Posted on 01/04/2003 12:43:36 AM PST by judicial meanz
A while back, I posted a thread on State Defense Forces and their role in Homeland Security. This is part two of the series.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/798815/posts
A lot of media attention has been devoted to the problem of Illegal immigration along our Northern and Southern Borders. Calls for Federal Troops to be stationed there, the National Guard, and even hiring more Border Patrol Agents.
The Congress and the President seem to ignore the problem while crime escalates in the border regions and our citizens are threatened with serious crimes, as well as the obvious national security concerns.
Private militias have formed to protect citizens, and the problem is still ignored.
My question is: Why is this just a federal only problem? The states have the same authority as the Federal Government to station troops on the borders to stem the flow of illegal aliens, and are neglecting this role just as badly as the Feds are. The only problem is the State Governors arent facing the same heat because people dont know the military laws of their state. ( who could blame them)
Every state has the ability to use its State Militia to patrol the border and interdict illegal aliens. In some cases, they have even more authority.
State Militias are authorized under 32USC 109 of the United States Code.They are usually called "State Defense Forces" because federal statutes refer to them as such. Every state has statutes (under the shared responsibility clause of the Constitution governing military defense) to allow it to use the state militia at the discretion of the governor to do the following:
1) Invasion, insurrection, or threats of either 2) when any combination of person(s) become so powerful as to obstruct the execution of laws 3) WHEN THE GOVERNOR DETERMINES A STATE AGENCY OR AGENCIES HAVING LAW ENFORCEMENT FUNCTIONS ARE IN NEED OF HELP IN PERFORMING THESE FUNCTIONS 4) Disasters 5) Emergencies of lesser magnitude ( as determined by the Governor-this is a catch all) 6) counter-drug duties
As anyone can see, a State Governor would have every justification in the world to call out the State Militia ( State Defense Forces) to secure our borders.
About 26 states have State Defense Forces. SO far, none have state troops detailed to curb illegal immigration or secure our borders from outside threats. They could keep Federal troops free from this duty so they could be used overseas in the impending war.
Why are we letting the states off the hook here? Because no one knows about these laws, or no one cares to know about them.
I suggest we start hounding our state governors and representatives to get on the ball as well as the Feds on this issue.
That symbol is an affront to the sovereignty of this country and tells everything one needs to know about the agenda of these border governors. What I find interesting about that Traitorous Attached Flags Symbol is that it is in a physically "impossible" shape. If you follow each flag towards the center of the symbol both of the flags turn "inside out" to attach to the front of the other flag, though the symbol makes this graphically "ambiguous".
It's really quite fitting as the terms "impossible", "turns inside out" and "ambiguous" describes well what America gets out of a fused relationship with Mexico.
Saw it on another forum from a poster who said it was in Rush's latest newsletter, the rationale apparently used to encouraging the House to write a bill in favor of amnesty has the following quote: "While it's morally wrong and politically unwise...(silence) this is a great war president".
This particular poster is the only source I've heard the news from and have been seeking confirmation of it, but if it is true it definitely looks like there may be some conditioning of the conservative masses being attempted. Big mistake if Rush thinks we can be brainwashed into such a ludicrous idea. He's better off sticking to the Ted Kennedy parodies, that's the only reason why I ever listened to him anyway.
Great Post 4F. You brought up several interesting points. It's no accident the Governors of the Border States are in a fixed orbit with the Open Border Cabal. Both parties studiously screen out any aspiring candidate in their party that believes in a Sovereign America. These candidates never get past GO in the first round. It's why there are so few Tom Tancredos in our government (how did he make it through the gauntlet?).
To date I've focused all of my lobbying efforts on my federal representatives. Yes, that's not enough. In many ways getting involved on the local level, where the rubber meets the road, is a far more productive way to get your voice heard and get things done.
The governors of the border states are hopelessly, pro-open borders, pro-illegal immigration, one (3rd) worlder, Liberal, Democrats or RINOs. That's why the newly legal and fraudulently voting illegal aliens elected them.
Bump That. It's quite telling how the Republicans suddenly dropped their protest of Motor Voter shortly after the Democrats enacted it. Motor Voter is one of the Greatest Acts of Treason our government has ever perpetrated on the American People. Apparently many Republicans are in on the action too. Yeah, Sure, let Illegal Aliens, any kind of non-citizen vote in OUR elections. America is in rapid descent.
I guess nothing has to make sense anymore. Yeah, it looks like our worst fears are about to be realized. Rush is a fool to go along with this. This is going to tear the party apart. Common Sense is totally gone from the political scene.
Count me in. If we can get something organized in the DC area, I'll be there.
Peaceful? Do you think "peaceful" protests actually do anything at all, politically? Do you remember the "million man march"? Do you think the hundreds or thousands of people that show up for anti-war, or anti-globalist protests accomplish anything? They do do not. Yes, they get media coverage. Sometimes they get tear gassed. But no traction. They are not effective. So why do you think you would be effective?
Well, I don't want to just bitch and not offer anything constructive. I have no idea if any of these ideas would work. But. It may behoove some folks with legal training to review the laws on the books to see if it is possible to:
(1) Somehow sue companies that hire illegals. Questions would relate to - do you have the right to sue? What is your "standing"? Areas of interest may be, that you are being harmed by a company that hires illegals just like you would be harmed by a company that pollutes. After all, the presence of illegals in a community can be statistically correlated with a higher crime rate and a higher drain on social services. Thus you may be able to show that you are being "harmed", in that your taxes go up.
(2) Related to the idea of how companies that polluted were dealt with before there were laws on the books banning their actions, it might be useful to see how those companies were sued before there were such laws.
(3) Extra-legal actions. What actions could be done against companies that hire illegals, other than law suits? For example, you might form a group in your town that agrees to punish companies that hire illegals in your community. Raise some money, hire a private detective service for 5 grand or so. Get the documented info - how many illegals, what shifts they work, get photos, etc. Hire a 2nd agency to vet the work of the first so that you don't screw up and "identify" someone as an illegal who is not. Then:
(a) Boycott the companies that hire illegals.
(b) Run full page ads in your local paper, with copies of the documented evidence showing that they are hiring illegals. Ask all the readers to boycott those companies.
(c) Make sure your "group" is incorporated as a nonprofit corporation so that the companies can't effectively try to sue you back as individuals.
Face it - if illegals can't get jobs, they won't come here.
On a side note related to the H-1B issue, you are free to use the database (its been posted a few dozen times) to identify firms that hire H-1B's. You are free to privately make business decisions not to do business with them. Even as an employee of a company -- as long as you make decisions in your own head, you can't be censured for them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.