Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/28/2003 5:05:12 PM PST by PierreEsbaillart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: PierreEsbaillart

Your country is the charter member to the Axis of Weasels.

Now go away or I will taunt you a second time ;)

31 posted on 01/28/2003 5:17:34 PM PST by Centurion2000 (The meek shall inherit the Earth. The stars belong to the bold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
Irak has not yet attacked anyone

Oh? Kuwait and Iran may have a different view on the subject.

Here we have French rationalisation at its worst. Iraq was obliged to disarm as a result of the Gulf War, a war in which Iraq invaded Kuwait. For 12 years it has failed to live up to its obligations.

Here are some things you cannot deny: not only has Iraq failed to live up to its obligation to disarm, it sponsors terrorism, hosting Abu Nidal, no less, and paying the families of suicide bombers in Israel, $25,000 each.

Worse, Iraq was implicated in a plot to kill former President Bush, and even Blix is saying now that it has not declared all its weapons of mass destruction, which according to the UN, it is obligated to do.

Some crusade. This is the culmination of years of violations, lying, brutality and sponsorship of terrorism. I dare say even Chirac realises that Saddam is a bad person.

But realising this is one thing. Actually stepping up to take the action to remove Saddam is another.

J'ACCUSE!

I accuse France of moral cowardice in light of this, not only in refusing to fight, but trying to impede those who would do the right thing.

J'ACCUSE!

I accuse France of complicity in trying to preserve this brutal regime, trying to put up endless delaying tactics, ensuring Saddam's survival.

J'ACCUSE!

I accuse France of being a thoroughly immoral country because not only are you behaving immorally, you dare to lecture Britain and the United States on the subject of morality.

What Britain and the United States require of France is not aid, nor troops, nor money, nor even your affection. Just do that which is the hardest for you. Remain silent for once.

Ivan

32 posted on 01/28/2003 5:18:56 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
Vive le vin California!
33 posted on 01/28/2003 5:19:18 PM PST by clintonh8r (It's better to be feared than to be respected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
And the rest of the world fears you but it doesn't love you.

Do you think they love you Frenchmen? Don't believe it.

34 posted on 01/28/2003 5:20:37 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
If socialized healthcare was all its supposed to be, this poor man would have gotten the medication he so desparately needs to live a normal life. As it is, I can't decide whether it's the schizophrenia or the syphillis talking.

FReegards,
Slings and Arrows

35 posted on 01/28/2003 5:21:04 PM PST by Slings and Arrows (A conservative's dream: Scott Ritter signs up as a human shield.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Looks to me like the Frenchman ran away and surrendered yet again. Not one response on this thread from the Frenchman...
36 posted on 01/28/2003 5:21:28 PM PST by go star go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
I've finished my Big Mac and I've moved on to eating French Fries now. If the French had a collective spine, that term, French Fries, would be offensive. But since they're unimportant weasels, I don't care.

Aren't you late for a surrender someplace?
37 posted on 01/28/2003 5:21:54 PM PST by Redcloak (Tag, you're it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

I would be glad if the French didn't participate in the upcoming war. Primarily because I want the investigation into who is supplying Iraq with materials for making nuclear, biological and chemical weapons unfettered by the French, German and Russian interference. The last thing we need is the French 102nd paper shredder division jumping to the head to the march into Baghdad in the last day of the war.
38 posted on 01/28/2003 5:22:55 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Tagline.txt not found. Abort, Retry, Fail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
My God, Pierre. It is the time for the civilized cultures to stand against the uncivilized, and this means in large part Islam. You say countries only go to war in their own interests. You believe the lie that it is lust for oil. Americans don't send their young ones off for lucre, but for peace and freedom. Sometimes you can't have peace without war. If you are familiar with history, you know this. So what is France's self interest that keeps it out of this conflict. Economic deals with the Butcher of Bagdad? And for Schroeder, the desire to keep his power. I love France, les francais et les francaise, l'histoire, la literature. Chirac, je ne l'aime pas. Zoot, not Zot.
39 posted on 01/28/2003 5:23:59 PM PST by Bahbah (vive GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
The next time Germany invades your country, ask the Iraqis to save you. It's times like this when nations determine who their true allies are. France and Germany have spoken, and many of us won't forget.
40 posted on 01/28/2003 5:24:39 PM PST by holdonnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
Here it is, plain and simple. We have tolerated 'terrorism' because we have tolerated the notion of plausible deniability, that is, that sponsor states can reap the benefit of a covert war while denying their role in its existence, support, and furtherance. It is-was the only way for the weak -- the world of disaffected Islam -- to confront the strong (US).

But September 11th -- and the transition to power of the conservatives, who will not condone the self-deception and status-quo groveling cowardice that allows such plausible deniabilty to operate -- means that that world is over.

Saddam is the first in our cross-hairs, because he is bound by the treaty of surrender, which is a contract that we intend to enforce. Others may follow, if and as necessary. IMHO, it will not be necessary -- they will soon learn an instructive lesson.

42 posted on 01/28/2003 5:25:21 PM PST by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
Here's a few questions for you:

Why did France refuse the US permission for overflight during the bombing of Libya?

What kind of involvement has France had with Iraq since the end of the Gulf War?

How much money does Iraq owe France and French countries?

Is that why you're standing with Germany?

Oh - and how do you feel about owing the US for the blood spilled to gain your freedom twice in the past century??

It's ok, I don't expect an answer.
47 posted on 01/28/2003 5:26:52 PM PST by Tennessee_Bob (Beat my guest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
What did the Mayor of Paris say to the German Army as they entered during WWII?

Table for One Hundred Thousand?.

49 posted on 01/28/2003 5:28:04 PM PST by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
The Maginot Line was the equivalent of using cheesecloth as a condom.
52 posted on 01/28/2003 5:29:55 PM PST by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
Come on back out and fight, Pierre. Don't worry about your English. It's not that bad. My French is not so great either but I don't let it stop me.
54 posted on 01/28/2003 5:30:12 PM PST by Bahbah (vive GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart

58 posted on 01/28/2003 5:33:24 PM PST by El Sordo (Just a hobo among the trains of thought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
Anglo-Saxon Crusade? (this IS 2003)

Oil Pipelines? (France, Germany and Russia HAVE oil contracts to protect with Iraq)

Thousands of new terrorists that hate America? (Muslims have been preaching hate for decades, that's new?)

So we should attack, NK, Russia, China, Israel (I'm sure you would join the fight against those awful Jews), and Palestine, (when they have their own terrorist state, for sure).

USA wants to be loved? No that's France, lovers of all lovers. Millions come to the USA to WORK, W-O-R-K, do the French have a word for work?

Conspiracy tales are Frances' notion of "rational"?



60 posted on 01/28/2003 5:34:39 PM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
NATO (OTAN) was founded to defend its members against the Soviet Union--before the Warsaw Pact (le Pacte de Varsovie) existed. The French preference is for appeasement and doing nothing, like they did when Hitler invaded Poland and the French went through the motions of declaring war and then did nothing for more than half a year, until Hitler attacked them.

The later kings of the Merovingian dynasty were known as the "do-nothing kings." The Fifth Republic seems to have entered its Merovingian stage.

65 posted on 01/28/2003 5:41:05 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
France is a dog hole, and it no more merits the tread of a man's foot.

- William Shakespeare, All's Well That Ends Well

66 posted on 01/28/2003 5:41:45 PM PST by Gamecock (The friendship of the French is like their wine, exquisite, but of short duration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
Let me apologize for all these irrational freepers. Sometimes anonymity of the internet brings out the worst of manners.

My daughter married a Frenchman last summer in SW France in the Lot vallee. We enjoyed small-town life in France immensely. People were very friendly and helpful. My daughter #3 is spending a year there now, perfecting her French.

Nonetheless, I have to say that I share a certain impatience with the French govt lately, I sincerely wonder if the government has even read UN res 1441. The burden has been clearly upon Saddam to demonstrate the manner in which his WMD were destroyed. When Blix said today, "this is not a game of 'catch-as-catch-can,'" I couldn't help but think he was speaking directly to the Elysee. Powell carefully, meticulously, crafted the language of 1441 with the active colaborration of the French. For them now to pretend they don't understand is, indeed, infuriating.

But it won't keep me from visiting France this summer, I can hardly wait!

67 posted on 01/28/2003 5:43:01 PM PST by cookcounty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson