Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tech pioneer Adam Osborne dies at age 64
SJ Mercury News ^ | 3/25/03 | Reuters

Posted on 03/25/2003 9:04:01 PM PST by NormsRevenge

Edited on 04/13/2004 3:30:46 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Adam Osborne, whose successes and failures pioneering the first portable computer became one of Silicon Valley's great cautionary tales, has died at 64 after a long illness.

Osborne, a British immigrant and long-time Berkeley resident, died in his sleep in Kodiakanal, a village in southern India, last Tuesday, his sister, Katya Douglas, told Reuters on Monday.


(Excerpt) Read more at bayarea.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; US: California
KEYWORDS: adamosborne; obituary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 03/25/2003 9:04:01 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I wanted one of those Osborne computers soooo bad. I would go down to the computer store and look through the manuals and admire it. Never got one.
2 posted on 03/25/2003 9:05:35 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
CP/M lives!
3 posted on 03/25/2003 9:09:07 PM PST by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
...that caused him to suffer an endless series of mini-strokes.

I think they ended.

Not trying to be glib about the guy's death, but I couldn't resist pointing out the logical flaw in a report about a man's death which calls his illness endless.

4 posted on 03/25/2003 9:09:43 PM PST by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spruce

Look at that cute little screen. What a piece of tech.
5 posted on 03/25/2003 9:12:48 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
Wow! That take me back. Is that yours? Does it boot?
6 posted on 03/25/2003 9:17:10 PM PST by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Spruce
Wow! That take me back. Is that yours? Does it boot?

No, I just drooled over them, never could afford one at the time. This one is from the Internet Obsolete Computer Museum. You should check it out, it has nearly all of the old machines pictured.
7 posted on 03/25/2003 9:18:56 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Kaypro II lugable was my first computer. Looked a lot like that Osborne, except the screen was bigger.

Had one of those keyboard covers with the format commands for WordStar like that one too.

Two floppy drives (what's a "hard" drive?), for discs that really were floppy. One drive for your file disk, one for the program...

32 lbs. of CP/M processing power.
8 posted on 03/25/2003 9:23:54 PM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
That machine is the first "luggable' ever. Worth a fortune(if it boots).
9 posted on 03/25/2003 9:26:43 PM PST by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All
Osborne. 64. How appropriate.
10 posted on 03/25/2003 9:29:26 PM PST by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
Kaypro II lugable was my first computer.

I hated the Kaypro. It killed the Osborne dead when they put a thermal type printer on the back of it.
11 posted on 03/25/2003 9:30:28 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
Kaypro II lugable was my first computer. Looked a lot like that Osborne, except the screen was bigger.

My first computer was an original Compaq Portable with two floppies, 256K RAM, Compaq DOS 1.11, and WordStar 3.3. It still works, but is not worth using.

12 posted on 03/25/2003 9:31:07 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Time to bomb Saddam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
I remember the 5 1/4 floppy drives. Until I got one of those I had to load programs by a tape deck
13 posted on 03/25/2003 9:31:56 PM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
God I just realize how old I am.

My first machine was an APPLE // clone a LASER // with 64 megs of ram. I quickly dumped it when the APPLE //C came out.

At grad school we were using a DEC VAX 100 mini mainframe to run stats and simulations.

It seems like yesterday.

14 posted on 03/25/2003 9:40:30 PM PST by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
My first machine was an APPLE // clone a LASER // with 64 megs of ram.

I'm sure you meant to say 64 KB of RAM. A megabyte of RAM would have been incredibly expensive back then.

Back when I was using my Apple ][, we were also installing some 4 meg memory modules in an IBM 4341 (a small mainframe) - it was the most expensive thing I've ever held in my hands.

15 posted on 03/25/2003 10:13:01 PM PST by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Thanks, Adam.

I've still got my Osborne Executive and cut my teeth on an Osborne 1 my Dad had. My Exec (with a 10mb hard drive I installed myself) still boots and runs fine - I can't believe I started two businesses with that thing and it changed the direction of my life.

I met the man several times as a Bay Area Osborne dealer just a few miles from the factory ("Liked it so well I started the company", or something like that) during the period of attempted rebuilding. An interesting, pioneering kinda guy. Pre-announcing the Executive (I still have the magazine that article appeared in) was fatal; who knows where he'd have gone without that blunder?

Thanks again, Adam. Those were fun times.

16 posted on 03/25/2003 10:20:14 PM PST by Hank Rearden (Dick Gephardt. Before he dicks you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Correct, I meant 64K, the APPLE //+ came with 32K and could be boosted to 64k, the //e hadn't come out yet. The //e could be boosted to 128K and shortly thereafter the portable //c came out with a standard 128K.

We have been thinking in megs for so long now that it's hard to imagine there were computers out there with miniscule (by today's standards) memory. The commodore 64 was the best selling model in those days and for people on a budget there was the Timex Sinclair with a masssive 16K of memory.

17 posted on 03/25/2003 10:51:04 PM PST by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
Had a girlfriend who went to work for Osborne. Got to play with one of the first ones. But all that up/down back & forth scrolling. Was like looking though a peephole.

18 posted on 03/25/2003 10:58:04 PM PST by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: quietolong
Had a girlfriend who went to work for Osborne. Got to play with one of the first ones. But all that up/down back & forth scrolling. Was like looking though a peephole.

Analogous to the first-generation mechanical scan TV. You got to look into a little 2" square magnifying glass at a neon orange image with 60 to 120 lines of vertical resolution.

Hmm.. a bit like looking at a realvideo feed today.

(^B[>

19 posted on 03/25/2003 11:12:11 PM PST by Erasmus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Erasmus
Hmm.. a bit like looking at a realvideo feed today

Your right !

http://www.tvdawn.com/recordng.htm

http://www.mztv.com/televisor.html
20 posted on 03/26/2003 12:25:58 AM PST by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson