Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed threatens the Netherlands with terror attacks
De Telegraaf ^ | November 29 2002

Posted on 11/29/2002 3:36:40 AM PST by knighthawk

Muslim-extremist Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed openly threathens with terroristic attacks in the Netherlands if it does not stop 'arresting muslims'. The Sheikh support Osama bin Laden.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; alqaida; netherlands; omarbakrimohammed; osamabinlanden; sheikh

1 posted on 11/29/2002 3:36:40 AM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed lives in London and is from the islamic organization al-Muhajiroun and Hizb ut Tahrir.

http://www.almuhajiroun.com/index.php
http://www.hizb-ut-tahrir.org/english/english.html
http://www.khilafah.com/home/lographics/web_links.php

This months Dutch police detained a muslims who planned suicide attacks abroad. I guess this is what this Sheikh is talking about.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/784696/posts

In total there are 16 muslims held over terrorism charges in the Netherlands.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/796444/posts

A profile on this man:

http://www.memri.de/uebersetzungen_analysen/themen/islamistische_ideologie/isl_bakri_24_10_01.pdf

HTML version:

http://www.google.nl/search?q=cache:Y_JddGJeEKsC:www.memri.de/uebersetzungen_analysen/themen/islamistische_ideologie/isl_bakri_24_10_01.pdf+Omar+Bakri+Mohammed&hl=nl&ie=UTF-8
2 posted on 11/29/2002 3:39:20 AM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Maybe it's time this mullah got a visit from a CIA predater!
3 posted on 11/29/2002 3:40:07 AM PST by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; watchin; VOA; harpseal; timestax; xJones; justshutupandtakeit; TopDog2; ThomasMore; ...
Muslim-extremist Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed openly threathens with terroristic attacks in the Netherlands if it does not stop 'arresting muslims'. The Sheikh support Osama bin Laden.

Islam-list

If people want on or off this list, please let me know.

4 posted on 11/29/2002 3:42:28 AM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exnavy
Maybe it's time this mullah got a visit from a CIA predater!

No need to be so spectacular. Why is it that this kind of man is not found floating in the river with a .22 caliber hole in his head? I would have thought Sept. 11th would have taught the spooks that a little preventative 'wet work' is nothing to be ashamed of. We ought to have teams hunting these imams down, all over the world.

-ccm

5 posted on 11/29/2002 3:45:23 AM PST by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
We ought to have teams hunting these imams down, all over the world.

It's time to hire some former KGB experts to do the job!

Their work is legendary and will strike fear in every Islamist leader.

6 posted on 11/29/2002 5:12:17 AM PST by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
Time to revive an old tradition.

LETTERS OF MARQUE

BE IT KNOWN, That in pursuance of an act of congress, passed on the 26th day of June one thousand eight hundred and twelve, I have Commissioned, and by these presents do commission, the private armed Brig called the Prince Neufchatel of the burden of three hundred & Nineteen tons, or thereabouts, owned by John Ordronaux & Peter E. Trevall of the City & State of New York and Joseph Beylle of Philadelphia in the State of Pennsylvania Mounting eighteen carriage guns, and navigated by one hundred & twenty nine men, hereby authorizing Nicholas Millin captain, and William Stetson lieutenant of the said Brig and the other officers and crew thereof, to subdue, seize, and take any armed or unarmed British vessel, public or private, which shall be found within the jurisdictional limits of the United States, or elsewhere on the high seas, or within the waters of the British dominions, and such captured vessel, with her apparel, guns, and appertenances, and the goods or effects which shall be found on board the same, together with all the british persons and others who shall be found acting on board, to bring within some port of the United States; and also to retake any vessel, goods, and effects of the people of the United States, which may have been captured by any British armed vessel, in order that proceedings may be had concerning such capture or recapture in due form of law, and as to right and justice shall appertain. The said Nicholas Millin is further authorized to detain, seize, and take all vessels and effects, to whomsoever belonging, which shall be liabel thereto according to the law of nations and the rights of the United States as a power at war, and to bring the same within some port of the United States, in order that due proceedings may be had thereon. This commission to continue in force during the pleasure of the president of the United States for the time being.

GIVEN under my hand and seal of the United States of America, at the City of Washington, the twelfth day of December in the year of our Lord, one thousand eight hundred and fourteen and of the independence of the said states the thirty ninth.

BY THE PRESIDENT James Madison Jas. Monroe, Secretary of State.
7 posted on 11/29/2002 5:27:28 AM PST by Kozak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
It's time to hire some former KGB experts to do the job! Their work is legendary and will strike fear in every Islamist leader.

Interesting proposal, probably being considered. We don't care who does it, only that the mission is accomplished. BTW I like the line used by a Russian comedian - KGB stands for "Kiss Goodby your Butt!"

8 posted on 11/29/2002 6:47:36 AM PST by toddst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
I expect capitulation and cowardice from France, Belgium and the other assortment of Apologists-For-Arab-Terror EU nations. I have been disappointed by the backslide of Scandinavian countries into a position of soft-pedaling the threat from Islamist expansion.

The actions taken with in their own borders demonstrate courage, however, the hypocrisy of their constant harping and criticisms directed toward Israel and the U.S. demonstrate a new low in diplomatic double-talk between Scandinavia and the U.S.

9 posted on 11/29/2002 6:50:01 AM PST by 1bigdictator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
From your link

http://www.memri.de/uebersetzungen_analysen/themen/islamistische_ideologie/isl_bakri_24_10_01.pdf

Bakri has no objections to airplane hijackings, as indicated by his statements to the Egyptian weekly Roz Al-Yussuf : "The Islamic movement has the right to sacrifice whoever it sees fit. The rule is that [Muslim] children, women, and the weak should not be a goal except in one situation: if it is difficult to win without sacrificing them. So, if hijackers find [Muslim] women, and children and elderly people on a [hijacked] plane, they should set them free except if the goal of the hijackers is to free women, children, and elderly people held prisoners in countries. In this case, they can be kept, because the blood of Muslims is equal [to others' blood], but they can sacrifice foreigners on the plane… and if you study Shari'a you will know that. The fedya [ransom] of a Muslim is 12,000 dirhams, while that of a Dhimmi [i.e. a Christian or a Jew under Muslim rule] is 4,000 dirhams."

Sums up the sickness of the Muslim view of other peoples.

10 posted on 11/29/2002 7:34:17 AM PST by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
Or use a M-14.
11 posted on 11/29/2002 8:02:04 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
BUMP
12 posted on 11/29/2002 6:42:48 PM PST by crazykatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
GOOGLE Search Term: "OMAR BAKRI MOHAMMED"
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=%22Omar+Bakri+Mohammed%22&btnG=Google+Search
13 posted on 11/29/2002 7:21:56 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Muslim-extremist Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed openly threathens with terroristic attacks in the Netherlands if it does not stop 'arresting muslims'. The Sheikh support Osama bin Laden.

And Powell and Bush are RECRUITING MORE MUSLIMS FOR THE USA!

14 posted on 11/30/2002 11:08:28 AM PST by Abar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Why isn't he in jail?
15 posted on 11/30/2002 11:26:06 AM PST by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench
Shouldn't we have a fatwa on his life like so many of his brethren are good at? Let's let the free market take care of it: $10K for his head.

Maybe they'll then stop coming up with those fatwas!
16 posted on 11/30/2002 11:56:05 AM PST by winner3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
The Dutch better find another little boy Hans in case the dikes need plugging.

Leni

17 posted on 11/30/2002 12:01:16 PM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
Sounds good to me. The policing agencies and the military can't do it all. But the entire society has become way to accustomed to having the government take care of "everything," that some very prudent steps — like reviving Letters of Marque and the old civil defense network — just are not even being considered.
18 posted on 11/30/2002 12:05:53 PM PST by Wolfstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: winner3000
If any Brits issue a fatwah, they'll be arrested for hate crimes. (Maybe I just dreamt that I read a story about Brits being arested for hate crimes?) Anyway, isn't this guy doing much worse? Bizarre.
19 posted on 11/30/2002 12:18:08 PM PST by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
The common defense of the cowardly is to insist that the violent are in the right, and that if one only gives them what they rightfully want they'll stop being violent. That is a convenient out for many Europeans who are content to ascribe the violence to U.S. policies toward Israel; speak out against the U.S., goes the argument, (there is, after all, no penalty for doing so), and you will be spared.

Well, the mask's off. Moslem radicals will resort to threats of violence because up to now those threats have been successful. And their demands aren't restricted to policies on Israel or Iraq; they subsume everything that the radicals consider in their interest. And their victims aren't restricted to Israelis and Americans - they never really were, but it was a convenient and comforting fiction. No more.

Bush wasn't being threatening when he stated "you're either with us or against us," he was stating a sad fact. U.S. bombers aren't targeting the cities of the uncooperative governments, Moslem bombers are.

20 posted on 11/30/2002 12:33:43 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson