Posted on 01/06/2003 9:07:13 AM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs
Edited on 05/07/2004 7:12:51 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Damon Quarker Jr. was curious about the world around him. The toddler liked talking to strangers, learning new words and exploring nooks in his eastside Detroit home.
Store guns in a gun safe, lock box or a locked cabinet or drawer.
Store the gun unloaded, with ammunition locked separately.
(Excerpt) Read more at freep.com ...
Some parents are afraid to be that brutally honest with their kids. Another problem is parents being so afraid/guilty about gun-ownership, that they do not even TELL the kids a weapon is hidden in the house, and fail to teach them the safety basics. Then the kid(s) stumble upon this curious looking "toy". Best to TEACH the kids....most responsible firearm owner/parents spend time with their families on the range and these are the kids that have the advantage of better safety training and the first-hand/eye witness TRUTH that "this is NOT A TOY". My kids, my nieces and nephews all grew up around firearms owned by responsible parents and did not have that dangerous "curiosity", because they were TAUGHT. The weapons were not accessable or LEFT LOADED in the dern house. Sad story, but the truth is: irresponsible parent(s) at fault in this case. God's Mercy on this family.
Handguns are designed to expell a projectile towards an intended target, just like all firearms. The "purpose" of doing so is a function of the operator. It may be to punch holes in paper or tin cans, the only thing mine have ever been used for, or to stop an assailant from harming or killing someone in my family, or, in Texas at least, from committing "Theft during the nighttime".
The gun dropped out of a "box" or a "laundry basket" hit the floor and discharged?
Oh, come on. Let's not sugarcoat this. Handguns are made for killing people, first and foremost. All other purposes are secondary.
If they were not so-intended, there would be no reason for folks to be scolding about how necessary it is to keep them loaded in the house.
Just to be clear: I'm all for RKBA. But I'm not going to pretend it's about something other than maintaining the capability to kill somebody.
More kids die in swimming pools every year. Should swimming pools not be allowed on the same property where kids live????
Do you now get my point?
What do you propose as a punishment that is worse than the one they have meted out to themselves? I'd say the punishment is already in place.
More kids are killed in swimming pools every year. Should swimming pools not be allowed where children live?
BS. I have handguns ranging from .22 cal to .45-70. The .22 cal is for target competition at the range. It is Ok for snakes when loaded with birdshot. It is not very useful for self defense against humans. The 45-70 and .454 Casull are for knocking down bears, elk and deer. They are far too big for self defense against humans. The 9mm, .357 Mag, .38SPL, .45ACP, .40S&W are the preferred defensive rounds against humans. That's why law enforcement uses them. The .25ACP, .32 and .380 auto calibers are a bit small for self defense, and generally inadequate for bullseye target matches due to short sight radius. They do a fine job of convincing a store clerk to part with the contents of the cash register.
What about the lives of young children that are taken by abortions? Are those young lives any less "precious?"
Doctors kill far more children (due to negligence) a year than do guns and that is even if you do NOT include abortions in the equation!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.