Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam's 'double' trouble Opposition leader claims Hussein died of cancer in '99
World Net Daily ^ | 3-26-03

Posted on 03/25/2003 11:04:46 PM PST by hope

The Bush administration has concluded the U.S.-led "decapitation" attack failed to take out Saddam Hussein, but an Iraqi opposition leader claims a higher authority already got the job done.

Moslem al-Asadi, a doctor living in exile in Iran, said he believes the real Saddam died in 1999 from cancer.

"The real Saddam died because he had cancer of the lymph nodes, and since his death in 1999 they're just showing his doubles," he told the Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera.

In a plot reminiscent of the Hollywood tale of a body double subbing for an incapacitated American president titled "Dave," al-Asadi claims Saddam's sons, his first wife and Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz run a scheme to keep the truth under wraps using three doubles. Al-Asadi alleges Saddam's younger son, Qusay, actually holds presidential authority.

The absence of live messages by the Iraqi leader since coalition airstrikes crushed the residential compound, in which he was believed to be with his sons, has fueled speculation of his demise.

Hours after the initial attack, Saddam appeared on state-run television, wearing a beret and his reading glasses, and read from a prepared text urging Iraqis to resist the invaders and draw their swords.


Saddam Hussein giving televised speech

"The criminal little Bush has committed a crime against humanity," Hussein said. "Let the arrogance be debased. Long live Iraq, long live jihad, long live Palestine."

Days later, Iraqi state television showed footage of him chairing meetings with top officials.

But U.S. and British intelligence suspected the footage was prerecorded prior to the attacks.

As WorldNetDaily reported, British intelligence in Cheltenham intercepted an urgent call Saturday suggesting that Saddam is still alive in a secret hideaway in Baghdad but required medical intervention the Iraqis could not provide.

"They said he was not critically injured but demanded urgent treatment because he had lost blood and could get worse. This regime wouldn't go to that trouble for anybody else – including members of his family," an official told the British daily The Sun.

Yesterday, Saddam again appeared on Iraqi television giving a speech and meeting with Qusay.

He referred to his "brave and heroic people" and referenced commanders and their locations, including the port of Umm Qasr, taken by coalition forces amid stiff Iraqi resistance.

Despite the reference to Umm Qasr, British intelligence thought the broadcast may have been prerecorded.

"We are well aware that he spent many hours recently tape-recording various messages. We have to do a little more analysis of what he was actually saying to see whether or not that in fact was Saddam Hussein," British Defense Minister Geoff Hoon told reporters.

White House spokesman Ari Fleischer echoed the suspicion.

"I think there are some doubts about whether that tape is canned or whether it's fresh and based on recent events. It would not be a surprise if Saddam Hussein had some time ago put in the can numerous statements designed to be released later," he said.

But the Washington Post reported that because Hussein seemed assured and so much his old self, dressed in a military uniform, the CIA decided it didn't have to analyze the voice to confirm his identity, and senior Bush administration officials believe the message was taped after Thursday's attack.

"The voice is easy to simulate and doubles constantly study video and audio records," argued al-Asadi.

The exile maintains the footage purported to be Saddam Hussein provides the evidence to support his claim that look-alikes are all that remains of the dictator.

Specifically, he asserts Saddam had big, oval ears but one of the doubles' ears do not match Saddam's, which had a special bend. Al-Asadi also said Saddam has an overbite, but one of the doubles doesn't have such a defect. While Saddam has wide and strong shoulders, those of two doubles are narrow and almost sloping. Saddam had big hands, said al-Asadi, while one of doubles has small hands. Lastly, a second long finger of one of the doubles doesn't match that of the real thing.

Corriere della Sera reports the testimony of former doubles corroborates al-Asadi's thesis.

Longtime bodyguard Saddam Michael Ramadan in 1979 wrote in the book "In Saddam's shadow" that the Iraqi leader was so ill he was dependent on pain killers, according to the newspaper. Ramadan is reportedly now under the protection of the CIA.

The paper quotes another former bodyguard, who fled Iraq for Israel two months ago as declaring, "Saddam whom you now see, was photographed some years ago."

Previous stories:

SOS to Moscow to save Saddam?

Fate of Saddam remains mystery

Saddam's missiles fly toward troops


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: decapitation; double; moslemalasadi; saddam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: Dajjal
Lemme guess the real Saddam has 666 and he is the whore king of babylon that God hates, tattooed to his ear
21 posted on 03/26/2003 12:48:51 AM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: hope
Actually, the idea of Sadddammnnn having died of cancer would be very consistent with a puzzling Bible Code cryptically indicating something like that.

Interesting. People have been trying to fit it in as a prediction though it sort of sounded like a done deal, as best as I can recall.
22 posted on 03/26/2003 1:46:34 AM PST by Quix (QUALITY RESRCH STDY BTWN BK WAR N PEACE VS BIBLE RE BIBLE CODES AT MAR BIBLECODESDIGEST.COM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henchster
That is hilarious!
23 posted on 03/26/2003 6:27:31 AM PST by hope (The left and the terrorist have united in one accord and Anti-Americanism is born)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hope
Kill 'em all, we'll sort the DNA LATER.
24 posted on 03/26/2003 6:33:32 AM PST by small voice in the wilderness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope
Makes as much sense as any other explanation.
25 posted on 03/26/2003 6:34:44 AM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henchster
ROFLMAO!
26 posted on 03/26/2003 6:47:49 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BossLady
The Walrus is Saddam...
27 posted on 03/26/2003 6:48:28 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stinkypew
This reminds me of The Dread Pirate Roberts from the Princess' Bride.

You rang?


28 posted on 03/26/2003 6:49:44 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hope
I'm having a bad feeling that the fate of SH is going to be talked about in the future as much as the fate of OBL. Very frustrating.
29 posted on 03/26/2003 6:53:27 AM PST by shattered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: small voice in the wilderness
roger...over and out.
30 posted on 03/26/2003 7:04:14 AM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: small voice in the wilderness
"Kill 'em all, we'll sort the DNA LATER."

The other day I heard a reporter say we had no DNA of Saddam Hussien.

I guess they didn't hear Saddam had pints and pints of his blood drawn and he then had the whole Quran written in his blood.

31 posted on 03/26/2003 7:23:12 AM PST by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: hope
I don't understand why this is not be researched by the TV, radio and print media.

Where are the bloodhounds story finders?
32 posted on 03/26/2003 11:25:31 AM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henchster
Great Work!
33 posted on 03/26/2003 1:59:17 PM PST by Feiny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ukbird
Maybe it wasn't the real Dan Rather either. Something to ponder.
34 posted on 03/26/2003 2:16:17 PM PST by Cate ((LET FREEDOM RING!!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: feinswinesuksass
If you read the fine print on the side, you'll see it's another of Registered's masterpieces, not mine. I WISH I could claim it, it's brilliant.
35 posted on 03/26/2003 3:51:54 PM PST by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
True, about the Koran written in blood, but what if he just pretended to do this, and it's actually someone else's blood?
36 posted on 03/26/2003 3:52:34 PM PST by LPStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sonofatpatcher2; MadIvan
'E's not dead...'e's resting.
37 posted on 03/26/2003 3:55:36 PM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
That is such a cheesy movie, but it is one of the ones I love to watch the most because it gets me rolling on the floor with laughter, which sometimes I need....:)
38 posted on 03/26/2003 3:55:48 PM PST by rwfromkansas (Soli Deo Gloria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hope
I do remember a rumor going around a few years ago that some folks over in there in that region of the world believed he was either dead or close to death. So i wouldn't be too surprised now if that rumor had been true and also if it turns out that it was just one of Saddam's doubles that was killed in the first strike.
39 posted on 03/26/2003 4:03:33 PM PST by Humbug (i haven't the foggiest idea what to type here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
"Where are the bloodhounds story finders?"

Busy trying to be stars. Actually, this story is plausible. I read in an article dated 2001 I believe it was attesting to Saddam having been diagnosed with lymph cancer.

40 posted on 03/26/2003 4:05:48 PM PST by sweetliberty ("To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson