Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tolkien, Serling, and their unlikely fans
Vanity | 11/16/02 | Zionist Conspirator

Posted on 11/16/2002 5:26:51 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator

I have often wondered if there are any conservatives who are fans of "The Twilight Zone," the classic series created by the notorious liberal Rod Serling.

Then earlier today I saw a PBS show about J.R.R. Tolkien and was reminded that this conservative icon not only was a hero to radical flower children in the Sixties (with which his work seems to have no connection whatsoever) but also spawned the entire "fantasy" genre, which many conservatives condemn as being evil and satanic, even while giving Tolkien a free pass.

What was there about Tolkien and his decidedly pre-modern vision that appealed to those "ultimate modernists" of the Sixties? How did their "peace and love" philosophy find anything in Tolkien's extremely dualistic, military epic that appealed to it?

As to Serling (my original intended topic), while he was well known as a militant liberal, many of his shows seem to contradict the liberal stereotype (for example, the alien plot to destroy manking through the drinking water, in which the paranoids are right and the normal people are wrong).

It is often claimed that Serling had to disguise his liberal messages to get them past the censors, but some of his liberal messages seem to be buried very deeply. Are not his critiques of the totalitarian, groupthink society (in such eps as "Eye of the Beholder" or the episodes in which everyone picks an attractive body to be transplanted into or the episode in which Hollywood leftist Burgess Meredith defends the existence of G-d) just as "conservative" as they are "liberal?" He also used conservative actors a lot (perhaps because they were available) and he also cast or presented several stories in which the upland South "hillbilly" culture is presented sympathetically (perhaps as a cipher for Black culture). Chr*stian references are also quite common (Serling was born on chr*stmas day).

I am sure that he became in his later years--and would be today were he alive--a much more conventional leftist, but I am asking specifically about the classic series of 1959-1963.

Does Serling have any conservative fans here? Any thoughts about Tolkien's seemingly unusual fandom?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; Philosophy; Unclassified; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: fans; serling; tolkien
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: Zionist Conspirator
My experience has been that there are a lot of conservatives who are Science Fiction/Fantasy fans. So it is no wonder that Tolkien and LOTR have had so many threads on this forum. However as an SF fan, I have never counted The Twilight Zone as all that good. True Mr. Serling did write a show that was adventurous for it's time. But, The Twilight Zone, for my money, relied way to much on the twist ending. The episodes that just gave you a gripping SF story straight up we few and far between.
21 posted on 11/16/2002 6:28:18 PM PST by GreenLanternCorps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
>>...What was there about Tolkien and his decidedly pre-modern vision that appealed to those "ultimate modernists" of the Sixties? ...<<

Elves.

22 posted on 11/16/2002 6:28:41 PM PST by FReepaholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
My experiences with fandom of Tolkien in the 70's that it was drug based. As with the attraction of Disney's Fantasia (which some druggies showed as proof Walt Disney popped acid) , many druggies I knew rushed to the theatres in 1979 to see the animated Lord of the Rings and did a couple of hits before they went. I do not believe a lot of the interest of that time went as deep as to discover the true meanings of the works.
23 posted on 11/16/2002 6:28:44 PM PST by L`enn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
In terms of the "fantasy" genre, it's pretty safe to lump in the condemnation of the "fantasy genre" as "satanic" and "evil" with the same demonstrations of inherent stupidity people show when they blame guns for killing people or blaming video games for violent acts.
24 posted on 11/16/2002 6:29:18 PM PST by Dark Seraph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastforker
I think ZC is a messianic Jew, and Jews tend not to like to write the name of God out of respect. A lot of them will write His name G-d, carrying on the tradition of substituting the holy name YHWH with Adonai.

Don't assume ZC has ill intentions in writing Chr-st

25 posted on 11/16/2002 6:30:22 PM PST by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: fporretto
>>...I would say that Tolkien's appeal to the youth of the Sixties and early Seventies was rooted in the richness of his imaginary world and the support it lent to their escapist impulses. ...<<

Well said.

At that time we had the Vietnam war and riots and unrest at home. Adding to that the normal angst and turmoil of being a teenager, I found Middle Earth a most welcome escape.

26 posted on 11/16/2002 6:37:41 PM PST by FReepaholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: eastforker
I think possibly you misunderstand. It is a mark of some Jewish piety -- of respect! -- NOT to write the full word "God". (Obviously, I do not share this piety, but I respect it.)

This is based, as I believe, on the commandment not to take God's name in vain. Similar piety is evidenced by Jesus Himself when he uses "reverential periphrasis" to avoid saying the name of God. Even today people will speak of the "will of Heaven", when what they mean is the will of God.

The avoidance of spelling God or Christ completely is a sign of pious respect. Certainly it can be disagreed with, but to suggest that the person who does so is "ashamed" of God, as I believe another poster did, is to miss the point.

27 posted on 11/16/2002 6:38:56 PM PST by Mad Dawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
Serling is a liberal in the traditional sense. Liberal in the sense of promoting equality and individual right. A conservative, traditionally, supported the state and the group over the rights of individuals. Like two vast armies of pikemen confronting each other on a flat field of battle the terms have rotated 180 degrees over the last 50 years. Today it is the conservatives who promote individual rights and equality before the law, and it is liberals who support the power of the state and groups over individual rights. If Serling were alive today he would be closer in spirit to Ben Stein than Garrison Keillor.
28 posted on 11/16/2002 6:44:40 PM PST by No Truce With Kings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg
My point being,you have to think it to write it,so if you think of the word Christ,but write it Chr-st,you have done nothing but label yourself as a hypocrit IMHO.
29 posted on 11/16/2002 6:47:38 PM PST by eastforker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
I didn't know of Serlings politics until recently.

I am in a minority, though. I have consistently found Twilight Zone episodes to be astonishly bad. The series is hailed as one of the greatest of all time, but I think that 10% or so of the episodes are very good or better, and about 90% or so are mind-blowingly bad.

Rod is VERY heavy handed. His stories are simple and crude - very linear except for his 'twist ending,' which, once you see 2 or 3 Zone episodes, is pretty predictable.

Serling's dialogue is poor. People talk 'at' each other rather than with each other. Long monologues that are preachy and heavy handed. Most of his characters have the same 'voice,' that is, Rod's voice. He has no real range.

His stories are very simple. An old variety show called 'The New Show' (which I love, by the way) did a skit once, Twilight Zonettes. The premise was that since the typical "Zone" story could be told in under 30 seconds (which is true by the way), the producers would shoehorn 4 or 6 stories within a half hour - pretty funny cayse they acted them out and it was so damning!!! Zone stories are just too simple.

As it stands, the show stretched a 30 second idea into a half hour. You think that's bad, try seeing the hourlong "Twilight Zones." Now, THAT'S BAD STUFF!!!!

Zone is a shallow, lite fix. You watch an episode, and come away with a simple lesson - "Oh, she was really beautiful to us, but she was ugly to the people of her planet where everyone would be considered 'ugly' to us!" Thanks, Rod!!!! I'm a better person now for that thoughtful lesson!

Give me "Outer Limits" any day of the week - much more sophisticated and well made Science Fiction.

30 posted on 11/16/2002 6:51:19 PM PST by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Livfreeordi
"Other obviously conservative sceince fiction writers over the years?"

It had been several years since I read them, but CS Lewis's Out of the Silent Planet, Perelandra, and That Hideous Strength came to my mind. Maybe other Freepers can say more, but I remember these three works as having insightful, moral lessons.
31 posted on 11/16/2002 6:53:51 PM PST by Beth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: fporretto
Sorry, but The Silmarillion's release had little to do with outside pressure. It was Tolkien himself that wanted to release it. LOTR's release was delayed in part by Tolkien's desire to release both books as one complete package. But since it was unfinished, he was unable to put together a deal at that time. He spent many years working on it, but he never did finish any one complete version of it (at least not since before The Hobbit). Part of the problem was that he was constantly revising his vision of Middle Earth. In the end, with his wife dead and his health fading, he advised his son on what would needed to be done to finish The Silmarillion if he was unable to finish it (and he was quite aware that he wouldn't). While many others wanted to him to publish, Tolkien was way ahead of them in that desire. But it was a tale that he worked on from his recovery after the Somme till his death.
32 posted on 11/16/2002 6:54:00 PM PST by LenS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
An hour and a half and over 30 post and you have not responded to any of them.Why do a vanity post,ask for FReepers opinions,then ignore what they have to say?Why even post at all?
33 posted on 11/16/2002 7:03:14 PM PST by eastforker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Livfreeordi
Other obviously conservative sceince fiction writers over the years?

The incomparable Jack Vance.

34 posted on 11/16/2002 7:03:31 PM PST by Interesting Times
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jude24
I very much enjoyed your post. I completely agree. Little more to add except that I have read only the first of the trilogy, and will read the second before the movie is released. Looking forward to it.
35 posted on 11/16/2002 7:08:23 PM PST by Skooz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz
...and the beautiful girl undergoing plastic surgery so she could get a pig face like everybody else.

The story I remember most clearly was the one that depicted a group of men and women struggling to escape the planet in a space ship before the nuclear holocaust. It was only at the very end that we learned they were on some other planet - hoping to escape to Earth!!!!

And who can forget the other story in which an all-powerful alien comes to earth to present a book entitled "How Best to Serve Man", and only at the end, after a number of humans have climbed aboard his space craft to return home with him, do we learn that the book is a cook book!!!

And then of course the story of the librarian with the inch-thick glasses played by Burgess Meredith - who only wanted to be left alone to browse Free Republic....er...read his books. Then one day, thanks to some sort of nuclear war, he finds himself alone with his beloved books - however his glasses lay broken on the ground.

Twilight Zone was a classic indeed!

36 posted on 11/16/2002 7:39:16 PM PST by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator

To: Livfreeordi
The libertarian-minded Robert A. Heinlein ( Starship Troopers, the Moon is a Harsh Mistress),

Remember, Heinlein also penned Stranger in a Strange Land, which was a HUGE influence on the Hippie culture, especially in its endorsement of casual nudity and group sex. It's still a big seller among "polyamory" and alternative-lifestyle types...

38 posted on 11/16/2002 7:52:55 PM PST by MikalM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: souris
LOL - a project I've been putting off for years is recording "The Twilight Zone" theme music using just multitracked guitars. I have the score, and it's doable.

I can do a pretty good solo rendition, but it needs the harmonies of the brass at the end to sound real.

39 posted on 11/16/2002 7:57:56 PM PST by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
Ping!

And marking to read later...
40 posted on 11/16/2002 7:58:52 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson