A Question

philosofy123

[philosofy123]

Out of the 19 Islamic terrorists that attacked America in 9/11, how many Iraqis?

Hint-----ZERO

Out of the thousands of Islamic militants arrested in the US and Europe, how many Iraqis?

Hint----ZERO

Where did the US discover there is a new El Quaida terrorist camp? Hint----Iran, not Iraq

Well, I am not the smartest man in the world, but the above facts should give me a hint on who should be my greatest enemy?

[philosofy123]

These couple of questions were never asked by any of the thousands of journalists? Do you think the Administration knows something that we mortals don't know? Everytime there is breifing of the leaders of Congress, they come out and say, the Administration did not tell them anyting new?

I think the administration should tell the Congressional leaders about their reason for considering Iraq more dangerous than Iran, or Suadi Arabia, and then these leaders should tell us that they are happy with that choice! This way, the protest from the right, and the logical opinions would subside.

[Michael Barnes]

Who pays Pali families of suicide bombers 1000's of dollars if their relatives blow themselves up?

Hint - IRAQ

Who did timothy McVeigh meet with prior to The OKC bombing?

Hint - Iraqi's

Who has broken every UN resolution since the gulf war?

Hint - Iraq

Who tried to have Bush 41 assasinated?

Hint - Iraq

[My2Cents]

Do you think the Administration knows something that we mortals don't know?

Bush did a pretty good job laying out the reasons to move against Saddam at the UN a couple of weeks ago. Were you not listening? As far as we know, neither Iran nor Saudi Arabia are working on nukes. That's reason enough to snuff-out Saddam first. It's also highly possible that a change in regime in Iraq will change the whole political chemistry of the Arab world...perhaps.

[SunStar]

Iran's government will most likely fall without a war launched by the USA. Iraq's will not. Additionally, when we are able to use Iraq as a staging ground, it will be easy to box Iran in.

[w1andsodidwe]

Well, I am not the smartest man in the world, but the above facts should give me a hint on who should be my greatest enemy?

I guess that WMD's don't concern you?

[blam]

It's very simple, Saddam will kill you when he has the capability, what don't you understand about that. Should we wait until you are dead before we take action?

[Soliton]

The war on terrorism will never succeed until the sponsors of terror are eliminated. Iran and Saudi Arabia and Syria are need targeted. One at a time.

[AzJP]

Ah, you're logical, rational, and specific.

You'll get flamed, but that validates the three adjectives I used.

m

[Brilliant]

Do you think it was coincidence that none of Saddam's subjects were on the planes? Do you really think that if Saddam were behind this, he would put Iraqis on those planes? To me, the absence of Iraqis just proves his involvement. He made sure that no Iraqis would be on the planes. As for Iran, yes we may eventually need to deal with them, but let's take them one at a time. The Iranian government may yet collapse by itself.

[LiberationIT]

Wow! What an insightful, deep, probing analysis. You sure covered it all. I'm convinced! </sarcasm>

[Cyber Liberty]

"Well, I am not the smartest man in the world...

The one part of your post I can agree with....

[Peach]

Who invaded a neighboring country? Who gassed his own countrymen? Who has violated all 16 UN resolutions? Who has harbored terrorists? Who has stated a desire to obtain the weapons necessary to wipe us out? The answer to all these questions is Iraq. But you knew that already.

[dyed_in_the_wool]

If I sought to control Persia, if not govern it, but to control it, I might seek a situation whereby I could close in from both sides.
Historically, you would either come through the Afghan mountains or up from the Middle East, via Iraq.
If we take Iraq (okay, when we take Iraq) where does that leave Iran?
U.S. controls the East. U.S. Controls the West.
That would then be two of the three members of the Axis of Evil.
Or can't you think that far ahead? Why would you take on Iran when you already have Iraq by the short, curly ones?

[SunStar]

The war on terrorism will never succeed until the sponsors of terror are eliminated. Iran and Saudi Arabia and Syria are need targeted. One at a time.

Yes, and what better staging ground is there than Iraq?

[encm(ss)]

How do you think an Iraqi citizen gets into the U.S.? Red flashing lights? They could not take that chance especially when they got all the Saudi's waiting, foaming at the mouth. Sorry.

[philosofy123]

Correction, my friend,---Iran has a much more advanced nuclear program than Iraq, and is working closer with the terrorists. They did not have inspectors in their country for twenty years? God knowes how much biological and chemical weapons they made through the unemployed Russians?

[mdittmar]

Would almost make sense, if there was only 19 terrorists out there,missed it by that much.

[js1138]

Two neighboring countries.

[tuckrdout]

Your answer lies in the words of the President, when he said that if he had known anything about the 9-11 attacks ahead of time, he would have done everything in his power to stop them.

I believe him.

And I see him doing everything in his power, right now...to stop a nuclear attack against the United States.