FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD
Posted on 01/13/2003 7:45:49 AM PST by BOBTHENAILER
WASHINGTON, Jan 10 (Reuters) - The Bush administration on Friday gave the green light to more coalbed methane drilling in Wyoming's Powder River Basin, saying its studies showed that the process of squeezing natural gas out of coal deposits would not harm the environment.
In two environmental impact studies that support President George W. Bush's plan to boost energy exploration in the west, the Bureau of Land Management said impact to water, soil and wildlife in the region would be "minor."
The BLM, in an about-face from its earlier draft, proposed storing salty water used to extract natural gas in small reservoirs. The plan would prevent water from flowing into streams and rivers used for farming and drinking.
"This provides a framework that will allow us to move forward with development of a new, clean energy source while actively protecting the environment," said Jim Hughes, a BLM director.
But green groups criticized the change and said the Bureau of Land Management was doing "a minimal amount" to comply with federal laws to protect the environment while catering to big energy companies.
Coalbed methane is a form of natural gas trapped beneath coal reserves and held in place by water pressure. Drilling is relatively cheap and attractive to the industry because large amounts of coal are accessible at shallow depths.
Environmental groups contend that when the gas is removed from coalbed deposits, sodium from the large volumes of water produced flows into streams, harming cattle and local residents.
The agency studies said the Powder River Basin could contain as much as 43 trillion cubic feet of recoverable coalbed methane reserves, a significant increase from earlier estimates that pegged reserves at about 30 Tcf.
The United States consumes about 22 Tcf of natural gas a year.
Coalbed methane wells have soared in recent years. About 11,000 now exist, up from only a few hundred in the early 1990s, according to the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission.
The agency estimated thousands more could be added during the next decade, including some 51,000 in the Wyoming portion of the Powder River Basin.
Powder River is worked by Marathon Oil Corp. (nyse: MRO - news - people) and hundreds of other small coalbed developers.
The region has been the target of a series of lawsuits in recent months by environmental groups who argue that nearly 5,000 leases lack the proper environmental studies to proceed.
Last April, the Interior Department's own board of land appeals ruled that three leases issued by the Bureau of Land Management during the Clinton administration were illegal because they did not conduct sufficient environmental analysis.
"SMOKE AND MIRRORS"
Towards that end, the Environmental Protection Agency warned last year that earlier Bureau of Land Management environmental draft impact studies in the region were flawed because they used old data and failed to address the impact of coalbed methane on local water.
The Bureau of Land Management has instead proposed the use of nearly 3,000 surface reservoirs to collect water used to remove the coalbed methane from the ground rather than releasing it into streams.
Environmental groups said the study does not adequately gauge the impact of the reservoirs and whether they could leak into the area water supply.
Tom Darin, a lawyer with the Wyoming Outdoor Council, said the proposed measure to reduce water runoff is the administration's way of doing a "minimal" amount of work to comply with the National Environmental Protection Act.
"This is a smoke and mirrors game (by the administration)," said Darin.
"It's effort is guided by two principles: ramping up oil and gas production at all costs on public lands in the west and doing so with effort to allow projects to go forward that are most favorable to industry."
A spokeswoman with the Bureau of Land Management in Wyoming said the agency worked closely with the U.S. Forest Service and EPA, among other groups, to address all environmental laws.
The studies, which will be published in the Federal Register on Jan. 17, will be open to public comment for 30 days.
For all those who want to know the MILLIONS of dollars wasted to satisfy ENVIRO/NAZIS, check out what constitutes an EIS and the sh!t we in the industry have to put up with.
http://www.prb-eis.org/prb-feis.htm
Yadda, Yadda, Yadda!
Enviro speak perfectly translated.
I imagine it varies from site to site.
I would like to see actual data on the degree of salinity.
If it truly was fresh, it would be better to release it rather than store it where evaporation would guarantee an unacceptable build-up of salt concentration.
BTW, depending on whether EPA or the state has Clean Water Act jurisdiction in Wyoming, putting this under the CWA (and thereby requiring a federal NPDES permit) could effectively end production. There is a general EPA NPDES permit for oil and gas produced water in effect for the states which has a "no discharge" requirement to "waters of the US". I don't know whether the permit could be modified for discharge of coalbed methane water. However, in Region 6 in NM most of the water is reinjected or evaporated, both because of poorer water quality and because the program is under EPA in Dallas which doesn't have the staff to process the permits!
I would say they are catering to energy users, which most likely includes the anthrophobic greens.
That's the point. They are tired of the libs whining about federal assistance to pay high heating bills.
Many producers would love to have the PRB water problem.
It's been awhile since I've played in the Powder, but the discharge permits were definitely a hindrance. As I recall, the issuance was faster in the areas aroung Gillette where the water was purest. I have no doubts that the enviro groups will ramp up the scare tactics to continue their efforts to slow or stop the drilling.
Love your tagline...Permian or Delaware?
Thanks to you, my friend. One day, will we win this war for Energy Independence.
Will this hurt Yellowstone?
Calpowercrisis:
| To find all articles tagged or indexed using Calpowercrisis, click below: | ||||
| click here >>> | Calpowercrisis | <<< click here | ||
| (To view all FR Bump Lists, click here) | ||||
What does that mean?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.