Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog Gone; Grampa Dave; madfly; All
You're exactly correct. In some circumstances the coal bed water is fresher than the above acquifers, but that doesn't make for good scare tactics.

For all those who want to know the MILLIONS of dollars wasted to satisfy ENVIRO/NAZIS, check out what constitutes an EIS and the sh!t we in the industry have to put up with.

http://www.prb-eis.org/prb-feis.htm

6 posted on 01/13/2003 8:06:48 AM PST by BOBTHENAILER (Bush/Cheney in 04, plus nine "Right" senators more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: BOBTHENAILER
Here in SE NM we would love to have water of that quality!

BTW, depending on whether EPA or the state has Clean Water Act jurisdiction in Wyoming, putting this under the CWA (and thereby requiring a federal NPDES permit) could effectively end production. There is a general EPA NPDES permit for oil and gas produced water in effect for the states which has a "no discharge" requirement to "waters of the US". I don't know whether the permit could be modified for discharge of coalbed methane water. However, in Region 6 in NM most of the water is reinjected or evaporated, both because of poorer water quality and because the program is under EPA in Dallas which doesn't have the staff to process the permits!

10 posted on 01/13/2003 9:00:58 AM PST by CedarDave (The SE NM oil patch: where natural resource use is not considered rape of the earth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson