Posted on 12/22/2002 8:21:04 AM PST by logic101.net
LOST OPPORTUNITY; LET'S BURN THE RACE CARD MARK A SITY 12/22/02
At this date, my post is moot, but then again; it was moot when I started to write it - the opportunity was already lost. But there are lessons to be learned by elected Republicans in that we MUST take on the PC BS of the left that mutes us. We must get the truth out, and be allowed once again to speak freely. So, here is what I've been working on lately:
Conservatives and Republicans have lost yet another golden opportunity to destroy the power of the DNC over blacks. I am speaking of Trent Lott's appearance on Black Entertainment TV recently. I can't single out Lott in this though; elected Republicans all are cowards when it comes to the race card, even black Republicans.
This was an opportunity to point out to a predominantly hostile black audience exactly who it has been over the years that has been keeping them down, and who has actually been championing their rights, from equal protection to voting rights, even to affirmative action! Yet, again this opportunity was blown.
***********************************************************************
The golden opportunity came when Trent was asked about affirmative action.
The proper response would not have been to say we need more of the same. Rather it would have been to state that it was a well intentioned first step when Richard Nixon, by Executive Order, mandated affirmative action, but it hasn't progressed much beyond that point. It helped a lot of minorities, but mostly the benefits were limited to minority owned small businesses which began to pop up all over and thrive. Minorities finally had a good chance to succeed in an area they were historically shut out from. Sadly, 30 years later we have hardly progressed beyond that point. Also sadly, it was interpreted to mean quotas rather creating a really level playing field. While affirmative action helped a lot of blacks and other minorities, some were actually harmed, while even more were left unaffected in any way. Not everyone is cut out to own their own business, in many ways it is a very scary way to make a living. It is almost like selling everything you own and taking the money to the horse track; the odds are only slightly better. I salute those that have that much in the way of guts; I know I don't.
***********************************************************************
After the "interviewer" picks himself off the floor from hearing that Nixon (the ultimate evil to Liberals) actually was the one to institute their sacred affirmative action, and after answering the required question about this statement the next would most likely be how have blacks been hurt by affirmative action. Now it would be time for the kill.
*********************************************************************
Let's take a hypothetical example here. Let's call him George, a very smart black man, a recent high school graduate from an inner city school. He got straight A's in school, and he's borderline genius. Let's say that his SAT score was 600 and he applies to 2 universities, Stanford and Gainesville. Gainesville requires a SAT of 600, exactly George's score, but Stanford requires 700, 100 points above what George scored. The whole reason for the SAT is to test a potential student's preparation for a particular school. Both are fine schools, and produce fantastic graduates who are welcome in any business or industry. Under normal conditions, Stanford would reject George, fearing that he wasn't prepared for their curriculum, and they would be right; regardless of his IQ. However, because of the way affirmative action has been implemented, with quotas, Stanford needs a certain number of black students. Many potential black students come from inferior schools, which don't prepare them for a really prestigious school. But Stanford needs to make its quota, so it lowers its requirement for certain minority students. George is accepted to Stanford, and is elated; he didn't think he'd make the cut. Of course he chooses Stanford, but he's got one foot out the door before he even gets on the plane; his school didn't prepare him for Stanford. He struggles, tries his best, but Stanford didn't bring down their curriculum to the level George is prepared for, they just lowered their entry standards for him. He gets frustrated, gets low grades, and eventually drops out. However, had he gone to Gainesville, he'd have had to work hard; it would have been a challenge for him, but a challenge that he would have risen to, because he had a chance there. He wouldn't have been competing against students who came from elite private schools which are reserved for the rich, or at least the upper middle class. He'd have been competing for grades against students with the same level of preparation he had, and beating the heck out of them. Even had he stuck it out at Stanford, and gotten a degree there, he'd have been miserable; literally having to work twice as hard for half the results - even though he was smarter than most of the student body and staff! He just wasn't prepared for that school. Plus, it's better to graduate from Gainesville with an A or B average than a D from Stanford; much more is learned when you master a subject.
Rather than requiring certain numbers in universities, what we really should be doing is getting our primary education system up to par. Most public schools cannot compare to the results seen in private schools. However, blacks, and many other minorities are prevented from sending their kids to private schools because of lower income. When it is a choice of putting food on the table, or sending the kids to private school; food will always win out. In the affluent suburbs, if there is a bad teacher who can't relate to the kids, and can't therefore teach them, that teacher is run out. This is because there is competition in the suburbs; the parents can legitimately threaten to take their kids out of the public school system - they can afford to. The bad teachers get sent to the inner city schools where the parents don't have that ability, and the school boards know it.
This is why we need to end the monopoly of the public schools on education dollars; we need vouchers so that all parents, rich or poor are empowered to send their kids to schools that will serve their children's future needs. The elitists have been blocking my party from allowing vouchers to empower poor parents. It seems they don't want their children rubbing shoulders with poor kids. They don't want their kids to have the competition from minority children. Oddly, these same people claim to be the champions of your rights and your children's future.
**********************************************************************
Right here we would have won over ¼ of the black vote. Most blacks want the ability to send their kids to the school of their choice; but are blocked by the DNC who is in the debt of the Teachers Union. This fact is hidden from them by the main-line press. Also hidden from the public is the fact that Democrats have been the ones to fight hardest against any form of equality among the races. Once blacks got backing on their right to vote (thanks to the Republicans), then Democrats changed their public profile, and pretended to support black rights; while still trying to destroy their ability to get ahead at the same time.
Hopefully the education could go on with something like this:
One of the problems we have had in the issue of race is that only one side is allowed to debate the issue, and this does not make for a real debate. I made a comment that I thought nothing of, and I was demonized for it. When I made that comment, I wasn't even thinking that Sen. Thurmond had been a segregationist; in the 30 yrs I have known him he has not been. We have become friends, and agreed on many issues, including education vouchers for poor kids. However, when it comes to the race issue; we are bared from speaking because we are white Republicans. In every sentence we utter, we must watch for the PC police. If we don't utter the Democrat party line on certain issues; we are demonized. Yet, Democrats like the now Sen. Hollings can hoist the Confederate Flag over the Capital in South Carolina, and that's ok; but the current Republican Governor is tarred and feathered with the issue. Sen. Byrd, a former leader of the KKK can use the "N" word on national TV, and that's ok; he's a Democrat. I don't know of any Republican Senators who were even members of the KKK, much less leaders. The double standard needs to be lifted; and blame placed where it belongs. By silencing half the nation, the cause of empowering the poor is not helped. We need an open and honest debate on the issues of both race and poverty, but with the current PC situation we can't have one. There is no reason that blacks today still tend to cling to the bottom of the economic scale; except that policies that would help them to progress are not allowed a fair hearing. Only the DNC party line is accepted for public consumption, all other views are shut out. They are shut out by the fear of being labeled a racist. This only perpetuates the status quo.
A frank discussion of this nature is needed for not only the Republicans to achieve their agenda, but also for poor minorities to begin to move up the ladder.
MARK A SITY http://www.logic101.net/
But more importantly, It would help emmensely if the person making this argument had some credibility with the black audience they were addressing. Lott would not have been a believable person to make the argument. Bush I think could make this argument in a nationally televised speech. I think he may have missed an opportunity to make it in the aftermath of 9/11.
Excellent point!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.