Ayman Gheith is the one with the beard
Posted on 09/13/2002 8:21:33 PM PDT by bootless
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:01:15 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
NAPLES, Florida (CNN) --The Georgia woman who prompted Friday's terror scare was "flat-out lying" when she told authorities she overheard three Muslim men at a restaurant laughing about September 11 and making suspicious comments, one of the men said late Friday.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Ayman Gheith is the one with the beard
I believe they're arrogant liars.
I agree.
If I turned in a bunch a potential terrorists to the police, I would probably not be all over the TV screen like a Chucky-Schumer clone.
it's perfectly ok to like to kaffhirs aka. infifels, this is what we are up against.
We don't know the facts yet.
I guess Mrs. Stone's son will be testifying about what he heard, too. It won't just be the word of one woman against three men. There are two witnesses to what the men were saying.
The men should have stuck with the "Just-joking" story, because now, when Eunice and her son testify about what they heard, the young men will have to think up yet another excuse.
They are going to run out of excuses eventually.
The plates were reported as not belonging to the car - making it a possiblity that the car was stolen.
They were traced back to someone in Chicago and it was verified later in the day that the plates were originally on another vehicle and there was a snafu in the plate transfer. The Police were NOT lying!!!
I just read that Barak article. It's not only permissible, it's their duty.
I guess her son could testify, too. Then it would be 3 against 2, rather than 3 against 1.
Heck, towns send bills for ambulance calls and false fire alarms.
What about the possibility that the cops had an outdated computer database?
OH,no, the cops had to leak a premature story to the media vultures.
Such a professional behavior by cops, convincting people on the media by innuendo and speculation.
Well let the Feds, or FL or GA, charge them with making terroristic threats and it can all come out in the trial.
Of course I take with a grain of salt their testimony on a Bible "to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth"
Try this theory. The police receive a tip that there could be three individuals with a bomb headed toward Miami to blow something big up. They pull the car over. They blow up the backpack. They tell the media that their dogs were alerted to explosives. They tell the media that the license plates are stolen. They shut down major raos arteries for 16-19 hours. They call in the FBI and who knows what else. Then they start to acquire facts whic don't help their theory. The license plates are valid. There are no explosives. Staring to look like "egg on the face" time. Thats when you back off and hope things go away as quickly and and quietly as possible.
I just read that Barak article. It's not only permissible, it's their duty.
Allah, the demon possed pedophile(TM) commands as much
Okay, let's, for the sake of arguement, say that there are three sides to the story : the men's, the woman's and THE TRUTH .
The men were uncooperative with the police, they blew through a token booth, there were traces of expolsives in one car, and they've now played the race card, claimed victimhood, and are calling Eunice a liar. What makes you think that the truth is on their side ?
The woman, heard something said by these three men. They must have been talking loudly enough, for her to have heard it. What they said made her uncomfortable enough to call the police and take down a lisence plate number. She has NOT been paid a dime. She has been on T.V., though. The Presidident asked EVERYONE to be on alert and turn in any suspicious people. We just had the 1 year anniversary of 9/11. A " sleeper cell " has been uncovered and men arrested. Muslim whack jobs, all over the world, are calling for our heads on a platter. Yeah, Eunice just hates Muslims, for no reason , and made a cramk call. NOT !
The truth is, you haven't enough sense to be even a little wary of a suspicious situation. I wouldn't want you anywhere near me, in the face of a posssible problem. You'd be too busy trying to explain it away. This isn't anything at all like the confetti incident. This government put Japanese people in camps, when we were fighting WW II. The people of this country, during WW I ( a war we fought on the wrong side of; but, that's another story ) refused to buy products, made in America, by Americans, that even had the name of a product, that was even remotely related to any of the nations we were not allies of. Ever hear of " Danish " pastry ? It isn't from Demark ! It's a Hungarian pastry, called delkeral. Changing the name, was the ONLY way, that bakeries could sell it, during and after WW I !
I am an RN in a northeast hospital in NJ and we just got out fresh batch of first year residents. Of 8 of them, 6 are of middle eastern dissent. The other 2 are Americans. This is quite sad, IMO. Where are all the future American docs?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.