Posted on 11/07/2002 10:59:38 AM PST by Impeach98
Edited on 04/12/2004 5:46:05 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Bill Simon's political team inadvertently accomplished what no one thought possible just two years ago: They ran a campaign against Democrat Gov. Gray Davis without mentioning the energy crisis.
Team Simon tried to run the Republican candidate for governor as an ethical standard-bearer in moderate California. The strategy wasted four years of work by Republicans in the Legislature, who hammered Davis on energy missteps and then heroically sustained a budget debate until September even as it was obvious that Team Simon was doing nothing to take advantage of their efforts. Instead, the Simon campaign defied the wisdom of all its polling, its extensive focus groups and even recent California political history. It entered the ethics minefield.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
A week before the primary I remember Arnie Steinberg wrote how Simon was a loser and couldn't win and predicted victory for Bill Jones (who came in last).
After that he began whining about how Bill Simon never deserved to win the GOP nomination. Now he has all these reasons why Bill Simon lost.
Instead I prefer the analysis of a former Simon staffer I knew who was much more keen than Mr. Steinberg. He helped elect Simon during the primary and would have been a wise adviser for Simon had the Sean Walsh-Rob Lapsley failed Jones advisers not taken over the campaign.
.
The advice has been so bad that it makes me wonder if there aren't Democrat "5th columnist" agents of influence on the payroll of the CA state GOP (CRP). Hate to venture into the "conspiracy nut" category, but California is NOT a monolithically Democrat state. There are one heck of a lot of Republicans out here who could make a run of things. But it seems like the state GOP organization trashes every opportunity.
Simon was a good candidate. His "political" instincts were immature, but he was a solid candidate. God Himself would have a hard time running effectively if the Devil had a $60 million head start to define Him as evil.
These were the issues that Mr. Davis was most vulnerable on. And these will surely be the areas of his failures in his second term. Too bad Mr. Lapsley and Mr. Walsh did not understand this.
This part I do agree with. No matter who it was who guided Mr. Simon it would have been tough against that much money thrown at him... constantly defining who Bill Simon was instead of who Mr. Davis was and his failed track record.
Let us all now focus on ridding ourselves of Ms. Barbara Boxer!!
Not gonna happen with THIS crew. If the same people manage the campaign of the anti-Boxer candidate, that woman will be so entrenched that she'll one day be Senate Minority Leader.
Five months ago I predicted that the California GOP leadership, and Simon, were so inept that what should be won by more than 15 points would be lost by about five points. I take NO pleasure in being right. I have lived in three other states, and none of them remotely approaches the abysmal quality of this state's GOP officials.
Republicans would often do better to hire ad agencies from the yellow pages instead of the crews of misfits they all too often wind up with.
If it weren't so serious, the campaigns of Lazio in NY, Forrester in NJ, and this Simon guy would be funny! And not one word about voter fraud in CA? How the hell would anyone know who won anything in LALA LAND?
This OpEd seems to explain in better detail why that was and it makes me feel better about Bill Simon. Although he did hire and entrust Mr. Walsh and Mr. Lapsley so I guess he has to accept that blame.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.