Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AMY & VINCE - TOOGOOD!
Illinois Leader ^ | 9/23/2002 | Kevin McCullough

Posted on 09/23/2002 4:11:58 PM PDT by KMC1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-192 next last
Kevin McCullough is heard weekdays in Chicago on AM1160 WYLL, and worldwide on www.wyll.com.

Contact Kevin: kmc@wyll.com

1 posted on 09/23/2002 4:11:58 PM PDT by KMC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KMC1
I saw Sandi Patti onstage and was not able to give her the standing ovation that EVERYONE else in the crowd gave because of her tepid explanations of why she was undergoing a divorce at that time.

I look for exemplary lives among Christian leaders such as music stars also.

2 posted on 09/23/2002 4:16:37 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KMC1
People someimes fall out of love, to be sure. But the proper response for 2 Christians is to stick with it and persevere.

BTW, Amy Grant joins Bruce Springsteen and other artists as well who are not as popular post-divorce.

3 posted on 09/23/2002 4:20:54 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KMC1
Interesting. I don't follow the Christian music scene, but it must be a difficult life to keep faithful to in those circumstances--kind of like being a televangelist.

I hope the new Miss America can stay the course. We need more good examples for kids to follow.
4 posted on 09/23/2002 4:24:35 PM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KMC1
Well, at least we don't have to worry about "people of faith" forgiving anyone ... hey wait a minute ...
5 posted on 09/23/2002 4:31:33 PM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KMC1
This type of editorial diatribe is exactly why I left the world of "Christian Entertainment".

Note to the author: Keven, no one forced you to attend the concert. I suppose the lives Amy has touched are moot because you are scandalized at her humanity?

I met Amy quite a few years ago when I was employed as music director for a large christian television network and studio musician. She was as real then as she is now. With the same emotions, hardships and failings as any living human.

The dissapointment ends when fans stop treating entertainers as gods (little g) and realize that they should get their own lives and stop living vicariously through their idols.

We are all sinners, saved by grace........and as for you, Mr. McCullough.......if you are without sin then toss the first stone.

6 posted on 09/23/2002 4:36:29 PM PDT by Fighting Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up
of her tepid explanations of why she was undergoing a divorce at that time.

One of my cousins gave tepid explanations for a divorce and that bothered certain people. Her ex-husband seemed like such a nice guy but he had been cheating on her ---with a babysitter. For the sake of her kids and maybe everyone she made a decision not to discuss their problems to everyone. Sometimes a marriage can look perfect but no one knows what goes on behind closed doors.

7 posted on 09/23/2002 4:41:18 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ikka; KMC1
ikka, let me hit your comments in reverse order:

BTW, Amy Grant joins Bruce Springsteen and other artists as well who are not as popular post-divorce.

I will give Springsteen credit for one thing: You listen to a record (yes, I still call them that, have some respect, sonny, I helped win the Cold War) like "Brilliant Disguise" and it's so much more poignant and morally honest about the reason things were falling apart. The couple in that song are not only probably cheating on each other, there is no communication left, so nobody's going to take the first step and get it fixed. And he makes no excuses: It's a song about a husband's suspicion of his cheating wife, but he admits that his suspicion might be born of his own adultery. You won't hear that in "It Takes A Little Time" or any of the other music released by the "Pity me, I'm a Christian role-model/adulterer/divorcee" crowd, because it would sound like (and be) hypocrisy unless it followed a period of career hiatus and repentance. I'm not letting Gary Chapman totally off the hook, because I don't know or care to know the intimate details of why their marriage failed, but he must surely wonder where the girl who sang "If These Walls Could Speak" for him went off to.

People someimes fall out of love, to be sure. But the proper response for 2 Christians is to stick with it and persevere.

I heard it put this way, I believe by Tony Evans: "Do you still love her? If so, make it work. Is she your enemy? If so, you are called to love your enemy. Get in there and make it work." Sure, it sounds a little flip, but it's true: Two Christians should only be divorced if there is adultery or abuse and the cheating/abusing spouse will not stop their behavior.

8 posted on 09/23/2002 4:52:07 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
It was known from Brentwood to Nashville that Gary Chapman was a drug addict, lousy husband and an even worse father. Amy stuck with the marriage until there was nothing left.

And......it was their business.....

Since when do we have the right to fire our high powered gospel guns into a situation we have no knowledge of?

I admire Amy and Vince.

I admire the fact that they have not allowed the christian world to taint there love for each other. I admire the fact that they both share their faith openly.

What I am ashamed of is how once again.....people that call themselves believers can be so incredibly stupid. So quick to judge. So non-christlike.

9 posted on 09/23/2002 4:53:52 PM PDT by Fighting Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fighting Irish
Yet Mr. Irish - how quickly did you jump on President Clinton's case - how quickly did you rush to tell the world how inconsistent his behavior was with the high office he held (something you would have been entitled to do - because you would have been right)...
10 posted on 09/23/2002 4:57:38 PM PDT by KMC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fighting Irish
Christians in any high-profile position are going to be judged more stringently because they are in a place where they will have more effect on souls.

If you are shooting for a position of influence in ANY sphere...you need to have your act together more than the "little people".

11 posted on 09/23/2002 5:08:40 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KMC1
I'm not condoning any inappropriate behavior.

What I am trying to make you realize that entertainers, christian or not have their own lives.

I'll bet if Paul and Jan had first heard the news that King David had sex with another mans wife and then had that very same husband killed.......my god.........they would have had a holy orgy.

God however, will always continue to look at the heart. A very private affair......

12 posted on 09/23/2002 5:09:41 PM PDT by Fighting Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Fighting Irish
My wife used to be a big fan of Vince Gill. She has a similar problem with the hypocrisy of those who make careers in Christian faith or music and then do not walk the walk. Nobody expects Amy Grant or Vince Gill to be without sin. It is a disappointment to see adultery destroy two families.

People should be able to express disappointment in the adultery of two famous people with families torn by sin. Otherwise, it becomes tacit approval. We should be put off by a sin publicly committed. A complete tolerance of sin is a green light to evil. It is not how we are supposed to live our lives, whether or not we are Christian music stars.

I read the piece that he was big fan of Amy's but very hurt by her behavior.

13 posted on 09/23/2002 5:11:03 PM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: what's up
you need to have your act together more than the "little people".

Therein lies the problem. Christians never seem to agree on just what exactly defines "together".

14 posted on 09/23/2002 5:12:05 PM PDT by Fighting Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KMC1
This person should have made a decision whether he wanted to write about Amy, Ms. Toogood, or Miss America....

My head is spinning trying to find one thing that ties any of these subjects together.

15 posted on 09/23/2002 5:16:38 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up
judged more stringently because they are in a place

Who places them in that "Place"?

Humans want to worship something. The old gods of Baal are dust and we have erected new idols.....entertainers.

When we change our focus to where it belongs.....all this other tabloid junk holds no meaning any longer.

16 posted on 09/23/2002 5:16:45 PM PDT by Fighting Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Fighting Irish
Democrats seemed to think Clinton's affair was "private" also.

Everyone will have a different opinion on what constitutes good behavior in a position of authority and, yes, no one is perfect.

However, in our culture there are too few good examples of powerful people having good marriages.

I believe this is the issue at the moment in our time...we need more good marriages and holding people accountable is one way to achieve this.

17 posted on 09/23/2002 5:19:36 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Fighting Irish
True...worshipping christian rock stars or anyone else is wrong. I don't listen to any music much anymore...I'm long past my adolescent days of looking for some Christian "guru".

But society always has and always will look for examples to follow. People who achieve these "places" (as spoken of above) must be held accountable.

18 posted on 09/23/2002 5:22:18 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
What a very excellent and loving response you have given!
19 posted on 09/23/2002 5:23:53 PM PDT by Boxsford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Fighting Irish
I don't know how to respond to your remarks. The idea of holding up our Christian entertainers to a higher standard versus to be forgiving is, at first blush, the right thing to do. Then I think of James 3. While our entertainers are not quite "teachers" they are in a position to lead many to Christ. The dangers as James points out, are that as a leader you may lead them the wrong way and for that you are held to a greater level of responsibility. The question then is, are Christian entertainers in a position to lead others and if so, in which direction?
20 posted on 09/23/2002 5:28:56 PM PDT by elephantlips
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-192 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson