Skip to comments.
DRUDGE JUST ANNOUNCED TERROR ATTACKS PLANNED ON PEARL HARBOR; GERTZ TO BE ON AIR SOON
DRUDGE RADIO ^
| 03/01/03
| DRUDGE
Posted on 03/02/2003 8:29:31 PM PST by RaceBannon
DRUDGE JUST ANNOUNCED TERROR ALERT ON PEARL HARBOR; GERTZ TO BE ON AIR SOON
TOPICS: Announcements; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: Hawaii; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: air; drudge; freedomrocks; gertz; pearlharbor; ronjeremy; shakemohamed; sneak; suprise; terror; terrorist; torturemo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 241-251 next last
To: ConservativeMan55
This the best this guy is gonna look for the next week or so...heh,heh,heh :)
To: Macaw
Hey! It's the Frito Bandito!
To: bonesmccoy
See my #99
To: bonesmccoy
I'll give you one guess...
I'm a loser baby..so why don't you kill me! Name the artist of that song!
To: ConservativeMan55
Gertz is extremely good at twisting and spinning for his own purposes and personal monetary benefit.
Intell is at least as good at "spinning" Gertz.After reading "Breakdown", I would say Intell had used him up, and spat him out a while back.
Symbionic relationship, essentially.Out of the two sides involved, it would appear Gertz claims the crown as a sometimes "usefull idiot".IMHO.
105
posted on
03/02/2003 9:03:00 PM PST
by
sarasmom
(SAC Trained killer.I am more comfortable with nuclear weaponry than Jimmy Carter mentality.)
To: Jay D. Dyson
Our Los Angeles and Seawolf SSNs move faster under water than on the surface. I think it's 25 knots on the surface and 30-35 knots submerged. Same with the Ohio class SSBNs, about 20 knots surfaced, 25-30 knots submerged.
106
posted on
03/02/2003 9:03:07 PM PST
by
xrp
To: ConservativeMan55
Beck?
To: Nita Nuprez
I'm just wondering... Do you ever have anything positive to say about anything? Aren't you the know-it-all guy who is almost as negative as Jim Underscore? Or am I thinking about some other "John" with initials in his name?
No, it's me. And I am a know-it-all.
I mostly have negative things to say because making positive comments bores me. I mean, I believe Clinton is a scumball, for example, but I have no interest in simply wandering around FR, and when someone posts "Clinton is a scumball!", then posting "YEAH! You're right!"
To: Hazzardgate
DING DING DING!!!! You are our instant winner tonight! You get to
To: John H K
heck, I believe an AEGIS radar is actually a health hazard if it's on and you're near itUhm...these things aren't remote-controlled. Aegis ships have crew -- what happens to them when the Aegis system is up and running?
110
posted on
03/02/2003 9:04:34 PM PST
by
xrp
To: Pan_Yans Wife
In the water, submerged, I think they could outrun an airplane,...Care to restate that?
111
posted on
03/02/2003 9:06:15 PM PST
by
Illbay
To: ConservativeMan55
112
posted on
03/02/2003 9:06:31 PM PST
by
Jhoffa_
(Jhoffa_X)
To: TrappedInLiberalHell
An attack on Pearl Harbor would be just the thing to rally the nation behind Bush's Iraq plans. Heck, it worked for Roosevelt, why not for Bush?
To: Howlin
Kurtz sees the handwriting on the wall with the ratings,and knows full well it is because of the bias. He has made a concerted effort, to try to correct this, in his columns,
and on his program. He is still a lefty!!
To: xrp
Uhm...these things aren't remote-controlled. Aegis ships have crew -- what happens to them when the Aegis system is up and running?
They don't spend much time standing in front of the transmitting panels.
Anyway, point is, they don't have the radars on while they're in port, and as others have noted, much of the crew won't even be on the ship in a port like Pearl.
To: woodyinscc; StarFan
116
posted on
03/02/2003 9:07:36 PM PST
by
Howlin
(q)
To: John H K
Ramzi Yousef and his Uncle Shake Mohamed!
To: Pan_Yans Wife
Nuke sub outrun an aircraft?! Huh?
Nuke subs can move darn fast when they have to, but not even close to the stall speed (the slowest speed that a plane's wing will provide adequate lift to keep it from falling) for most aircraft.
Also a sub's hull is pretty tough. I doubt even a 747 would do much damage to most nuke subs hulls. Aluminum against many inches of harden steel - my bet is on the sub.
Also Pearl has some significant defenses and a controlled airspace. There are other targets there of higher vulnerability and significance than subs. I'm sure that such an attack is not unexpected for CINCPAC. The Navy has a long memory when it comes to such attacks.
To: Macaw; sit-rep
ROTFLMBO......Freddy Fenders ugly Sister ?
Stay Safe !
119
posted on
03/02/2003 9:08:54 PM PST
by
Squantos
(Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
To: Illbay
HUMOR... really, you should try it!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 241-251 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson