Skip to comments.
BLIX: SCUDS A "VIOLATION"
New York Post ^
| 3/21/03
| ROBERT HARDT Jr.
Posted on 03/21/2003 2:10:07 AM PST by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:12:45 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
1
posted on
03/21/2003 2:10:07 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Hey!! Somebody woke him up!!!!
2
posted on
03/21/2003 2:10:53 AM PST
by
The Raven
To: The Raven
Or someone went to a 7-11 & got him a case of 'Clue"...
To: kattracks
"I could not guarantee that we would come to clear conclusions even after some months more," he said. This is the line that needs to be broadcast repeatedly worldwide.
To: The Raven
CYA time for this puke and Kofi "pious fraud" Annan.
5
posted on
03/21/2003 2:14:49 AM PST
by
dennisw
To: kattracks
Gotta save this one.
To: kattracks
Amazing how war can clear peoples' minds.
7
posted on
03/21/2003 2:19:12 AM PST
by
Mr. Mojo
To: dennisw
—"I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on here"—
8
posted on
03/21/2003 2:20:12 AM PST
by
ambrose
To: kattracks
Does "Blix" mean dumbarse in some other language?
9
posted on
03/21/2003 2:20:56 AM PST
by
wattsmag2
To: wattsmag2
DUH!!!
To: kattracks
It only took a scud to wake the damn fool up.
UN = Equal opportunity for all idiots
We don't need to subside idiocy.
11
posted on
03/21/2003 2:30:33 AM PST
by
Caipirabob
(Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
To: kattracks
This is the tip of the iceberg. We're going to be hearing a lot more "oh yeah, he's been in violation all along".
To: kattracks
Thanks for the news flash, Hans.
To: kattracks
"If they're firing [Scuds], of course that shows that there's a violation," Inspector Clouseau has no ......awww fahget about it
14
posted on
03/21/2003 2:37:51 AM PST
by
Bad~Rodeo
(Kick the Tires and Light the Fires)
To: kattracks
Thank you, Captain Obvious.
Bork bork bork.
}:-)4
15
posted on
03/21/2003 2:41:33 AM PST
by
Moose4
(Let's do the Tomahawk chop! OooooOOOOoooo *BOOM*)
To: kattracks
"If they were to use chemicals or any prohibited weapon, then the whole world opinion, I think, would turn against them immediately," he said.
Gee, just yesterday he was saying that he is not in the speculation business. Of course, they were asking him to speculate something bad about Iraq then.
16
posted on
03/21/2003 2:41:34 AM PST
by
William McKinley
(You're so vain, you probably think this tagline's about you)
To: The Raven
17
posted on
03/21/2003 2:42:27 AM PST
by
JustPiper
(Anti-War Protestors Are The Terrorist's Bodyguard!!!)
To: kattracks
Nothin' gets by ol' Blixie, does it?
18
posted on
03/21/2003 2:42:46 AM PST
by
Redcloak
(All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
To: kattracks
Well isn't that sweet of him. He took a break from being in a bumbling haze long enough to acknowledge some truth. For a change.
Regards, Ivan
19
posted on
03/21/2003 2:43:00 AM PST
by
MadIvan
(Learn the power of the Dark Side, www.thedarkside.net)
To: kattracks
The government of Sweden should kill this stupid bastard, before he embarrasses them any more than he has already...
Blix will enter the dictionary in much the same way as Lewinsky has.....except Blix will be a synonym for "Feckless Imbecile"...
Damn I love that term....it says everything about the swarmy bastard...
Semper Fi
20
posted on
03/21/2003 2:44:11 AM PST
by
river rat
(War works......It brings Peace... Give war a chance to destroy Jihadists...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
