Didn't the New York Times tell us this morning that the inhabitants of Basra loved Saddam?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-105 next last
To: TonyInOhio
Lets Roll!
To: TonyInOhio
About time we threw some Shiite at those Saddamites
4 posted on
03/25/2003 9:16:50 AM PST by
rocke031
To: TonyInOhio
Throwing the Republican Guards a little curveball..could be go time
5 posted on
03/25/2003 9:16:55 AM PST by
ewing
To: TonyInOhio
I'm doin' the funky chicken at my desk!!!
6 posted on
03/25/2003 9:17:09 AM PST by
rudypoot
To: TonyInOhio
great news. Coordination betwwen Shias and Coalition forces Im sure.
7 posted on
03/25/2003 9:17:23 AM PST by
finnman69
To: TonyInOhio
To: TonyInOhio
YES!!
To: TonyInOhio
This is very good news, The end is near for Saddam
13 posted on
03/25/2003 9:18:22 AM PST by
MJY1288
(We're Rolling)
To: TonyInOhio
After reading the other threads about Basra this morning, this is great news!
Give 'em hell, Brits!
To: TonyInOhio
This is great news for Allied Forces and very bad news for the Saddam regime.
To: TonyInOhio
Ooooppsss
The BBC got it wrong
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/875095/posts Basra: Why they are not cheering
BBC ^ | 3/25/2003 | Paul Reynolds
Posted on 03/25/2003 11:51 AM EST by a_Turk
They were supposed to be cheering in the streets as the American and British tanks rolled in, just as they did in France in 1944.
On 18 March, the New York Times reported: "Military and allied officials familiar with the planning of the upcoming campaign say they hope that a successful and 'benign' occupation of Basra that results in flag-waving crowds hugging British and American soldiers will create an immediate and positive image worldwide while also undermining Iraqi resistance elsewhere."
The fact is that Basra is not undergoing a benign occupation. It has just been declared a military target by British forces which have come under attack from inside.
This was a city which the British spokesman Colonel Chris Vernon said early on was not of military importance.
In the scheme of things, it still isn't. But it has become a problem.
To: TonyInOhio; hchutch
SADDAM: ALL YOUR SHI'A ARE BELONG TO US NOW
23 posted on
03/25/2003 9:19:24 AM PST by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
To: TonyInOhio
WAIT! Shi'ites are still Muslims, so we have to kill them after this, right?
Oh, and we also need to kill all the Muslims that have been helping us in Afghanistan, don't we?
24 posted on
03/25/2003 9:19:27 AM PST by
Illbay
(Don't believe every tagline you read - including this one)
To: TonyInOhio
As someone pointed out yesterday, President Bush has a higher approval rating in Basra than in San Francisco.
To: TonyInOhio
GREAT NEWS!
28 posted on
03/25/2003 9:19:58 AM PST by
ladtx
("...the very obsession of your public service must be Duty, Honor, Country." D. MacArthur)
To: TonyInOhio
PRAY, PRAY, PRAY!
To: TonyInOhio
YAHOOOOOOOO
30 posted on
03/25/2003 9:20:09 AM PST by
PianoMan
(Liberate the Axis of Evil)
To: TonyInOhio
Hehe
34 posted on
03/25/2003 9:20:37 AM PST by
grimalkin
(Foresight is knowing when to shut your mouth before someone suggests it.)
To: TonyInOhio
Looks like our SF boys and the Iraqi expatriates have convinced the local Shiites to pick up arms and fight. This is a dress rehearsal for Baghdad IMO.
36 posted on
03/25/2003 9:20:42 AM PST by
TADSLOS
(Sua Sponte)
To: TonyInOhio
Great news. This means that the Shia feel confident that Saddam is history now and trust us to see this thing out to the bitter end. These brave folk will be richly rewarded.
I guess the brutal Fedayeen could only bully people for so long.
37 posted on
03/25/2003 9:20:43 AM PST by
randita
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-105 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson