Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What's going on that we don't know?
1 posted on 09/03/2002 8:24:01 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blam
I am getting tired of the New York Times and the Euroweenie papers creating all this hype and feeding it to Saddam for his reading pleasure.
2 posted on 09/03/2002 8:28:53 PM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
According to the date, this article was written five months ago.
4 posted on 09/03/2002 8:41:27 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
I have read that the E weapon is available that will send a gigantic electromagnetic pulse that cripples all communication and electrical services so if Sadaam retreats into Baghdad.The city will sit with no way for the troops to communicate with each other.Just wait them out like a seige.No need to go house to house.Let the Iraqi's either implode or go after their own leadership for getting them into this mess.
5 posted on 09/03/2002 8:42:53 PM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
And just think it all started with that Demorat LEAK that was planted by the DNC to try to label GWB as a WARMONGER. It has mushroomed to a point that even is deviding the GOP. That Clinton as DNC advisor really knows his onions huh?
11 posted on 09/03/2002 8:56:44 PM PDT by Uncle George
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
"Instead, Vice President Dick Cheney and Mr Rumsfeld have been left to make hawkish pronouncements, while Colin Powell, the secretary of state, has struck a much more conciliatory note."

While there are some that dislike Powell and say he is not hawkish enough or not a team player, in reality he doing EXACTLY what President Bush wants him to do. Powell is a loyal soldier and will do what his commander in chief wants. It is clear that there is a bit of good cop-bad cop going on. It's called strategery

12 posted on 09/03/2002 8:56:58 PM PDT by The Vast Right Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam; Miss Marple; ohioWfan
President Bush has summoned congressional leaders for top-level talks in the White House today ...

Unless I am badly mistaken, President Bush has a breakfast meeting with Congressional leaders every Wednesday morning ..... in which case this one might not be any more significant than any of the others.

13 posted on 09/03/2002 9:02:05 PM PDT by kayak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Donald Rumsfeld, the defence secretary, said yesterday that it was safe to assume the Iraqis had "not been playing tiddlywinks" since weapons inspectors left the country in 1998, but had instead been seeking to develop a nuclear capability.

He also hinted that in due course Mr Bush would provide "documentation" proving that Saddam has access to weapons of mass destruction.

I do believe that this administration does indeed know something that hasn't put out for mass consumption. Say what you will about this President, I don't believe he is of the character which allows him to embark on such a campaign for mere political reasons, as some of our other "leaders" have done.

When Mr Rumsfeld said in San Diego that "it is less important to have unanimity than it is to be making the right decision and doing the right thing, even though at the outset it may seem lonesome", he was telling America's allies that their views were largely irrelevant.

This is a wonderful thing; it demonstrates a willingness to put America first. Even if the fruits of such policies are not apparent initially.

The White House is determined to avoid a protracted debate on arms inspectors. Mr Cheney's contention that their readmission would "provide false confidence that Saddam was somehow back in his box" underlined this.

We've been having a protracted debate on this issue. He lost the Gulf War, and yet even to this day still refuses to comply. For a reason.

The reason is that he has been very busy developing weapons of mass destruction, and intends to use them someday, whether it be literally using them, or using them as a blackmail tool.

His plan is to buy more time to put into place what he wants. He is counting on the weak resolve of his opponents in this regard.

14 posted on 09/03/2002 9:04:45 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
I think we should go back to inspections, but do it by American rules. The rules are these: Inspectors show up unannounced. Inspectors go where they want to go, when they want to go, and see what they want to see. You don't say no to inspectors. At the first sign of resistance, the inspectors ask for clarification. If no means no, the inspectors leave the site, and move on to the next one. The moment the inspectors leave the site, the patrolling combat aircraft commence its destruction, which continues to our satisfaction.

I think it would take about three such inspections--particularly if well chosen--for Iraq to go into compliance mode. Alternatively, they could kick out the inspectors and face imminent invasion, but in that case more of our erstwhile allies might creep back on board. In this way we can neutralize Iraq while claiming to do everything "by the book", and at the same time move sufficient men and gear into the theater to take on Iran or Syria.

16 posted on 09/03/2002 9:12:03 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
What's going on that we don't know?

Probably a great deal. And it is especially important that we (in the large sense of that word) don't know. The fog of the many and apparently contradictory commentaries creating a great controversy, that had the press' attention over the past many weeks, could have pried that attention away from other preparations -- preparations that are much more important to the coming operations than the largely academic "debate".

I suspect that the Europeans, at least, are quite true to their appeasing positions, in which case they have been played as well.

It is important to remember that all this great controversy has been conducted in the absence of hard data. The hard data may have been the ace in the hole kept just to trump the "debate" once true preparations have been brought to near-completion. I suspect what is about to occur is the presentation of the hard data, information that has been in existence, but held in abeyance for just this moment.

17 posted on 09/03/2002 9:12:59 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
LET'S ROLL!
19 posted on 09/03/2002 9:40:53 PM PDT by PianoMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
9/11/1990 Bush announces war with Iraq.

9/11/2001 SH counter attacks.

9/11/2002 Bush announces we'll finish the war with Iraq.

9/12/2002 Bush announces new Lake Bagdad.
23 posted on 09/03/2002 11:07:58 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
What's going on that we don't know?


"The bridge controls started going crazy.
These engines are beginning to show signs of stress.
The emergency bypass control of the matter anti-matter integrator is fused.
If we keep this speed we'll blow up any minute now.
Captain whatta we do?!"

25 posted on 09/03/2002 11:30:11 PM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Many officials argue that it is only by telling allies an Iraqi invasion will happen anyway that they will be persuaded to come on board and reap the benefits in financial contracts and future influence.

One summer day the Little Red Hen found a grain of wheat.
"A grain of wheat!" said the Little Red Hen to herself. "I will plant it."
She asked the duck: "Will you help me plant this grain of wheat?"
"Not I," said the duck.
She asked the goose: "Will you help me plant this grain of wheat?"
"Not I," said the goose.
She asked the cat: "Will you help me plant this grain of wheat?"
"Not I," said the cat.
She asked the pig: "Will you help me plant this grain of wheat?"
"Not I," said the pig.
"Then I will plant it myself," said the Little Red Hen.
And she did.

Soon the wheat grew tall, and the Little Red Hen knew it was time to reap it.
"Who will help me reap the wheat?" she asked.
"Not I," said the duck.
"Not I," said the goose.
"Not I," said the cat.
"Not I," said the pig.
"Then I will reap it myself," said the Little Red Hen.
And she did.

So she reaped the wheat, and it was ready to take to the mill to be made into flour.
"Who will help me carry the wheat to the mill?" she asked.
"Not I," said the duck.
"Not I," said the goose.
"Not I," said the cat.
"Not I," said the pig.
"Then I will carry it myself," said the Little Red Hen.
And she did.

So she carried the wheat to the mill and the miller made it into flour, and she carried the flour home.
When she got there, she asked, "Who will help me make the flour into dough?"
"Not I," said the duck.
"Not I," said the goose.
"Not I," said the cat.
"Not I," said the pig.
"Then I will make the dough myself," said the Little Red Hen.
And she did.

So she put on a white apron, and mixed the dough. Soon the bread was ready to go into the oven.
"Who will help me bake the bread?" said the Little Red Hen.
"Not I," said the duck.
"Not I," said the goose.
"Not I," said the cat.
"Not I," said the pig.
"Then I will bake it myself," said the Little Red Hen.
And she did.

After the loaf had been taken from the oven it was set on the table to cool.
"And now," said the Little Red Hen, "who will help me to eat the bread?"
"I will!" said the duck.
"I will!" said the goose.
"I will!" said the cat.
"I will!" said the pig.
"No, I will eat it myself!" said the Little Red Hen.

And she did.

ALLIES? ALLIES? IT'S A JOKE, RIGHT?

31 posted on 09/04/2002 8:43:10 PM PDT by PhilDragoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson