Skip to comments.
WILL WE FORGIVE A TRAITOR, TO BE "POLITICALLY CORRECT?
North East Georgia Internet News ^
| 3-25-03
| Dave Nelson
Posted on 03/25/2003 7:33:39 PM PST by Engine82
LOYALTY AND TRUST
.THE TRUE MARKS OF A SOLDIER
Chris Seifert, 27, a Captain in the 101st Airborne Division was killed early Sunday morning in Kuwait. The Associated Press reported that fifteen other soldiers were injured, three seriously, by a surprise attack within the compound.
At first, it was suspected that local Iraqi sympathizers were responsible. It turned out to be much worse. One of the 101sts own, Sgt. Asan Akbar (his adopted Muslim name), was later identified as the probable attacker.
According to AP, an army spokesman was quoted as saying that Akbar had been "having what you might call an attitude problem." The spokesman said that, if found guilty, Sgt. Akbar would be returned to Fort Campbell, Ky., home of the 101st, "for judicial punishment."
There is much divisiveness in our nation today, much like Viet Nam. Large numbers of anti-war protesters clog our streets, giving psychological support to our enemies and weakening our militarys efforts in the field.
We had, and still have, very strong doubts about the administrations motives and methods in Iraq; nevertheless, now that we are engaged, nothing short of total support for our troops is the only course left for Americans, both in and out of uniform.
We felt the same about the Viet Nam War, which we remember well. This nation cannot repeat the mistake of treating our military people like dirt. And to allow a traitor within the armed forces to go without swift and sure punishment would be inexcusable.
If the man had an "attitude problem", he should have expressed it in some way other than shooting his comrades in the back. Combat is bad enough without having to look constantly over your shoulder.
Sgt. Akbar made a choice when he joined the VOLUNTEER army and took an oath to defend his country. He made another choice (if found guilty) to break that oath. If he had an "attitude problem", he deserves the ultimate "attitude adjuster"
..a firing squad.
Before you begin to rationalize, temporize, or feel sympathy for, Sgt. Asan Akbar, remember Captain Chris Seifert. He got no "judicial review."
(Ed. Note: On this one, we would like YOUR opinion. What do you think?)
Ó2003 Dave Nelson
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: 101airborn; 101stattack; asanakbar; iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
You may comment at editor@neganews.com
1
posted on
03/25/2003 7:33:39 PM PST
by
Engine82
To: Engine82
Hang the SOB from his neck until he is dead.
2
posted on
03/25/2003 7:34:58 PM PST
by
Spruce
To: Engine82
Let the UMCJ take it's course.
3
posted on
03/25/2003 7:35:54 PM PST
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: Spruce
Second that.
4
posted on
03/25/2003 7:36:40 PM PST
by
Rocko
To: Engine82
There should have been a field court martial held within 48 hours and the bastard should be dead by now.
5
posted on
03/25/2003 7:36:41 PM PST
by
John Valentine
(Writing from downtown Seoul, keeping an eye on the hills to the north.)
To: Spruce
My feelings EXACTLY!
A traitor reaps what he sows!
6
posted on
03/25/2003 7:36:44 PM PST
by
GulfWar1Vet
(Do your American duty ~ Pray for and support the American President and Troops!)
To: Engine82
7
posted on
03/25/2003 7:37:18 PM PST
by
Calpernia
(http://www.politicsandprotest.org/attack.swf)
To: facedown
Since you mentioned it:
809. ART. 90. ASSAULTING OR WILLFULLY DISOBEYING SUPERIOR COMMISSIONED OFFICER.
Any person subject to this chapter who--
(1) strikes his superior commissioned officer or draws or lifts up any weapon or offers any violence against him while he is in the execution of his officer;
or (2) willfully disobeys a lawful command of his superior commissioned officer; shall be punished, if the offense is committed in time of war, by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct, and if the offense is committed at any other time, by such punishment, other than death, as a court-martial may direct
894. ART. 94. MUTINY OR SEDITION
(a) Any person subject to this chapter who--
(1) with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority, refuses, in concert with any other person, to obey orders or otherwise do his duty or creates any violence or disturbance is guilty of mutiny;
(2) with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority, creates, in concert with any other person, revolt, violence, or disturbance against that authority is guilty of sedition;
(3) fails to do his utmost to prevent and suppress a mutiny or sedition being committed in his presence, or fails to take all reasonable means to inform his superior commissioned officer or commanding officer of a mutiny or sedition which he knows or has reason to believe is taking place, is guilty of a failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition.
(b) A person who is found guilty of attempted mutiny, mutiny, sedition, or failure to suppress or report a mutiny or sedition shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court- martial may direct
8
posted on
03/25/2003 7:37:25 PM PST
by
Gamecock
(If you have to be one, BE A BIG RED ONE!)
To: Engine82
Question: "WILL WE FORGIVE A TRAITOR, TO BE "POLITICALLY CORRECT?"
Answer: Yes.
Comment: You wont forgive him. I wont forgive him but with three weeks of media treatment he will be selected as the next Pope.
9
posted on
03/25/2003 7:39:24 PM PST
by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(Further, the statement assumed)
To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
We didnt hang that Taliban kid so i dont think we will with this S.O.B.
To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
Comment: You wont forgive him. I wont forgive him but with three weeks of media treatment he will be selected as the next Pope.
In this case, I don't think it matters one little bit what the media does.
11
posted on
03/25/2003 7:43:23 PM PST
by
Arkinsaw
To: Arkinsaw
I hope your right!
12
posted on
03/25/2003 7:46:32 PM PST
by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(Further, the statement assumed)
To: Engine82
I fear we will treat this in a PC way, just as we did Johnny Jihad, and any other terrorists that this country manages to capture. I suppose defense lawyers and leftist groups are already lining up to explain away the fact that he is the worst kind of traitor. He should be taken care of in the field.
To: YayForTheRight
We wouldn't want to be un-PC and uncaring now. We need to overlook this teensy-weensy error in judgement. He was just frustrated, you know.
I say we send him go back to his unit, and have his buddies welcome him back in whatever fashion they see appropriate.
14
posted on
03/25/2003 7:51:21 PM PST
by
BBT
To: Engine82
Another story posted on FR today said he did not fight in the Gulf War for religious reasons. If he got out of going last time, why did he go this time?
I hope this man gets full punishment for this-death. For some reason, I'm not real confident it will happen...
15
posted on
03/25/2003 7:53:24 PM PST
by
uvular
(It's GO time)
To: Gamecock
Bump for later. Thanks for the code.
16
posted on
03/25/2003 7:55:21 PM PST
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: Spruce
I'm a Christian. I don't rejoice in any man's misery, or death.
I think he should be tried so as to establish for certain whether he is responsible for the crimes of which he is accused.
If he is found guilty, I think he should be offered a chaplain who knows Jesus, who can point him to the redemption, and forgiveness, that can be found in Christ alone.
Then he should be hanged by the neck until dead.
I can't see why any of this should take more than a week or two, a month at the outside.
Dan
Biblical Christianity message board
17
posted on
03/25/2003 7:56:24 PM PST
by
BibChr
(People get the leadership they deserve)
To: John Valentine
There should have been a field court martial held within 48 hours and the bastard should be dead by now. Precisely.
18
posted on
03/25/2003 7:56:33 PM PST
by
Noumenon
(You can evade reality, but you cannot evade the consequences of evading reality - Ayn Rand)
To: Engine82
A firing squad can solve an attitude problem real fast.
19
posted on
03/25/2003 8:02:36 PM PST
by
Pushi
To: John Valentine
I am with you 100%.
20
posted on
03/25/2003 8:03:21 PM PST
by
Pushi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson