey the law. We intend to follow through on these cases."

Meanwhile, the protest movement changed direction on Wednesday from a direct, confrontational approach to an informational campaign.

"Today, we are going to be in the streets of San Francisco, the East Bay, all parts of the Bay Area and we are calling it a day of mass non-violent direct outreach," said David Solnit of Direct Action To Stop The War.

"We have tens of thousands of flyers and hundreds of people have downloaded them. We are leafleting people, engaging in dialogue. We are trying to engage with our community members."

Meanwhile, members of 'Critical Mass' -- an bicyclist-based activist group -- discounted reports on Tuesday that the group had joined the anti-war movement. Rocco Pendola, a member of 'Critical Mass,' said the group's only agenda is to protect cyclists' rights on Bay Area streets.

"It's like having 'Monday Night Football' on Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday," Pendola said of the reports. "Critical Mass' is the last Friday of every month....The common bond is that we ride our bikes together. Most people believe cyclists deserve space on the road with automobiles and they have different viewpoints (on other issues) expressed by a real diverse group of people. I'm sure a lot of people who are going to be riding on Friday support President Bush while others think the war is a joke."

Copyright 2003 by KTVU.com. All rights reserved.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: answer; antiwar; california; protest; protesters; protestors; rallies; rally; sf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: FITZ
Yeah. Way too low. Use RICO and level huge fines.
21 posted on 03/26/2003 11:46:16 AM PST by jwalburg (Just so you know, we're ashamed the Senate minority leader of the United States is from South Dakota)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973
Don't hold your breath. The illustrious District Attorney of SF is a commie sympathizer himself.

You don't know how right you are. In a profile on Hallinan shortly after the election that he eventually won in a runoff, there was a photo of Hallinan in his office at home. Standing out in the background was that infamous poster of Che Guevara.

22 posted on 03/26/2003 12:14:23 PM PST by L.N. Smithee (If you are what you eat, what does that make vegetarians?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy; All
I think those Communist groups need to be investigated from head to toe. Here's something I didn't know until a couple of days ago-one of THE instigators of all this, the SF-IMC, gets partial funding from Bill Moyers.


http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/horowitz.html
23 posted on 03/26/2003 12:20:58 PM PST by JoJo Gunn (Help control the Leftist population. Have them spayed or neutered....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy
It's more likely that the SF Supervisors would try again to implement a commuter tax. Make the non-resident workers pick up the tab.
24 posted on 03/26/2003 12:42:39 PM PST by BRO68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thatsnotnice
"And the DA subsequently dropped the felony charges according to earlier radio news and an article posted here."

communities getting what they voted for. . .

Personally, given the huge cost these people are putting against entire communities; they should be required to leave a 'security deposit' beforehand.

They behave; they get it back; they disrupt citizens, businesses et al; leave a huge mess. . .they do not.

25 posted on 03/26/2003 1:20:24 PM PST by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy
I was going to say how about long jail sentences also, but I don't think any of these losers ever work.
26 posted on 03/26/2003 2:21:17 PM PST by LaGrone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy
Enough of this crap about America having a "great tradition of civil disobedience." There is nothing great about allowing groups of people to destroy private or public property or to disrupt 100s of businesses.
27 posted on 03/26/2003 2:58:45 PM PST by Sally II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy
BUMP! Let these "retreads" rot in jail for a month!
28 posted on 03/26/2003 3:41:31 PM PST by HighRoadToChina (Never Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy
Start with ANSWER and Ramsey Clark. Saddam has paid him to be his legal counsel.
29 posted on 03/26/2003 3:45:47 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy
So why aren't these hoodlums being charged with the RICO statutes? They are organized, they are blocking entrances, they are conspiring to commit crimes...shall I go on?
30 posted on 03/26/2003 5:44:07 PM PST by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy
San Francisco is a rats' nest of traitors that richly deserves to be shut down.
31 posted on 03/26/2003 5:46:23 PM PST by friendly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pfflier
ANSWER and Ramsey Clark...Saddam has paid him to be his legal counsel.

An astonishing charge, meriting jail time for Clark if he actually were an unregistered foreign agent of an enemy state. Any proof of this treason?

32 posted on 03/26/2003 5:48:59 PM PST by friendly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: friendly
Try these sites:

Ramsey Clark: An American Traitor Newsmax.com ^ | March 4th, 2003 | Adam Sparks

President Saddam Hussein Receives Ramsy Clark (official Iraqi take on it) urulink ^

Ramsey Clark: A voice of reason Al Ahram ^ | 2-6-03 | Gamal Nkrumah

THE MYSTERIOUS RAMSEY CLARK: STALINIST DUPE OR RULING-CLASS SPOOK? The Shadow ^ | Manny Goldstein

33 posted on 03/26/2003 6:14:19 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: pfflier
Why the evil Ramsey Clark is not indicted can only be a legacy of the Clintonized Justice Department and the corrupt American lawyer industry.
34 posted on 03/26/2003 7:40:09 PM PST by friendly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: friendly
It is our job to remember the disloyalty and outright treason was itnessed by hollywierd and most of the street scum.

It is apparent, even to the San Francisco city council, that ANSWER's solution is the demise of the American way of life. SF just got a preview of what the eco-socialists have in mind for all of us.

35 posted on 03/26/2003 8:49:55 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: pfflier
ANSWER is little more than the modern core of the evil democrat party.
36 posted on 03/27/2003 5:52:52 AM PST by friendly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson