Skip to comments.
PROTESTS: (Overseas) "Anti-US" / (Domestic US): "Anti-War"....What Gives? (They are the same)
AmericanInTokyo ^
| 24 March 2003
| AmericanInTokyo
Posted on 03/24/2003 6:17:15 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo
Some random thoughts here for consideration.The US media is aggressively covering the various demonstrations taking place which call an end to the War on Iraq by the Bush Administration.
I have examined in detail both the websites of these various groups in the US and overseas as I have analyzed the speeches that are given, in terms of rhetorical comment.
I have taken a good look at the posters and rally slogans also in these various gatherings.
And here is the question:
US media highlights these demonstrations, when they occur internationally, as being "ANTI-AMERICAN".
And yet, when they occur in the United States they are called "ANTI-WAR".
But what gives? For all intents and purposes, the 'ESSENCE' of these gatherings is the same everywhere. There is no distingushing objectives, messages, speakers, intents, platforms, and in my cases, cross-border alliances between groups.
So why do we not insist that the USA media 'call a spade a spade' and refer to these various demonstrations within the United States terrority, for the sake of uniformity, as being:
ANTI - AMERICAN
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 5thcolumn; answer; antiamericanism; antibush; antius; iraq; sedition; traitors; war
Any additional thoughts?
My prior training in logic and semantics was tickling my brain on this the other day.
To: AmericanInTokyo
I concur whole-heartily. They both are anti-American, and even more specifically anti-Bush. If Clinton were running this war, which of course would have never happened, the crowds would be significantly less or perhaps non-existent at all.
To: AmericanInTokyo
bump for later
3
posted on
03/24/2003 6:45:48 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Defend America against her most powerful enemy -- the Democrats.)
To: AmericanInTokyo
4
posted on
03/24/2003 6:47:45 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(http://www.politicsandprotest.org/attack.swf)
To: TLBSHOW
Ping
5
posted on
03/24/2003 6:51:56 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(http://www.politicsandprotest.org/attack.swf)
To: AmericanInTokyo
There are no two ways about it! It has been an orchestrated effort and I know exactly who is behind it. This last ditch effort by what remains of the Clinton organization will also fail and the people he controls who are responsible for the current attempt divide the American people will be exposed for who they are!
Message to Bill and Hillary Clinton: Kiss my ass.
6
posted on
03/24/2003 6:57:57 AM PST
by
fightu4it
(allyourbasearebelongtous!)
To: AmericanInTokyo
another thought is they are all communist protesters and that is a fact!
7
posted on
03/24/2003 7:00:12 AM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(The gift is to see the truth......)
To: TLBSHOW
At least funded and educated by communist sources. Majority of the protestors are pathologic and angry....ready to act out on anything angry and hateful.
8
posted on
03/24/2003 7:02:51 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(http://www.politicsandprotest.org/attack.swf)
To: Calpernia
Majority of the protestors are pathologic and angry.
oh you mean liberal democrats? LOL
9
posted on
03/24/2003 7:08:49 AM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(The gift is to see the truth......)
To: Calpernia
ping
10
posted on
03/24/2003 7:09:19 AM PST
by
fightu4it
(allyourbasearebelongtous!)
To: AmericanInTokyo
Finally, someone points this out. Yes, our fellow citizens are agreeing with, use the same rhetoric as anti-american countries. Yes, the protesters who do that are anti-american. It's just that simple (at least for me).
Here's a thought for you. Notice how all of the "non-biased" media defends the protester when called "anti-american" by people like Rush. I wish Rush or Hannity would point out that none of the "non-biased" media have ever defended a conservative against the title "nazis" or "fascist".
11
posted on
03/24/2003 7:16:15 AM PST
by
techcor
To: techcor
bump
12
posted on
03/24/2003 7:21:24 AM PST
by
aimhigh
To: TLBSHOW
They do exhibit very commitable behavior :)
A break with reality
Hallucinations
Delusions
Disorganized speech and thinking
Psychosis
Negative Symptoms
blunted affect
decreased motivation and self care
Hallucinations
False sensory experiences
auditory
visual
somatic
olfactory
gustatory
Illusions
Misinterpretation of stimulus
Delusions
Fixed false belief
persecutory
grandeur
jealousy
somatic
bizarre
Psychosis
A symptom
Non specific to any particular disorder
A wide differential
medical / neurological
drugs of abuse
psychiatric disorders
factitious disorder/ malingering
Psychosis
Medical
delirium (esp. withdrawal states)
endocrine/ metobolic
hypercalcimia
medications
digitalis
Neurological
Alzheimer's
seizure disorder
Drugs of Abuse
alcohol (withdrawal)
Hallucinogens
LSD
marijuana
Stimulants
methamphetamine
Diagnosis:
Liberal Democrat....huh, you are right TLBSHOW...Now we know :)
13
posted on
03/24/2003 7:22:26 AM PST
by
Calpernia
(http://www.politicsandprotest.org/attack.swf)
To: Calpernia
Now we know :)
Are you trying to start a flame war so early in the day?
:>)
14
posted on
03/24/2003 7:26:49 AM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(The gift is to see the truth......)
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: TLBSHOW
The ringleaders are the same nuts who arganized the WTO protests 3 years ago. These are people who need to be protesting something in order to socialize. It's quite sad really. The ranks are augumented by position-less zombies who go because it's an "event." Look at them on TV sometime. They have no conviction.
17
posted on
03/24/2003 9:24:11 AM PST
by
WaveThatFlag
(Republicans For Sharpton)
To: Discussted
Horowitz has chronicled these pr*cks pretty well at FrontPage
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson