Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kattracks
This is the tip of the iceberg. We're going to be hearing a lot more "oh yeah, he's been in violation all along".
12 posted on 03/21/2003 2:31:19 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: samtheman
Probably, but am I the only one who is a bit perplexed that Saddam hasn't used some rougher stuff yet? (and happily surprised, of course!)

A thought hit me about this while listening to peacenik whiners yesterday on the news. Those of you on DU and other sites should get them all shouting about how Saddam hasn't used any WMD's, and that's proof that he can be trsuted with them, that we didn't need to go to war, and that they probably don't even exist. This creates a good situation for us, since, if they are not used, our troops are much better off (as well as many innocent people), and if they are used or found, the Lefties get stuck looking even more apologetic for and supportive of Saddam (and even more ridiculous, as if that were possible). Heck, if the message goes global quickly enough, it could even influence Iraq to not use them at all, looking to score the diplomatic victory, since the military one is not in the cards.

30 posted on 03/21/2003 3:23:01 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson