Skip to comments.
Al Gore - Can this souffle rise a second time?
The Washington Times ^
| 12-1-02
| Steve Chapman
Posted on 12/01/2002 5:49:41 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:59:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Watching Al Gore make his re-entry into the public arena after nearly two years out of the spotlight, I can say with confidence there is a substantial group of people who want him to run for president again in 2004. They're called Republicans.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: chads; gore; lockbox; lostarkansas; lostdebates; lostflorida; losttennesee; riskyscheme; runslikeagirl; sigh; soreloserman; whiner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Dingel-Norwood.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Gore - Can this souffle rise a second time?I must have missed the first rise.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Al Gore - Can this souffle rise a second time? No.....
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Amazing how many articles just like this one have been written lately. There's just something about Al Gore that inspires contempt, even in his supporters. Reason enough why he should never be President.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The answer is complicaed only by who else from the Dems might show up for the primaries.
Otherwise, I would contend that Gore is toast....Debate #1...Jag, prick, obnoxious Al......Debate #2, Mr. Softie, Wussy, afraid to overstep, Debate #3, Desperate Al, Oh my gosh I might lose Al......
Who is Al Gore? this time around, if he makes it through the primaries....the question of "who is Al Gore" will stick and will kill him off politically for good. The real question is, will his own party do it our....ooooohhh and I hope it is this one...can the Republicans and Bush do it...Please be Bush, please be Bush.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Souffle rising again?
Rather than courting what inevitably would be electoral disaster, Al would be better off staying at home, honing his skills at making one of these:
To: Oldeconomybuyer
. It was a matter of him being unlikable, phony and prone to inventing facts.Oh, you mean lying.
7
posted on
12/01/2002 6:14:37 AM PST
by
Quilla
To: MeeknMing
There is NO WAY that anyone BUT algore will be the rat nominee in 04. The simple truth is that the very primary system that the rats themselves put together after the mcgovern disaster, will once again come back to bite them on the ash. In our primaries those to the right vote. This is why we sometimes get unelectable candidates like Schundler in New Jersey and Simon in calf. But the rat's tinfoil haters vote in thier primaries. So that is why you get commies like ruth messenger to run against Rudy for mayor and mccall to go against Pataki for gov. algore will be nominated for two reasons: The rat tinfoil hatters will listen to his bull shiite about being robbed in Florida and second, seeing this, the rats will realize that this one is lost and this would be a great way to shut gore up and get rid of him for good.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
When he says, "I think there is virtue in just taking an unvarnished position as to what the best solution may be, and let the chips fall where they may," "I think there ith virtue in juth taking an invarnithed pothithion ath to what the beth tholution may be, and let the chips fall where they may".
He is just so girly.
To: irish guard
The answer is complicaed only by who else from the Dems might show up for the primaries.If the economy gets better and no more 911s, the dems will let Gore go for the nomination.
Sacrificial lamb... no need to soil a challenger for 2008.
One thing for sure, the dems will be going uphill in 2004.
10
posted on
12/01/2002 6:18:57 AM PST
by
johnny7
To: jmaroneps37
There is NO WAY that anyone BUT algore will be the rat nominee in 04.... In that case, then, I would agree with the first paragraph of this article:
I can say with confidence there is a substantial group of people who want him to run for president again in 2004. They're called Republicans.
Run, algore, RUN !!
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"
He obviously thinks he really won that election, and he may be right"
I quit reading right here since the author is obviously unaware of the facts. Gore lost - get over it.
12
posted on
12/01/2002 6:25:01 AM PST
by
par4
To: Oldeconomybuyer
. It could easily have been Mr. Gore who won the court fight and Mr. Bush who came out of it looking bitter. Actually, although President Bush's supporters might have been bitter, enraged, and militant about resisting the theft of the election, Bush would have gone back to Texas, finished his term as governor, and retired to his ranch a happy man. We would have heard nothing from him except as it pertained to Texas. That is one of the major differences between the two men.
To: par4
re: "He obviously thinks he really won that election, and he may be right"
Hmm, could we call this Electoral College nullification?
14
posted on
12/01/2002 6:40:44 AM PST
by
I_dmc
Al should just be grateful he can appear in public without getting pelted with tomatoes.
What he did in Florida was shameful, selfish and harmful to our nation.
15
posted on
12/01/2002 6:46:43 AM PST
by
D-fendr
To: Oldeconomybuyer
16
posted on
12/01/2002 6:46:59 AM PST
by
Hugin
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The correct title for this article is: Can This Fruitcake Rise a Second Time?
To: shortstop
> Al Gore 2004 Merchandise |
|
|
|
|
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"...he got half a million more votes..."Voting fraud was found in five states other than Florida, all DNC induced........we'll never know how badly Al Gore lost, but lost he did! The popular vote argument is just hot air if not sour grapes.
19
posted on
12/01/2002 7:13:17 AM PST
by
yoe
To: jmaroneps37
A good analysis of the primary system and Al Gore's fate. When you say that it's the "the rat's tinfoil hatters [who] vote in their primaries," I take you to mean the left wing of the party. True enough, and what the dem leadership doesn't seem to realize is that liberalism, i.e., democratic socialism, is no longer mainstream (thank God)...so here we have them putting up Nancy Pelosi as their leader, who most certainly will herd them leftward into la-la land. Now that lying slimeball clinton was quite adept at reading the political climate of this country, and he successfully portrayed himself as mainsteam. He constantly reinvented himself, came up with the spin du jour, and maniputated the media into buying it. When Gore tries this, he fails completely. We know who Al Gore is; he's been around since the 70s. On the other hand, clinton came out of nowhere. Gore is simply not a good liar...the alpha male, the earth tones, the family man, the father of the internet, the arrogant insider, the tobacco farmer, the confident debater and the wuss debater. What new version of Al Gore will be trotted out this time? His attacks on President Bush in San Francisco before the election fell flat...if anything he helped the Republicans. No one is buying his & Tipper's books. "...the rats," you say, "will realize that this one is lost and this would be a great way to shut gore up and get rid of him for good..." I would only add, "...by sending him out to be the sacrificial lamb."
20
posted on
12/01/2002 7:38:52 AM PST
by
cloud8
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson