Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The biggest event to hit the AZ anti-illegal alien invasion movement
Marine Inspector ^ | 12/24/2002 | Marine Inspector

Posted on 12/24/2002 1:50:38 PM PST by Marine Inspector

The biggest event to hit the AZ anti-illegal alien invasion movement is confirmed: Michelle Malkin vs. Ricardo Pimental debate. Here's the scoop:

DATE: Saturday, January 25
TIME: 5:00-6:00 p.m.--Book-signing and Reception.
6:30-8:30--Malkin-Pimental debate.

LOCATION: Steele Auditorium at the Arizona Historical Society Museum (Papago Park):
1300 North College Avenue
Tempe, AZ 85281

MODERATOR: Tentatively U.S. Representative J.D. Hayworth.

Debate topic and question are: "Immigration and National Security in the Post-9/11 Era: Are Open Borders an Invitation to Terrorism?"
Yes, Michelle will sign all books purchased for/at this event.

TICKET PRICES:
$15 General Admission
$35 General Admission + one copy of book INVASION
$30 VIP seating (center aisle, first four rows)
$50 VIP seating + one copy of book INVASION
$25 additional copies of INVASION

Tickets/books go on sale January 2: SONORAN NEWS will accept phone orders for credit card sales, with tickets/books available at Will Call table at the Museum starting at 5 p.m. day of debate. For further information, call Kathy at (623) 376-7918.


TOPICS: Announcements; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: jihadinamerica; whatpriceinvasion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: sneakypete
Wouldn't it be nice if C-span would show this debate? Well, I haven't seen Santa at my house yet, so he can give me that!!
21 posted on 12/24/2002 3:44:07 PM PST by Elkiejg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Mexicans to collect U.S. Social Security?

Talks underway to add some residents south of border to rolls

Posted: December 19, 2002 5:00 p.m. Eastern

By Jon Dougherty

The United States and Mexico are in preliminary talks to merge both countries' Social Security systems under a plan that would add tens of thousands of residents south of the border to the rolls and cost American taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars annually.

Though officials describe the talks so far as "informal," the idea is being pushed by Mexican President Vincente Fox as payback from President Bush for failing to secure major new immigration reforms beneficial to Mexico City, the Washington Post reported today.

Excerpts from a U.S. Social Security Administration memo dated this month say the agreement "is expected to move forward at an accelerated pace," and could be in place by next October.

Both governments are said to be supportive of the plan, though it is being pushed by the Mexican government.

The pact is the latest and largest attempt by Washington and Mexico City to ensure that people from one country working in another aren't taxed twice for Social Security benefits. In the first year alone, the agreement is expected to trigger 37,000 claims from Mexicans working in the U.S. legally who paid Social Security taxes but haven't been able to claim their checks, said the memo, prepared by Ted Girdner, the Social Security Administration's assistant associate commissioner for international operations.

Within five years of implementation, the agreement could cost U.S. taxpayers $750 million, though an independent estimate put the cost at around $1 billion. Currently, $372 billion in Social Security benefits are being paid to 46.4 million recipients.

Mexican officials began pushing the Bush administration hard in October to support the agreement.

"When the legalization talks began going nowhere, the Mexicans began focusing on this," Maria Blanco, national senior counsel for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, told the Post.

Arturo Sarukhan, a top Mexican foreign ministry official, said his government has been lobbying the Bush administration hard after failing to win favorable immigration reforms.

"How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time,"

he said.

He said the agreement would improve the daily lives of Mexican citizens, many of whom are still trapped in poverty a decade after the North American Free Trade Agreement promised prosperity to the nation's 103.4 million people.

Critics, as well as some on the Bush administration economic team, worry that adding more beneficiaries would burden an already ailing system, just as American baby boomers begin to retire.

In the meantime, House Ways and Means Committee staff members are meeting today with Social Security officials to hash out projected costs for such an agreement.

"We are concerned about the sheer magnitude of the agreement," said a House Republican aide who is an expert on Social Security.

Currently, around 94,000 beneficiaries living abroad have been brought into the U.S. system under the auspices of about 20 international treaties. One estimate said the number of Mexicans coming into the system under the plan being considered number around 164,000 in the first five years.

Canada and South Korea are among some of the countries that already have a similar agreement with the U.S.

White House spokeswoman Claire Buchan said the issue is being explored at this time only on a "technical level" and that no decision to move forward has been made.

In 1996, the U.S. passed a law stating that foreigners not legally residing in the country could no longer claim benefits unless their home countries were subject to a treaty.

Mexico says those beneficiaries, numbering around 13,000, were owed some $50 million in 1998.

Negotiators working on the plan say the U.S. will have to build a new building in the embassy complex in Mexico City to handle the crush of claims expected, sources said.

Steven A. Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies, says if Mexicans receive the $8,100 in benefits that Mexican-born retirees in the U.S. currently get, the total expenditure for the program will easily surpass $1 billion annually.

The cost, however, is of little consequence to supporters.

"How can [the U.S. government] say this is too costly? This is money these workers paid into the Social Security system. This is their money," said Blanco.

22 posted on 12/24/2002 3:52:41 PM PST by heyhey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
I'll be recording it.
23 posted on 12/24/2002 4:03:41 PM PST by Marine Inspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: heyhey
Thanks.
24 posted on 12/24/2002 4:04:01 PM PST by Marine Inspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Will it be on C-Span?
25 posted on 12/24/2002 4:07:37 PM PST by kcar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell
Agreed, Pimental does not stand a chance against Michelle.

I'm sure Pimental will do all that you say he will, and I will be there to record everything he says.
26 posted on 12/24/2002 4:09:01 PM PST by Marine Inspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector
Bada bada Bump
27 posted on 12/24/2002 4:21:43 PM PST by S.O.S121.500
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: heyhey; firebrand
Thanks heyhey....firebrand, see post #12 for transcript of Malkin's Booknotes interview....
28 posted on 12/24/2002 4:25:03 PM PST by Dutchy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: Marine Inspector
You lucky guy!!! I wish I could go... Ricardo the Pimento is carried in my local rag...he's a class A-1 douchebagger. I hope she wipes the floor with that slimy invasion apologist.
30 posted on 12/24/2002 7:09:35 PM PST by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector
I just saw a TV commercial which implies that when a person buys some drugs that they are responsible for all the criminal activity that the drug cartels support and commit during their regular business activitites. I noticed that these commercials are sponsored by the Feds. Are the people who ignore the Constitution and refuse to defend our borders (the Feds) also responsible for all of the criminal activities of the drug cartels?
31 posted on 12/24/2002 7:17:36 PM PST by gorebegone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell
"Ricardo Pimental, a columnist for the now very left leaning Arizona Republic morning daily, seems to be a rather lightweight debater on this subject"

He may be but both of these people have more debating guts than most politicians. Lord I love a good debate.

32 posted on 12/24/2002 7:24:20 PM PST by groanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: gorebegone
Are the people who ignore the Constitution and refuse to defend our borders (the Feds) also responsible for all of the criminal activities of the drug cartels?

If we use their logic, yes they are.

33 posted on 12/24/2002 7:26:30 PM PST by Marine Inspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
I hope she wipes the floor with that slimy invasion apologist.

She will.

34 posted on 12/24/2002 7:27:49 PM PST by Marine Inspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector; madfly; Sabertooth
Stop the insanity BUMP!

Michelle Malkin

35 posted on 12/24/2002 7:41:03 PM PST by Flyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heyhey
Oh, but it's OK to tax seniors who make more than $30,000 a year 85% on their Social Security benefits. Why don't they repeal that unfair Clinton imposed tax before they start giving it to non-US citizens?
36 posted on 12/24/2002 7:59:32 PM PST by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: madfly; Marine Inspector
Do you think Butch will be in attendance?

BTW, Rush has a good interview with Malkin in his latest newsletter.

37 posted on 12/24/2002 8:02:18 PM PST by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector
Wasn't there a case at the appellate level in which a United States citizen could sue using RICO those companies who hire illegal aliens?
38 posted on 12/24/2002 8:13:41 PM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marine Inspector
bump
39 posted on 12/24/2002 8:22:01 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Wasn't there a case at the appellate level in which a United States citizen could sue using RICO those companies who hire illegal aliens?

Yes. I don't recall the details right now, but I think it was upheld.

40 posted on 12/24/2002 8:22:35 PM PST by Marine Inspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson