Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives, off their leash, are a frightening bunch (The Economist's view of CPAC)
Economist ^ | 2/6/03 | Correspondent

Posted on 02/08/2003 8:19:16 AM PST by P.O.E.

The right, unrestrained

Guys and dolls

Feb 6th 2003 | WASHINGTON, DC
From The Economist print edition

Conservatives, off their leash, are a frightening bunch

Do you wish that George Bush would quit pussyfooting around with the United Nations and simply march into Baghdad? Do you regard the recent tax cuts as nothing more than a prelude to the biggest chop of all, the abolition of the income tax? Do you wish that America would unleash Ariel Sharon?

You are not alone. Last weekend more than 4,000 conservative activists—1,700 of them college students—gathered in Arlington, Virginia, for the 30th annual meeting of the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), the biggest audience the organisation has ever attracted. The delegates were pumped up and ready to do battle. They brimmed with hatred at the dastardly liberal establishment: grasping bureaucrats who want to steal your money; liberal professors who want to indoctrinate the young with “black Marxism” and teach them “how to be gay”; peaceniks who want to undermine the nation's will to defend itself. And they positively glowed with pleasure at the thought of another Republican victory in 2004.

Delegates crammed into a huge hall to hear Dick Cheney, Katherine Harris and other conservative heroes speak from a stage draped in red, white and blue and backed by 18 American flags. They listened to speeches on “Islam: religion of peace?”, “Myths, lies and terror: the growing threat of radical environmentalism” and “Hollywood needs adult supervision”. They wore “Fry Mumia” T-shirts (referring to a cop-killer who, for some reason, has become a cause célèbre for the left); held up posters saying “Give war a chance: peace through superior firepower”; sold badges saying “Fight crime—shoot back”; and purchased “Wipe out Saddam” lavatory paper. The Traditional Values Coalition offered the chance to fling beanbags at grotesque trolls called “Saddam Hussein”, “Hillary Clinton”, “the liberal media” and “the homosexual agenda”.

That said, for many fresh-faced men there was one love that dared speak its name. The exhibition hall was a temple of Bushophilia, from photographs of his inauguration for $175 to cups, hats, badges, key-rings and “Pray for him” T-shirts. You could even buy talking George Bush dolls that repeat his classic lines, such as, “We will not allow our enemies to hold our nation hostile.” With their hero on their pillow, the young right will spare nothing to keep him in the White House in 2004.

But love for Mr Bush has not blotted out their hatred for his predecessor. Anti-Clinton memorabilia was almost as popular as the pro-Bush sort. One of the most visited exhibits was for the Counter-Clinton Library. The proposed institution will be within walking distance of the Clinton Library in Little Rock, Arkansas, and will try to tell the story of the Clinton years as conservatives see it. Exhibits will include the Hillary Hall of Shame, the Clinton Casualties, the Grifters' Gallery and the Department of Domestic “Affairs”. The exit foyers will remind people how the Clintonites trashed the White House when they left. Dick Erickson, the man who thought up the counter-library, says that several people, including Dick Morris and Gary Aldrich, have already promised to donate material to it, and that money is flooding in from anti-Clinton activists.

Two other figures dominated the conference: Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein. Arab fanaticism now plays the same role for conservatives that Communism played until the fall of the Berlin Wall: it justifies both a vigorous foreign policy abroad and an ever-vigilant approach to potential subversives at home.

One activist stopped selling his “No Muslims = No terrorism” stickers when the vice-president's office complained. But there was no shortage of anti-Islamic ware: T-shirts mocking the idea that Islam is a religion of peace, mugs hinting that Islam is a new form of Nazism. A company called Decisive Action, proclaiming its devotion to “our conservative Judeo-Christian heritage”, sold water purifiers and body armour. “The police have it; the military have it; and now you have it.”

CPAC no doubt regarded the conference as a triumph. But surely the organisation missed one trick. Why hold the conference in Virginia, where conservatism is in the drinking water and liberal-baiting a sport? Next year, try Paris.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: cpac; thesocialist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last
The Economist has drifted so far to the left over the last 10 years, it's getting irksome. I suppose they suffer from journalistic groupthink when it comes to politics. If it wasn't for the fact the magazine has articles on events you can't easily find in one place in the western press (e.g., in Africa, Asia, on technology, economic theory, etc.), I'd nix my subscription

ANYway, I'm awfully proud of the showing you folks put up at CPAC, and I guess it must be having an impact for the international press to be making such a fuss.

1 posted on 02/08/2003 8:19:16 AM PST by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
CPAC sounds less frightening than a NARAL conference.
2 posted on 02/08/2003 8:22:04 AM PST by syriacus (Those who attempt to cool the earth would bring freezing death to the poor and homeless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
The left is so far left they are Anti-Americans
3 posted on 02/08/2003 8:22:29 AM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
Sounds like this poor writer's tender sensibilities have been wounded by just being at CPAC.

Perhaps he needs to visit with some nice socialists, for council. Maybe the Ba'th Socialist Party.

Q: What's the difference between nationalist socialists and internationalist socialists?
A: Internationalist socialists conspire openly.

This chap is so liberal, he things France is conservative.
4 posted on 02/08/2003 8:29:28 AM PST by unspun (The most terrorized place in America is a mother's womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
Clear the calendar freepers! Next year WE DOUBLE the attendance! PS: Where can I get the "No Muslims=No Terrorism" stickers? (Ann Coulter)???
5 posted on 02/08/2003 8:31:37 AM PST by jaz.357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
" The exit foyers will remind people how the Clintonites trashed the White House when they left. "

How unAmerican of these conservatives.

6 posted on 02/08/2003 8:32:50 AM PST by unspun (The most terrorized place in America is a mother's womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
Actually, this was a pretty nice article. After you get past the opening lines and the title, it is fairly accurate. The funny part is, most Americans would think there is nothing wrong with most of was done at CPAC. It is hysterical to think of the liberal left being terrified and upset by "Fight crime, shoot back!" t-shirts. I think I would like a bumper sticker that says that for my car....
7 posted on 02/08/2003 8:33:27 AM PST by I still care
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
Do you wish that George Bush would quit pussyfooting around with the United Nations and simply march into Baghdad?

Yes.

Do you regard the recent tax cuts as nothing more than a prelude to the biggest chop of all, the abolition of the income tax?

Yes!

Do you wish that America would unleash Ariel Sharon?

YES!

You are not alone.

YES!! YES!!

So what's the problem?!

8 posted on 02/08/2003 8:34:11 AM PST by wizardoz (panting, fists clenched, eyes blazing with psychotic conservative fervor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
This is interesting... the leftist press generally ignores CPAC. Suddenly this year we see a number of hit pieces trying to paint the convention as an assembly of wild-eyed loons thirsting for blood, and whining about its malign effect on young impressionable minds.

Sounds like progress to me.

9 posted on 02/08/2003 8:35:31 AM PST by Interesting Times (Avoid global cooling -- cruise the Caribbean on Freeps Ahoy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
...draped in red, white and blue and backed by 18 American flags!... *GASP*NOOOOOOOOOOOOO
10 posted on 02/08/2003 8:37:13 AM PST by jaz.357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
Why hold the conference in Virginia, where conservatism is in the drinking water and liberal-baiting a sport? Next year, try Paris.

Why? Do the French need another spanking? We'll send Rummy, don't get excited.

11 posted on 02/08/2003 8:37:23 AM PST by geedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
" Two other figures dominated the conference: Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein. Arab fanaticism now plays the same role for conservatives that Communism played until the fall of the Berlin Wall: "

Funny how that wall just fell down, all of a sudden.

" ...it justifies both a vigorous foreign policy abroad and an ever-vigilant approach to potential subversives at home. "

Such extreme notions. Afterall, those towers in New York city were garish displays of capitalism (and those in it were just capitalists).

12 posted on 02/08/2003 8:37:45 AM PST by unspun (The most terrorized place in America is a mother's womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I still care
Bump.
13 posted on 02/08/2003 8:37:51 AM PST by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
Arab fanaticism now plays the same role for conservatives that Communism played until the fall of the Berlin Wall: it justifies both a vigorous foreign policy abroad and an ever-vigilant approach to potential subversives at home.

Is he saying that Communism wasn't a real threat?

Is saying that Radical Islam is just a made-up enemy of American Freedom?

Is he saying that a vigorous foreign policy abroad and vigilance at home are BAD things?

The Economist has really gone over to the Dark Side on this "reporting".

14 posted on 02/08/2003 8:38:30 AM PST by RobFromGa (Space Is The Final Frontier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wizardoz
Bump.
15 posted on 02/08/2003 8:38:31 AM PST by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
If this clown thinks conservatives are frightening, he must have missed the Paul Wellstone Circus and Sideshow.
16 posted on 02/08/2003 8:38:45 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
The truth can be frightening for some.
17 posted on 02/08/2003 8:39:32 AM PST by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I still care
>>After you get past the opening lines and the title, it is fairly accurate<<

One would think that The Economist, although a lefty rag, would at least have enough guts to match the headline to the text.

There was nothing specifically "frightening" pointed out in article -- the author never even says "they took the frightening position that..." (probably even HE couldn't do that honestly).

It was a nice summary of our thinking -- the Left will have to deal with it.

18 posted on 02/08/2003 8:40:12 AM PST by freedumb2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sultan88; Mudboy Slim
Why hold the conference in Virginia, where conservatism is in the drinking water and liberal-baiting a sport?

And here I thought it was just the arsenic that W was poisoning me with.

19 posted on 02/08/2003 8:40:41 AM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
The Right, unrestrained.

Right on!!!

I wonder if the people at The Economist have forgotten that the opposite of Right is Wrong?
20 posted on 02/08/2003 8:42:14 AM PST by Aarchaeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson