Skip to comments.
Reaction to UN Speech by President Bush....
Media
| 12 September 2002
| jpj1
Posted on 09/12/2002 11:17:19 AM PDT by JPJ1
Please post your commnet or reactions from the media/congress on the speech today by President Bush. Has anyone heard any negative reactions?
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; iraq; jebbushsucks; speech; un; votemcbride
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
To: BOBTHENAILER
Dianne FineStain......... a Jew who hates Israel, and there's quite a few of her elk in the USA. Long live Israel!
To: Wright is right!
"By the time the Evening Newscasts roll around...Only on FOX will the critics' reactions be labeled "predictable." So, yer sayin' CBS, NBC, ABC, and CNN still telecast Evening News Shows?! I wouldn't know since my cable company finally started carrying FNC.
FReegards...MUD
To: desertcry
...a few of her elk in the USA.My grandfather used to hunt elk.
23
posted on
09/12/2002 12:26:21 PM PDT
by
ladtx
To: Tai_Chung
The United Nation cannot vote to declare that Security Countil resolutions should not be enforced. This is brilliant. President Bush is using the UN resolutions against the UN. Cool. So, any Democrats voting against an attack on Iraq are voting not to enforce U.N. resolutions and thereby immasculating the U.N. - not a bad thing in itself.
24
posted on
09/12/2002 12:27:00 PM PDT
by
Nephi
To: Argus
As always, President Bush was eloquent in his speech this am. He is powerful. We will win! I love my president!
25
posted on
09/12/2002 12:37:00 PM PDT
by
isasis
To: Wright is right!
By the time the Evening Newscasts roll around, the story will NOT be President Bush's speech to the UN, but DEMOCRATIC CRITICS' REACTION to the speech. Peter Jennings will make no mention of how stellar he'd earlier pronounced the speech, and the news editors will show Dubya in slow-mo in an attempt to make him look retarded. By the end of the broadcast, you will be made to believe that Tommy Daschle addressed the UN, not our President. Only on FOX will the critics' reactions be labeled "predictable."Couldn't have said it better myself. The RAT publicity machine on abc,cbs,nbc et al, will pull out all the stops to prevent a righteous war. In other words, a war to protect the American people, the Israelis and by extension the Europeans.
Of course we saw nothing but support from them when Clinton wanted to use the military for his little games.
To: ladtx
Yeah, and they are good eating too. Please excuse my bad
typing and poor proof reading. e=i. Thanks.
To: desertcry
a Jew who hates Israel, and there's quite a few of her elk in the USA. Long live Israel!Amen DC.
To: ladtx
Yeah, and they are good eating too. Please excuse my bad
typing and poor proof reading. e=i. Thanks.
To: chemainus
Looks like Wall Street didn't care for it much either.
To: JPJ1
To: JPJ1
It was a brilliant speech that made a compelling case for action against Iraz and left the UN little wiggle room.
To: chemainus
Is it legal to cut the balls off Kofi Annan for pretending to have any relationship at all to the brave and independent people who defeated NAZI ( socialist) Germany and Imperialist Japan in WW II . Someone please advise me on the legalities as the wish is already present. Thank you.After some effort, I believe I have located a legal precedent. Judge Roy Bean, Law West of the Pecos, once acquitted a man for killing a chinaman. After consulting what law books as were at his disposal, Judge Bean said he could find no law specifically against killing a chinaman in that teritory.
Similarly, I can find no prohibition against the castration of Kofi Annan. In fact, the procedure might actually calm him down, and he could stop humping the leg of every Neo-communist dictator who speaks ill of the USA. I would recommend, however, that he wear dresses, lipstick, and costume jewelry for a period of three months beforehand, so as to smooth the transition.
To: patrioticduty
So you don't have a clue?
To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
What balls?
35
posted on
09/12/2002 1:21:25 PM PDT
by
hunyb
To: chemainus
Kofi Annan would first have to have balls, in order for you to cut them off. Nice thought though.
36
posted on
09/12/2002 1:23:40 PM PDT
by
cmak9
To: BOBTHENAILER
"Of course we saw nothing but support from them when Clinton wanted to use the military for his little games."
ALL Presidents use the military for their little games.
The games (think of the board game Risk) are more sophisticated than most can comprehend is all.
You know it's true.
To: Mudboy Slim
I have a bet on October 16th.
To: patrioticduty
We can unjoin UNESCO at will. This was a meaningless offering to the UN nations.
To: Doctor Stochastic
They didn't care for the jobless claims number and Mr. Andrea Mitchell's speech.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson