Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BOLD BUSH DID THE RIGHT THING (Lou Dobbs)
The New York Daily News | 1/12/03 | Lou Dobbs

Posted on 01/12/2003 11:14:14 AM PST by Wait4Truth

Bold Bush did the right thing

The boldness of President Bush's economic stimulus plan has been greeted by surprised gasps and unsurprising partisan carping. But given the challenges we now face, would a less ambitious plan have been appropriate? This economy is caught in an atypical recovery following an atypical recession. The stock market has fallen for three straight years. The weak holiday retail season raised concerns that consumers may finally be curbing their spending. And we're fighting radical Islamist terrorism worldwide and preparing for war against Iraq.

In our times, bold is the best policy option.

But you wouldn't know that from watching the Democrats. Instead of recognizing and responding to the fundamental changes facing our economy and nation, the Democrats have offered up a stimulus lite plan that would maintain the status quo. And they've offered up the same tired arguments in support of their same tired ideas on the economy.

First, they attacked the President for focusing too much on the war against terror and not enough on the economy. As I've written, the two issues are not mutually exclusive. Further terrorist attacks on domestic soil are one of this country's biggest economic threats.

The Brookings Institution estimates a biological attack in a major urban area could cause $750 billion in economic damage. Politics and economics can't be separated.

Then, the Democrats accused Bush of irresponsible spending and deficit creation. However, Robert Reich, Bill Clinton's former labor secretary, recently wrote, "These Democrat deficit hawks have it all wrong. The economy needs a fiscal stimulus right now, which means the federal government has to run large deficits."

Now the Democrats are using the class warfare tactic, the line of attack that successfully sank Bush's father's reelection attempt - a bitter defeat that continues to instruct this President.

However, the core of the Bush package eliminates dividend taxes, which benefits the nearly 70% of voters who invest in the markets and many seniors who rely on dividend income. And the plan targets working families, small businesses and the unemployed.

But Bush's boldness could still backfire.

A debate has already begun over whether the President's plan is less a stimulus package and more a long-term restructuring of the tax system. If it turns out to be the latter, voters may not feel much better about the economy by the time they go to the polls in 2004.

And that leads to what could be the President's biggest challenge. By introducing such an ambitious package, he raised expectations that fiscal policy can stimulate the economy at a time when so many variables still exist, such as a war against Iraq or higher oil prices.

Rumblings from McCain

There's also the problem of Republican unity. Already, Sen. John McCain, who is making a career out of being a malcontent, is rumbling about more middle-class tax relief. While Republicans enjoy a majority in the House and the Senate, that majority is slim and still could splinter.

And Democrats also can look back and learn from the 1992 presidential election cycle. The Democrats' relentless pounding on the economy's problems pushed Bush senior's approval rating down to 29% from 89% in just 17 months, even though the economy was growing.

Democrats will try to work this message again if the Bush plan does not work relatively quickly. Bush needs a stronger recovery between now and Election Day. He's chosen a bold plan to make that happen. But that shouldn't come as a surprise.

Given the challenges facing this economy and the nation, and given the history of the first President Bush - did he really have a choice?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boldplan; bush; dothelou; economy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Interesting opinion from Lou Dobbs. Watch out for traitor McCain, as usual. I keep warning you guys!

LINK TO ARTICLE

1 posted on 01/12/2003 11:14:14 AM PST by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Do you have a ping list for this article? I have to get one of those but I don't know how...can you help me? How do I do it?
2 posted on 01/12/2003 11:15:37 AM PST by Wait4Truth (I HATE THE MEDIA!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
A ping list is simply a list of people who one keeps on a separate file, and when you want to ping them you copy the whole list into the box marked "To:"

Even though they won't all show up when your reply is posted, they are all there and the appropriate people will see the article when they pull up "My Comments."

Just make a list of people you wish to see articles like this, separating each name by a semi-colon. Then whenever you want to flag everyone, you can simply copy the list and paste it in the box, and everyone will be pinged!

3 posted on 01/12/2003 11:20:11 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
There's also the problem of Republican unity. Already, Sen. John McCain, who is making a career out of being a malcontent, is rumbling about more middle-class tax relief. While Republicans enjoy a majority in the House and the Senate, that majority is slim and still could splinter.

Ann Coulter has stated in Slander that ALL Republican Presidents (post WWII) have been crticized as being just plain dumb. Then, about 20 years after they leave ooffice, it's discovered that they weren't so dumb, after all.

Admittedly, McCain isn't a president, nor is he ever likely to be. Yet his pronouncements strike me as being surprisingly "Jocelyn Elder-like." The guy simply isn't very smart. Oh, well. Depite the positive vibes the hit TV show, JAG tries to leave vis a vis the military, I guess not every ex-Navy pilot can be the brightest bulb in the chandelier.

Then, despite the Democrats efforts in 1992, icluding the help from Ross Perot, Bush would not have lost if he had not been suckered into the tax increase that broke his most important promise. Despite this amazing Lou Dobbs article, there are one or two wrong conclusions in it.

4 posted on 01/12/2003 11:52:40 AM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Can I save the list in Microsoft Word?
5 posted on 01/12/2003 11:57:56 AM PST by Wait4Truth (I HATE THE MEDIA!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

6 posted on 01/12/2003 11:58:37 AM PST by Mo1 (Join the DC Chapter at the Patriots Rally III on 1/18/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stevem
Dobbs may have gotten a couple of things wrong, but you must admit that it's nice to hear something positive about President Bush by ANYONE that appears daily on CNN!!
7 posted on 01/12/2003 12:00:46 PM PST by Wait4Truth (I HATE THE MEDIA!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
I don't think the smearing of Bush on the economy will work now as it did in 1992. I well remember that election: every night, the news was nothing but one story after another about the "struggling" economy, the hapless President Bush unable to fix it, and the fresh and "charismatic" Bill Clinton campaigning for an improved future. ABC News might as well have been produced by James Carville. But in 2004, the media are far more splintered, with more people getting their news from Fox, Internet, talk radio, etc., and we have Republicans now who will get in their faces and argue back. It will be much harder to lie to the public and get a majority of voters to believe that a growing economy is actually a depression, the way they did in 1992.
8 posted on 01/12/2003 12:07:15 PM PST by HHFi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HHFi; Wait4Truth
Exactly right....and with we have the internet today where information can be gathered & spread at record speed!

Researching is much easier. Also agree that the GOP is more aggressive since algore & company tried to steal Florida. FL Freepers showed them how to stand up to the RATs!
9 posted on 01/12/2003 12:20:00 PM PST by JulieRNR21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stevem
I guess not every ex-Navy pilot can be the brightest bulb in the chandelier.

You don't have to be if Daddy is an admiral.

10 posted on 01/12/2003 12:33:32 PM PST by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HHFi
I don't think the smearing of Bush on the economy will work now as it did in 1992. I well remember that election: every night, the news was nothing but one story after another about the "struggling" economy, the hapless President Bush unable to fix it, and the fresh and "charismatic" Bill Clinton campaigning for an improved future.

Bush 41 lost that election because he made it obvious that he didn't want it. He was totally disengaged.

11 posted on 01/12/2003 12:36:39 PM PST by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21
I agree with you Julie; the "right wing" has much more going for it - in the media, and with the public.

The greatest example I could find was a stat which Rush pointed out - even BEFORE 9/11.

He said that before impeachment 75% of the public thought x42 should stay in office - however, ONLY ONE YEAR LATER, the public had done a reverse (I believe because much more came to light), and that same 75% now believed x42 should have been removed from office.

The public was primed - when 9/11 hit - it was like a magic shift of public opinion - amazing!

THE DEMS STILL DON'T GET IT! That is their basic problem; and the reason, I believe, that they will not get anywhere with the race, economy or any other bashing they try on the Bush admin.
12 posted on 01/12/2003 1:13:54 PM PST by CyberAnt (Syracuse where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
Dobbs may have gotten a couple of things wrong, but you must admit that it's nice to hear something positive about President Bush by ANYONE that appears daily on CNN!!

Lou Dobbs is famously, and very openly, Republican. :)

13 posted on 01/12/2003 1:20:32 PM PST by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
He said that before impeachment 75% of the public thought x42 should stay in office - however, ONLY ONE YEAR LATER, the public had done a reverse (I believe because much more came to light), and that same 75% now believed x42 should have been removed from office. The public was primed - when 9/11 hit - it was like a magic shift of public opinion - amazing!

We are seeing a lot of NY snowbirds in Florida now.....easy to spot their cars....they still have American flags flying from their windows.

9-11 changed everything! I think many Americans are finally aware that while Bill fiddled with Monica (and she fiddled with him) terrorism was spreading like a plague.

Most Americans realize that GWB has inherited that legacy and that he is definitely 'The Right Man' for these perilous times!

14 posted on 01/12/2003 1:32:03 PM PST by JulieRNR21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21
I totally agree with you Julie!!
15 posted on 01/12/2003 1:34:34 PM PST by CyberAnt (Syracuse where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HHFi
It will be much harder to lie to the public and get a majority of voters to believe that a growing economy is actually a depression, the way they did in 1992.

Clinton never got the majority of the vote in either of his Presidential elections, he got a plurality, with the help of Ross Perot.(In fairness GW in 2000 didn't get a majority either, but GW's 48.9% was much higher than Clinton's 43% in 92)

Perot in 92 was there to "help" Clinton, no doubt about it to me. Add in Lawrence Walsh's "October surprise" and infromation being controlled and spun by the mainstream liberal media(i.e talk radio only starting to mature and no internet network available cheaply to the general public), voila, a Presidency that stained the institution of the Presidency, the Bill and Hillary freak show.

16 posted on 01/12/2003 1:36:19 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Ditto. If Clinton was so overwhelmingly popular, as many Dems try to claim, he would've easily gotten a majority of the votes in 96. Instead the little would-be tyrant Perot helped the Slick One into office twice.
17 posted on 01/12/2003 2:18:47 PM PST by driftless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
Sure - you can save it anyway, in any file on your computer, that you know how to edit and to cut+paste from.
18 posted on 01/12/2003 5:30:08 PM PST by ThePythonicCow (Mooo !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
you must admit that it's nice to hear something positive about President Bush by ANYONE that appears daily on CNN!!

Agreed.

19 posted on 01/12/2003 5:39:20 PM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

But what the economy really needs is a Superbowl champ from the NFC.
20 posted on 01/12/2003 7:36:03 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson