Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. John Edwards Skips Vote on Partial-Birth Abortion
NORTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY | March 13, 2003 | Jonathan C. Jordan

Posted on 03/13/2003 1:42:56 PM PST by defeat_the_dem_igods

Edwards Skips Vote on Partial-Birth Abortion

Edwards Termed Procedure "Gruesome" and Called for a Ban During Election, But in Office Continues to Oppose a Ban or Duck the Issue

(RALEIGH) - The U.S. Senate voted overwhelmingly today to ban partial-birth abortion in a lopsided bipartisan vote of 64-33, a triumph for President Bush and Republicans, but Senator John Edwards (D-NC), despite his previous claims to support a ban on the abhorrent procedure, has voted against it before and skipped today's vote.

"Once again, John Edwards proves himself to be out of step with North Carolinians and on the far-left fringe of his party. He claims to support a ban on this horrific abortion procedure, but is on the record voting against a ban and now is missing in action. Unfortunately, North Carolinians are getting used to Edwards being anywhere except where he was elected to be - working for North Carolina's interests," said Bill Cobey, Chairman of the North Carolina Republican Party.

Edwards Called It "Gruesome," But Voted Against Banning the Procedure in 1999 and Skipped Today's Vote.

During the 1998 Senate Campaign, Senator John Edwards (D-NC) said partial-birth abortion should be banned: "I think partial-birth abortions should be banned,' Edwards said. 'These are terribly gruesome procedures. I think the only exception is where there is a grave, serious threat to the health of the mother.'" ("Edwards Campaigns On An Issue A Week," The Associated Press, 9/19/98)

A CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll conducted January 2003 found 70 percent of those surveyed said that it should be illegal to perform "a specific abortion procedure conducted in the last 6 months of pregnancy known as a 'partial birth abortion,' except in cases necessary to save the life of the mother." (CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll, Conducted 1/10-12; Surveyed 1,002 Adults; Margin Of Error +/- 3%, Released January 15, 2003, As Quoted In National Journal's Hotline, 1/15/03)

But Edwards Has Now Voted Twice Against Banning Partial-Birth Abortion. (S. 1692, Roll Call Vote #340, Passed 63-34: R 49-3; D 14-31, 10/21/99)

"Once again, liberal trial lawyer John Edwards speaks one way at one time, and a different way at another time," said Bill Cobey, Chairman of the North Carolina Republican Party.

John Edwards thinks all it takes to keep in touch with "mainstream North Carolinians" is an area code, so you can reach his Washington, D.C.-based campaign at North Carolina area code (919) 785-1900. Of course, he will probably be out traveling in Hollywood, New Hampshire, or Iowa, so we wish you the best of luck. Email contact info for Edwards can be found at http://www.senate.gov/~edwards/mailform.html.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: johnedwards; pbabanvote2003

1 posted on 03/13/2003 1:42:56 PM PST by defeat_the_dem_igods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: defeat_the_dem_igods
Since he didn't state and we don't know his position on PBA, I think it only fair that he not take part in a fillabuster blocking confirmation of Estrada...
2 posted on 03/13/2003 1:47:58 PM PST by danneskjold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danneskjold
Bet anything that those three that abstained did not want to be on record for providing the SUPER MAJORITY VOTE (67) necessary for a vote on a constitutional amendment, should it become necessary in the future.
3 posted on 03/13/2003 1:51:06 PM PST by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: defeat_the_dem_igods
Apparently, Mr. Kerry skipped the vote too. Raising money much more important than infanticide.
4 posted on 03/13/2003 1:54:59 PM PST by Darth Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: defeat_the_dem_igods

Left wing, lawyer, loser

5 posted on 03/13/2003 1:57:05 PM PST by bert (Don't Panic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: defeat_the_dem_igods
Must have heard a siren and went to check to see if anyone needed help an attorney.
6 posted on 03/13/2003 2:02:15 PM PST by husky ed (FOX NEWS ALERT "Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead" THIS HAS BEEN A FOX NEWS ALERT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

from opensecrets.org

John Edwards (D-NC)
Senator John Edwards (D-NC)

Contributions by Sector  

Summary Data
Geographic Totals
Sector Totals
Top Industries
Top Contributors

 

defeat_the_dem_igods

7 posted on 03/13/2003 2:02:50 PM PST by defeat_the_dem_igods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: defeat_the_dem_igods
Hey, this is just a "regular" guy, with a NON-VOTE on a bill that has considerable meaning to his (soon-to-be-former) constituents. What a spineless weasel!
8 posted on 03/13/2003 2:03:59 PM PST by TommyDale (It's time to take a stand, folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert
I think LIBERAL is appropriate also....
Seems like the rats really raised a fuss when that label was pinned on them...
9 posted on 03/13/2003 2:08:18 PM PST by missnry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: missnry
Opie gets funier by the day. It is amazing how a dope like opie edwards could have gotten elected in the first place.
10 posted on 03/13/2003 2:42:42 PM PST by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: defeat_the_dem_igods
A profile in cowardice!

Edwards was able to get to the Senate floor yesterday in order to vote "yea" on a pointless "Sense of the Senate" resolution affirming vague support for the Roe v. Wade verdict of eons ago (that vote, of course, was designed to give political cover to the pro-abortionists who might vote against PBA), but found it impossible to get to the floor to vote on the question itself.

The reason is, I think, self-evident. A "yea" vote on the ban of PBA would doom him in the far-left Iowa Caucus; a "nay" vote would doom him in his home state, should he abandon his Presidential quest and file for re-election to his Senate seat.

There will be more such situations, where a vote which might please primary voters or caucus participants in liberal states would be deadly in North Carolina. Clearly, the Senator has a prominent yellow streak down his back. I'd actually prefer a "nay" vote to the abject weaselness indicated by "not voting." I trust the NCGOP and voters in North Carolina will hold his feet to the fire.

John Edwards is a coward.

11 posted on 03/13/2003 2:49:05 PM PST by southernnorthcarolina (optional tag line, printed after my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: defeat_the_dem_igods
Edwards is a lightweight and he ain't going anywhere. He's the type that Hillary would pick as a VEEP to make her look more mature.
12 posted on 03/13/2003 2:51:13 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: husky ed
I'd like to see the complete vote. How many Democrat
pretend Catholics voted not to ban Partial Birth Abortion?
13 posted on 03/13/2003 4:40:11 PM PST by SouthCarolinaKit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
.....Kerry skipped the vote too. Raising money
is much more important than infanticide.......

Actually, Kerry is planning to announce he has found his long-lost
Transylvanian twin brother, when they were separated at birth.

14 posted on 03/15/2003 3:48:06 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson